Paper · 2014 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Management of Meloidogyne incognita and Rhizoctonia solani Complex on Okra Through Integration of Trichoderma viride, Glomus fasciculatum and Mustard Cake

Dhrubajyoti Saikia; B. Bhagawati

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted under field conditions during kharif, 2012 in the ICR farm situated in Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India to manage the disease complex caused by M. incognita and R. solani on okra (Var. Parbhani Kranti) using Trichoderma viride, Glomus fasciculatum and Mustard cake. The experiment was conducted in Randomized Block Design with 3 replications. Each plot was inoculated with R. solani cultured in MSM @50g/m-2 and the initial nematode population was recorded to be 325 J2/200cc of soil. The efficacy of T. viride was tested as seed treatment and those of Glomus fasciculatum and Mustard cake as soil application, singly and in combination and compared with the control (i.e. M. incognita + R. solani). Both the bioagents and Mustard cake were found to be significantly effective in reducing the damage and increasing the growth parameters of okra as compared to the treatment with M. incognita and R. solani. However, the treatment with both bioagents and mustard cake showed better disease control, seedling stand and better reduction of galls, egg masses as also nematode population and increased growth parameters and yield in comparison to other treatments. This indicates the effectiveness of the bio agents and mustard cake on management of disease complex (M. incognita and R. solani) of okra.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioagents and mustard cake significantly reduced disease damage and increased okra growth versus pathogen control.

Treatment
bioagents and Mustard cakee0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
damage and increasing the growth parameters of okrae0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
treatment with M. incognita and R. solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Second interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the bioagents and Mustard cake were found to be significantly effective in reducing the damage and increasing the growth parameters of okra as compared to the treatment with M. incognita and R. solani.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bioagents and mustard cake gave better disease control and seedling stand than other treatments.

Treatment
treatment with both bioagents and mustard cakee0
Outcome
disease control, seedling stande0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with both bioagents and mustard cake showed better disease control, seedling stand and better reduction of galls, egg masses as also nematode population and increased growth parameters and yield in comparison to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced galls, egg masses and nematode population more than other treatments.

Treatment
treatment with both bioagents and mustard cakee0
Outcome
galls, egg masses as also nematode populatione0
Direction
better reductione0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with both bioagents and mustard cake showed better disease control, seedling stand and better reduction of galls, egg masses as also nematode population and increased growth parameters and yield in comparison to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased okra growth and yield relative to other treatments.

Treatment
treatment with both bioagents and mustard cakee0
Outcome
growth parameters and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with both bioagents and mustard cake showed better disease control, seedling stand and better reduction of galls, egg masses as also nematode population and increased growth parameters and yield in comparison to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biocontrol · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

biocontrol · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.