Paper · 2003 · Journal of research

Improving the Efficacy of Isoproturon by Tank Mixing with Other Herbicides

U. S. Walia; L. S. Brar

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the research farm of the Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana from 1995–96 to 1997–98 to assess the performance of tank mix application of isoproturon with pendimethalin or diclofop-methyl for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat. All tank mix applications provided improved control of P. minor as compared to their sole applications. Tank mix application of isoproturon with either pendimethalin or diclofop-methyl increased grain yield of wheat from 5–11 q/ha as compared to single application of isoproturon or pendimethalin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus pendimethalin improved Phalaris minor control over sole applications.

Treatment
isoproturon with pendimethaline1
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control of P. minore0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
their sole applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tank mix applications provided improved control of P. minor as compared to their sole applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“isoproturon with pendimethalin or diclofop-methyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–252 · show in text ↑
t0

“for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus diclofop-methyl improved Phalaris minor control over sole applications.

Treatment
diclofop-methyle1
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control of P. minore0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
their sole applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tank mix applications provided improved control of P. minor as compared to their sole applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“isoproturon with pendimethalin or diclofop-methyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–252 · show in text ↑
t0

“for the control of Phalaris minor in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus pendimethalin raised wheat grain yield by 5–11 q/ha over single herbicide application.

Treatment
isoproturon with either pendimethalin or diclofop-methyle0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5–11 q/hae0
Comparator
single application of isoproturon or pendimethaline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank mix application of isoproturon with either pendimethalin or diclofop-methyl increased grain yield of wheat from 5–11 q/ha as compared to single application of isoproturon or pendimethalin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–593 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

pendimethalin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

diclofop-methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

isoproturon · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

diclofop-methyl · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.