Abstract
Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems were tested from 1995 96 to 1999 2000 at Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh. Highly intensive crop sequences, viz. rice potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. Cossonl blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.), rice potato wheat (Triticum aestivum 1. emend. Fiori Pao1.) sesbania (Sesbania aculeata Pers.) green manure and rice potato garlic (Allium sativum L.) cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] green fodder maize (Zea mays L.), were found to be Y distinctly better in terms of rice grain equivalent (15,336 to 17,782 kglha) and productivity (51.6 to 53.1 kg grainldaylha) compared to rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequence which yielded rice grain equivalent of 11,450 kg/ ha and productivity of 44 kg grainldaylha. However, in terms of stability, the rice wheat green manure sequence was more stable, with a stability index 0.95 and profitable (benefit : cost ratio 1.68) than these intensive cropping systems. The benefit : cost ratio of the systems, which had potato as a component crop, became low because of higher cost of cultivation due to more labour (man days) requirement. Rice potato garlic green fodder was more nutrients exhaustive sequence which decreased organic carbon status and nutrient availability of soil. However, in situ green manuring of Sesbania aculeata during summer (raid) enhanced soil fertility and improved organic matter and nutrient availability. Rice wheat sequence with sesbania green manuring was more suitable for better net returns and stable procjuction with minimum labour (man days) requirement under irrigated conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Highly intensive rice-based crop sequences were distinctly better in rice grain equivalent (15,336 to 17,782 kg/ha) than the rice-wheat-sesbania green manure sequence (11,450 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Highly intensive crop sequencese1
- Outcome
- rice grain equivalente2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Value
- 15,336 to 17,782 kglhae2
- Qualifier
- 11,450 kg/ hae3
- Comparator
- rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequencee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems”
e1“Highly intensive crop sequences”
e2“distinctly better in terms of rice grain equivalent (15,336 to 17,782 kglha)”
e3“compared to rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequence which yielded rice grain equivalent of 11,450 kg/ ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Highly intensive rice-based crop sequences had higher productivity (51.6 to 53.1 kg grain/day/ha) than the rice-wheat-sesbania green manure sequence (44 kg grain/day/ha).
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Highly intensive crop sequencese1
- Outcome
- productivitye2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Value
- 51.6 to 53.1 kg grainldaylhae2
- Qualifier
- 44 kg grainldaylhae3
- Comparator
- rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequencee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems”
e1“Highly intensive crop sequences”
e2“distinctly better in terms of rice grain equivalent (15,336 to 17,782 kglha) and productivity (51.6 to 53.1 kg grainldaylha)”
e3“compared to rice wheat sesbania green manure (GM) sequence which yielded rice grain equivalent of 11,450 kg/ ha and productivity of 44 kg grainldaylha”
Claim · model-written summary
The rice-wheat-green manure sequence was more stable (stability index 0.95) than the intensive cropping systems.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- rice wheat green manure sequencee2
- Outcome
- stabilitye2
- Direction
- more stablee2
- Value
- 0.95e2
- Comparator
- these intensive cropping systemse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems”
e2“the rice wheat green manure sequence was more stable, with a stability index 0.95 and profitable (benefit : cost ratio 1.68) than these intensive cropping systems”
Claim · model-written summary
The rice-wheat-green manure sequence was more profitable (benefit:cost ratio 1.68) than the intensive cropping systems.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- rice wheat green manure sequencee2
- Outcome
- benefit : cost ratioe2
- Direction
- profitablee2
- Value
- 1.68e2
- Comparator
- these intensive cropping systemse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Six rice (Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems”
e2“the rice wheat green manure sequence was more stable, with a stability index 0.95 and profitable (benefit : cost ratio 1.68) than these intensive cropping systems”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit:cost ratio of the systems with potato as a component crop became low, because of higher cultivation cost from more labour requirement.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume2 - Outcome
- benefit : cost ratioe2
- Direction
- lowe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“The benefit : cost ratio of the systems, which had potato as a component crop, became low”
Claim · model-written summary
The rice-potato-garlic-green fodder sequence was more nutrient exhaustive and decreased soil organic carbon status and nutrient availability.
Verbatim
e2“Rice potato garlic green fodder was more nutrients exhaustive sequence which decreased organic carbon status and nutrient availability of soil”
Claim · model-written summary
In situ green manuring of Sesbania aculeata during summer enhanced soil fertility and improved organic matter and nutrient availability.
- Taxon
- Sesbania aculeata
Sesbania bispinosae2
- Treatment
- in situ green manuringe2
- Outcome
- soil fertility and improved organic matter and nutrient availabilitye2
- Direction
- enhancede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“in situ green manuring of Sesbania aculeata during summer (raid) enhanced soil fertility and improved organic matter and nutrient availability”
Claim · model-written summary
The rice-wheat sequence with sesbania green manuring is recommended as more suitable for better net returns and stable production with minimum labour under irrigated conditions.
Verbatim
e2“Rice wheat sequence with sesbania green manuring was more suitable for better net returns and stable procjuction with minimum labour (man days) requirement under irrigated conditions”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →rotation · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →rotation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
82 papers more in this group
See all 86 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.