Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Productivity, profitability and stability of rice (Oryza sativa) based cropping systems in eastern Uttar Pradesh

ALOK KUMAR; D.S. YADAV; R.M. SlNGH; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems were tested from 1995 96 to 1999 2000 at Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh. Highly intensive crop sequences, viz. rice potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. Cossonl blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.), rice potato wheat (Triticum aestivum 1. emend. Fiori Pao1.) sesbania (Sesbania aculeata Pers.) green manure and rice potato garlic (Allium sativum L.) cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] green fodder maize (Zea mays L.), were found to be Y distinctly better in terms of rice grain equivalent (15,336 to 17,782 kglha) and productivity (51.6 to 53.1 kg grainldaylha) compared to rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequence which yielded rice grain equivalent of 11,450 kg/ ha and productivity of 44 kg grainldaylha. However, in terms of stability, the rice wheat green manure sequence was more stable, with a stability index 0.95 and profitable (benefit : cost ratio 1.68) than these intensive cropping systems. The benefit : cost ratio of the systems, which had potato as a component crop, became low because of higher cost of cultivation due to more labour (man days) requirement. Rice potato garlic green fodder was more nutrients exhaustive sequence which decreased organic carbon status and nutrient availability of soil. However, in situ green manuring of Sesbania aculeata during summer (raid) enhanced soil fertility and improved organic matter and nutrient availability. Rice wheat sequence with sesbania green manuring was more suitable for better net returns and stable procjuction with minimum labour (man days) requirement under irrigated conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highly intensive rice-based crop sequences were distinctly better in rice grain equivalent (15,336 to 17,782 kg/ha) than the rice-wheat-sesbania green manure sequence (11,450 kg/ha).

Treatment
Highly intensive crop sequencese1
Outcome
rice grain equivalente2
Direction
bettere2
Value
15,336 to 17,782 kglhae2
Qualifier
11,450 kg/ hae3
Comparator
rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequencee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highly intensive crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“distinctly better in terms of rice grain equivalent (15,336 to 17,782 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–592 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequence which yielded rice grain equivalent of 11,450 kg/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highly intensive rice-based crop sequences had higher productivity (51.6 to 53.1 kg grain/day/ha) than the rice-wheat-sesbania green manure sequence (44 kg grain/day/ha).

Treatment
Highly intensive crop sequencese1
Outcome
productivitye2
Direction
bettere2
Value
51.6 to 53.1 kg grainldaylhae2
Qualifier
44 kg grainldaylhae3
Comparator
rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequencee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highly intensive crop sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“distinctly better in terms of rice grain equivalent (15,336 to 17,782 kglha) and productivity (51.6 to 53.1 kg grainldaylha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–640 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequence which yielded rice grain equivalent of 11,450 kg/ ha and productivity of 44 kg grainldaylha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice-wheat-green manure sequence was more stable (stability index 0.95) than the intensive cropping systems.

Treatment
rice wheat green manure sequencee2
Outcome
stabilitye2
Direction
more stablee2
Value
0.95e2
Comparator
these intensive cropping systemse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“the rice wheat green manure sequence was more stable, with a stability index 0.95 and profitable (benefit : cost ratio 1.68) than these intensive cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice-wheat-green manure sequence was more profitable (benefit:cost ratio 1.68) than the intensive cropping systems.

Treatment
rice wheat green manure sequencee2
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe2
Direction
profitablee2
Value
1.68e2
Comparator
these intensive cropping systemse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“the rice wheat green manure sequence was more stable, with a stability index 0.95 and profitable (benefit : cost ratio 1.68) than these intensive cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit:cost ratio of the systems with potato as a component crop became low, because of higher cultivation cost from more labour requirement.

Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe2
Direction
lowe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The benefit : cost ratio of the systems, which had potato as a component crop, became low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1078 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice-potato-garlic-green fodder sequence was more nutrient exhaustive and decreased soil organic carbon status and nutrient availability.

Taxon
Rice potato garlic green foddere2
Outcome
organic carbon status and nutrient availability of soile2
Direction
decreasede2

Verbatim

e2

“Rice potato garlic green fodder was more nutrients exhaustive sequence which decreased organic carbon status and nutrient availability of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In situ green manuring of Sesbania aculeata during summer enhanced soil fertility and improved organic matter and nutrient availability.

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosae2
Treatment
in situ green manuringe2
Outcome
soil fertility and improved organic matter and nutrient availabilitye2
Direction
enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in situ green manuring of Sesbania aculeata during summer (raid) enhanced soil fertility and improved organic matter and nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1455 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The rice-wheat sequence with sesbania green manuring is recommended as more suitable for better net returns and stable production with minimum labour under irrigated conditions.

Taxon
Rice wheat sequence with sesbania green manuringe2
Outcome
better net returns and stable procjuctione2
Setting
irrigated conditionse2

Verbatim

e2

“Rice wheat sequence with sesbania green manuring was more suitable for better net returns and stable procjuction with minimum labour (man days) requirement under irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1639 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 110 positive, 14 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

rotation · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

rotation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 72 positive, 14 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.