Paper · 1993 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Efficiency of P Fertilizers for Rice-Pulse Cropping System in the Laterite Soils of Coastal Karnataka

P K Sushama; L. Suseela Devi; R. Channabasave Gowda

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was taken up during wet season 1989 with different sources of phosphate. viz., superphosphate (SSP), Mussoorie rock phosphate (MRP). partially acidulated rock phosphate (ARP) and Mussoorie rock phosphate with fungi (MRPF). Grain yield of rice was highest with MRPF in conjunction with either green manure or farmyard manure. The fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) was highestfor the combination of MRPF plus green manure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of rice was highest with Mussoorie rock phosphate with fungi combined with green manure or farmyard manure.

Treatment
MRPFe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in conjunction with either green manure or farmyard manuree0
Setting
wet season 1989e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of P Fertilizers for Rice-Pulse Cropping System in the Laterite Soils of Coastal Karnataka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield of rice was highest with MRPF in conjunction with either green manure or farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–337 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field trial was taken up during wet season 1989 with different sources of phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer use efficiency was highest for MRPF plus green manure.

Treatment
MRPF plus green manuree1
Outcome
fertilizer use efficiency (FUE)e1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of P Fertilizers for Rice-Pulse Cropping System in the Laterite Soils of Coastal Karnataka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) was highestfor the combination of MRPF plus green manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–431 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

475 papers: 419 positive, 56 negative or no effect

418 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

471 papers more in this group

See all 475 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.