Abstract
Field experiments were conducted on a calcareous alluvial sandy loam soil (Calciorthent) to see the comparative effect of prilled urea (PR) and urea super granules (USG) on yield and quality of sugarcane. Use of USG up to 75 per cent of the recommended dose of N increased sugar and sugarcane yields significantly in comparison with PR. Cane juice quality was not affected significantly with these materials. USG was stimulating ammonification significantly in the soil than PR and reduced nitrification significantly.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Use of USG up to 75% of the recommended N dose increased sugar and sugarcane yields significantly compared with PR.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted on a calcareous alluvial sandy loam soil (Calciorthent) to see the comparative effect of prilled urea (PR) and urea super granules (USG) on yield and quality of sugarcane”
e1“Use of USG up to 75 per cent of the recommended dose of N increased sugar and sugarcane yields significantly in comparison with PR”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane juice quality was not affected significantly by USG compared with PR.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted on a calcareous alluvial sandy loam soil (Calciorthent) to see the comparative effect of prilled urea (PR) and urea super granules (USG) on yield and quality of sugarcane”
e2“Cane juice quality was not affected significantly with these materials”
Claim · model-written summary
USG stimulated soil ammonification significantly more than PR.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted on a calcareous alluvial sandy loam soil (Calciorthent) to see the comparative effect of prilled urea (PR) and urea super granules (USG) on yield and quality of sugarcane”
e3“USG was stimulating ammonification significantly in the soil than PR and reduced nitrification significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
USG reduced soil nitrification significantly.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted on a calcareous alluvial sandy loam soil (Calciorthent) to see the comparative effect of prilled urea (PR) and urea super granules (USG) on yield and quality of sugarcane”
e3“USG was stimulating ammonification significantly in the soil than PR and reduced nitrification significantly”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →nitrogen · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.