Paper · 1992 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Mineral Concentration of Yellow Squash Responds to Irrigation Method and Fertilization Management

G.H. Clough; S.J. Locascio; S.M. Olson

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Squash (Cucurbita pepo L. var. melopepo) was grown at two locations with different soil types as a second crop in a succession cropping study that used previously cropped polyethylene-mulched beds. Squash was produced with drip or overhead irrigation and with concurrent N-K fertilization or residual fertilizer from the previous crop. Tissue mineral concentration responses to irrigation method were variable; in early fruit, N and K concentrations were higher with overhead than for drip, but leaf Ca and Mg concentrations were higher with drip than with overhead irrigation. Concentrations of N and K were higher with concurrent than with residual fertilization and increased with an increase in application rate. In contrast, concentrations of P, Ca, and Mg decreased with concurrent fertilization and an increase in application rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overhead irrigation increased early-fruit nitrogen and potassium relative to drip irrigation.

Taxon
Squashe1
Organ / stage
early fruite0
Treatment
overheade0
Outcome
N and K concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dripe0

Verbatim

e0

“in early fruit, N and K concentrations were higher with overhead than for drip”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“Squash (Cucurbita pepo L. var. melopepo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation increased leaf calcium and magnesium relative to overhead irrigation.

Taxon
Squashe1
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
dripe0
Outcome
leaf Ca and Mg concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
overhead irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“leaf Ca and Mg concentrations were higher with drip than with overhead irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–576 · show in text ↑
e1

“Squash (Cucurbita pepo L. var. melopepo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concurrent fertilization increased nitrogen and potassium concentrations relative to residual fertilizer and with higher application rates.

Taxon
Squashe1
Treatment
concurrente0
Outcome
Concentrations of N and Ke0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
residual fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of N and K were higher with concurrent than with residual fertilization and increased with an increase in application rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–716 · show in text ↑
e1

“Squash (Cucurbita pepo L. var. melopepo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concurrent fertilization and increased rate decreased phosphorus, calcium and magnesium concentrations.

Taxon
Squashe1
Treatment
concurrent fertilization and an increase in application ratee0
Outcome
concentrations of P, Ca, and Mge0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of P, Ca, and Mg decreased with concurrent fertilization and an increase in application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–837 · show in text ↑
e1

“Squash (Cucurbita pepo L. var. melopepo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.