Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Direct and residual effect of nutrient management in maize (Zea mays) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system

ASHOK KUMAR

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at New Delhi to investigate the response of maize (Zea mays L.) - wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol.] cropping system to different nutrient-management practices during 2003-04 and 2004-05. The highest leaf-area index (LAI), yield attributes and yield of maize were recorded with the application of 120 kg N + 26.2 kg P + 41.5 kg Wha, closely followed by 120 kg N + 5 kg Zn + 10 t FYMIha. The LAI, yield attributes and yield of wheat were found maximum at the residual fertility of 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMlha. Wheat gave 22.7% more yield at residual fertility of 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIha. The data on maize-wheat system indicated that when 120 kg N + 5 kg Znlha was applied with 10 t FYMIha, production efficiency (46.0 kglha-day), total pro- ductivity (10.8 tlha), net returns (Rs 46,784lha) and benefit : cost ratio (2.17) were the maximum. The Zn uptake by maize and wheat was the highest at 120 kg N + 5 kg Zn + 10 t FYMIha and 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIha, respectively. Except available P at 60 kg N + 10 t FYMIha, 5 kg Zn + 10 t FYMIha and 5 kg Zn + 20 t of FYMIha, all the nutrients increased in the soil at different fertility levels. Higher residual organic C and available N, P, K and Zn in the soil were obtained with 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIha. It was concluded that combined application of 120 kg N + 5 kg Zn +I 0 t wheat cropping system. FYMIha was essential for higher productivity and profitability of maize -

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified nutrient application produced the highest maize LAI, yield attributes and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
120 kg N + 26.2 kg P + 41.5 kg Whae0
Outcome
leaf-area index (LAI), yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest leaf-area index (LAI), yield attributes and yield of maize were recorded with the application of 120 kg N + 26.2 kg P + 41.5 kg Wha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual fertility with zinc and FYM maximized wheat LAI, yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
residual fertility of 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMlhae0
Outcome
LAI, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LAI, yield attributes and yield of wheat were found maximum at the residual fertility of 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMlha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was 22.7% higher at the stated residual fertility.

Treatment
residual fertility of 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIhae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
22.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat gave 22.7% more yield at residual fertility of 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated nutrient treatment maximized system production efficiency at 46.0 kglha-day.

Treatment
120 kg N + 5 kg Znlha was applied with 10 t FYMIhae0
Outcome
production efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
46.0 kglha-daye0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when 120 kg N + 5 kg Znlha was applied with 10 t FYMIha, production efficiency (46.0 kglha-day), total pro- ductivity (10.8 tlha), net returns (Rs 46,784lha) and benefit : cost ratio (2.17) were the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment maximized total productivity at 10.8 tlha.

Treatment
120 kg N + 5 kg Znlha was applied with 10 t FYMIhae0
Outcome
total pro- ductivitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
10.8 tlhae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when 120 kg N + 5 kg Znlha was applied with 10 t FYMIha, production efficiency (46.0 kglha-day), total pro- ductivity (10.8 tlha), net returns (Rs 46,784lha) and benefit : cost ratio (2.17) were the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment maximized net returns at Rs 46,784lha.

Treatment
120 kg N + 5 kg Znlha was applied with 10 t FYMIhae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 46,784lhae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when 120 kg N + 5 kg Znlha was applied with 10 t FYMIha, production efficiency (46.0 kglha-day), total pro- ductivity (10.8 tlha), net returns (Rs 46,784lha) and benefit : cost ratio (2.17) were the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment maximized benefit to cost ratio at 2.17.

Treatment
120 kg N + 5 kg Znlha was applied with 10 t FYMIhae0
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.17e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when 120 kg N + 5 kg Znlha was applied with 10 t FYMIha, production efficiency (46.0 kglha-day), total pro- ductivity (10.8 tlha), net returns (Rs 46,784lha) and benefit : cost ratio (2.17) were the maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize zinc uptake was highest under the stated application.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
120 kg N + 5 kg Zn + 10 t FYMIhae0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn uptake by maize and wheat was the highest at 120 kg N + 5 kg Zn + 10 t FYMIha and 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat zinc uptake was highest under the stated residual treatment.

Treatment
5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIhae0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn uptake by maize and wheat was the highest at 120 kg N + 5 kg Zn + 10 t FYMIha and 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1008 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nutrients increased at different fertility levels except available P under specified treatments.

Outcome
nutrients increased in the soile0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Except available P at 60 kg N + 10 t FYMIha, 5 kg Zn + 10 t FYMIha and 5 kg Zn + 20 t of FYMIhae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Except available P at 60 kg N + 10 t FYMIha, 5 kg Zn + 10 t FYMIha and 5 kg Zn + 20 t of FYMIha, all the nutrients increased in the soil at different fertility levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated fertility yielded higher residual soil organic C and available N, P, K and Zn.

Treatment
5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIhae0
Outcome
residual organic C and available N, P, K and Zn in the soile0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Higher residual organic C and available N, P, K and Zn in the soil were obtained with 5 kg Zn + 20 t FYMIha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1285 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.