Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF IRRIGAION INTERVALS AND NITROGEN FERTILIZER RATES ON SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.) GROWTH, YIELD, NUTRITIONAL STATUS AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY.

E. Ibrahim,; E. Selim

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Optimal irrigation and nitrogen management remains a major challenge for improving water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency, and vegetables yield in Egypt. The effect of three irrigation intervals (8, 12 and 16 days, starting after first irrigation), three nitrogen fertilizer rates (60, 75 (control) and 90 kg/fed.) and their interaction on growth, fruit yield, nutritional status, water use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency of summer squash cv. Eskandrani were studied in two experiments conducted in a clay loam soil at a private farm, Mansoura district, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt, during the two summer seasons of 2006 and 2007. Results indicated that irrigation every 8 days throughout growing season resulted in higher foliage weight, number of leaves and leaves weight per plant, total fruit yield/fed., marketable yield/fed., mean fruit weight, seasonal applied water and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AEN) in both summer seasons. Early fruit yield/fed. and K concentration in leaves were highest with the intermediate interval (12 days) in both summer seasons. On the other hand, there were insignificant differences between irrigation every 8 or 12 days intervals in N, P, and K uptake by plant in both seasons. Water use efficiency (WUE) and N and P concentration in leaves were highest with irrigation interval at 16 days in both seasons. All studied characters except AEN were significantly increased with increasing “N” rates, whereas there were insignificant differences between 75 and 90 kg N/fed. in either P concentration in leaves or WUE in both seasons. AEN was significantly decreased with raising N rates in both seasons. The interaction effect between irrigation rates and “N” levels was significant for all the studied parameters in both seasons. Generally, it could be concluded that irrigation every 12 days intervals combined with application of 75 kg N/fed. to summer squash cv. Eskandrani fields might gave the chance for increasing water and nitrogen use efficiency and produce satisfactory and good marketable fruit yield with minimizing environmental impact of over-fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 8 days increased foliage weight, number of leaves and leaves weight per plant in both seasons.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
irrigation every 8 dayse0
Outcome
foliage weight, number of leaves and leaves weight per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation every 8 days throughout growing season resulted in higher foliage weight, number of leaves and leaves weight per plant, total fruit yield/fed., marketable yield/fed., mean fruit weight, seasonal applied water and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AEN) in both summer seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 8 days increased total fruit yield/fed., marketable yield/fed., mean fruit weight in both seasons.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
irrigation every 8 dayse0
Outcome
total fruit yield/fed., marketable yield/fed., mean fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation every 8 days throughout growing season resulted in higher foliage weight, number of leaves and leaves weight per plant, total fruit yield/fed., marketable yield/fed., mean fruit weight, seasonal applied water and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AEN) in both summer seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 8 days increased seasonal applied water and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AEN) in both seasons.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
irrigation every 8 dayse0
Outcome
seasonal applied water and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AEN)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation every 8 days throughout growing season resulted in higher foliage weight, number of leaves and leaves weight per plant, total fruit yield/fed., marketable yield/fed., mean fruit weight, seasonal applied water and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AEN) in both summer seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 12-day irrigation interval gave the highest early fruit yield.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
intermediate interval (12 days)e0
Outcome
Early fruit yield/fed.e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Early fruit yield/fed. and K concentration in leaves were highest with the intermediate interval (12 days) in both summer seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 12-day irrigation interval gave the highest leaf K concentration.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
intermediate interval (12 days)e0
Outcome
K concentration in leavese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Early fruit yield/fed. and K concentration in leaves were highest with the intermediate interval (12 days) in both summer seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and K uptake did not differ significantly between 8- and 12-day irrigation.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
irrigation every 8e0
Outcome
N, P, and K uptake by plante0
Direction
insignificant differencese0
Comparator
12 days intervalse0

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“there were insignificant differences between irrigation every 8 or 12 days intervals in N, P, and K uptake by plant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 16-day irrigation interval gave the highest water use efficiency.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
irrigation interval at 16 dayse0
Outcome
Water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water use efficiency (WUE) and N and P concentration in leaves were highest with irrigation interval at 16 days in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 16-day interval gave the highest leaf N and P concentration.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
irrigation interval at 16 dayse0
Outcome
N and P concentration in leavese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water use efficiency (WUE) and N and P concentration in leaves were highest with irrigation interval at 16 days in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rates significantly increased all studied characters except AEN.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
increasing “N” ratese0
Outcome
All studied characters except AENe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“All studied characters except AEN were significantly increased with increasing “N” rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf P concentration did not significantly differ between 75 and 90 kg N/fed.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
90 kg N/fed.e0
Outcome
P concentration in leavese0
Direction
insignificant differencese0
Comparator
75e0

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“there were insignificant differences between 75 and 90 kg N/fed. in either P concentration in leaves or WUE in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE did not significantly differ between 75 and 90 kg N/fed.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
90 kg N/fed.e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
insignificant differencese0
Comparator
75e0

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“there were insignificant differences between 75 and 90 kg N/fed. in either P concentration in leaves or WUE in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic nitrogen efficiency significantly decreased as nitrogen rate rose.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
raising N ratese0
Outcome
AENe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“AEN was significantly decreased with raising N rates in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1659 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation interval and nitrogen rate interacted significantly for all studied parameters.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
irrigation rates and “N” levelse0
Outcome
all the studied parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction effect between irrigation rates and “N” levels was significant for all the studied parameters in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1786 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested 12-day irrigation and 75 kg N/fed. for efficiency and satisfactory yield.

Taxon
SUMMER SQUASHt0
Treatment
irrigation every 12 days intervals combined with application of 75 kg N/fed.e0
Outcome
increasing water and nitrogen use efficiency and produce satisfactory and good marketable fruit yielde0

Verbatim

t0

“SUMMER SQUASH (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation every 12 days intervals combined with application of 75 kg N/fed. to summer squash cv. Eskandrani fields might gave the chance for increasing water and nitrogen use efficiency and produce satisfactory and good marketable fruit yield with minimizing environmental impact of over-fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–2128 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.