Paper · 2014 · Agriculture (Pol nohospodárstvo)

Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) on antioxidant enzyme activities in salt-stressed bean (phaseolus vulgaris l.)

Omid Younesi; Ali Moradi

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium (PGPR) represents a wide variety of soil bacteria that, when grown in association with a host plant, result in stimulation of growth of their host. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of inoculation with a PGPR, Pseudomonas fluorescence, alone or in combination with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae (Nicol. & Gerd.), on antioxidant enzyme activities (catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POX)), phosphatase activity, solutes accumulation, growth and minerals nutrient uptake in shoots of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) affected by three levels of salt stress. Salinity decreased bean growth, regardless of the biological treatment and the salt stress level. The plants inoculated with P. fluorescence had significantly greater shoot biomass than the control plants at all salinity levels, whereas the mycorrhizal inoculation treatments were only effective in increasing shoot biomass at a low salinity level. The plants inoculated with P. fluorescence presented higher concentrations of shoots’ K + and lower concentrations of shoots’ Na + under high salt conditions. Salt stress increased shoots’ proline concentration, particularly in plants inoculated with the PGPR. Increasing salinity stress raised significantly the antioxidant enzyme activities, including those of total POX and CAT, of bean shoots compared with their corresponding nonstressed plants. The PGPR strain induced a higher increase in these antioxidant enzymes in response to severe salinity. Inoculation with selected PGPR could serve as a useful tool for alleviating salinity stress in salt-sensitive plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased bean growth across biological treatments.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
bean growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity decreased bean growth, regardless of the biological treatment and the salt stress level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescence inoculation increased shoot biomass at all salinity levels.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescencee0
Interactor
P. fluorescencee0symbiont
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
at all salinity levelse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“The plants inoculated with P. fluorescence had significantly greater shoot biomass than the control plants at all salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased shoot biomass only at low salinity.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculation treatmentse0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet1symbiont
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
at a low salinity levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mycorrhizal inoculation treatments were only effective in increasing shoot biomass at a low salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–150 · show in text ↑
t1

“Glomus mosseae (Nicol. & Gerd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescence inoculation raised shoot potassium under high salt.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescencee0
Interactor
P. fluorescencee0symbiont
Outcome
concentrations of shoots’ K +e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The plants inoculated with P. fluorescence presented higher concentrations of shoots’ K + and lower concentrations of shoots’ Na + under high salt conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescence inoculation lowered shoot sodium under high salt.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescencee0
Interactor
P. fluorescencee0symbiont
Outcome
concentrations of shoots’ Na +e0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The plants inoculated with P. fluorescence presented higher concentrations of shoots’ K + and lower concentrations of shoots’ Na + under high salt conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased shoot proline, especially with PGPR.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
shoots’ proline concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
particularly in plants inoculated with the PGPRe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress increased shoots’ proline concentration, particularly in plants inoculated with the PGPR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity raised shoot POX and CAT activities.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Increasing salinity stresse0
Gene
POX and CATe0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activities, including those of total POX and CATe0
Direction
raisede0
Comparator
corresponding nonstressed plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing salinity stress raised significantly the antioxidant enzyme activities, including those of total POX and CAT, of bean shoots compared with their corresponding nonstressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR induced a greater rise in antioxidant enzymes under severe salinity.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
PGPR straine0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
higher increasee0
Qualifier
severe salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The PGPR strain induced a higher increase in these antioxidant enzymes in response to severe salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–150 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selected PGPR inoculation could alleviate salinity stress in salt-sensitive plants.

Taxon
salt-sensitive plantse0
Treatment
Inoculation with selected PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
alleviating salinity stresse0

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with selected PGPR could serve as a useful tool for alleviating salinity stress in salt-sensitive plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1655 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

71 papers: 7 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

mycorrhiza · Funneliformis mosseae · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Funneliformis mosseae · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.