Paper · 2015

Evaluation of salt tolerance in wheat genotypes using growth and carbon isotopes discrimination technique

Muhammad Ubaidullah Shirazi; Khan; S. M. Mujtaba; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted in green house to select suitable salt tolerant wheat genotypes on the basis of growth performance and carbon isotopes discrimination (CID) technique. Nine newly developed double haploids (DH) wheat genotypes were tested under gravel culture, along with salt tolerant (LU-26s) and high yielding (Sarsabz) checks. The crop was irrigated by non-saline (control) and saline (12dS/m) water and raised up to maturity, growth parameters (i.e. plant height, plant biomass, productive tillers, spike length, number of spiklets/spike, number of grains / spike, grain weight/ spike and grain yield/ 15 plants) were recorded after harvesting. Plant samples (straw) were collected and were analyzed for carbon isotopic ratio (C/ C) from IAEA laboratories Vienna Austria. The data showed that there was significant decrease in all the growth parameters due to salinity. On the basis of performance in different growth parameters it was found that wheat genotypes V3-DH, V9-DH, V10-DH, V13-DH, and LU-26s had good response at 12dSm, thus can be categorized as better performing genotypes. Studies on carbon isotopes discrimination (CID) showed a decreasing trend under salinity. Mean CID values were 20.86 and 17.49‰ under two environments (non saline and saline, respectively), showing an overall 19% decrease under salinity. Generally the wheat genotypes having higher grain yield also had high carbon isotopes discrimination (CID). The relationship between grain yield and CID (∆) was positive (R = 0.695). The genotypes V10-DH, V13-DH with lower decrease in CID (i.e. 1.2 & 11.0%, respectively), also had high grain yield under salinity. Therefore the studies suggest that we can include CID technique as one of the selection criteria for salt tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased all measured growth parameters of the wheat genotypes.

Treatment
saline (12dS/m) watere1
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
non-saline (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was significant decrease in all the growth parameters due to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–878 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigated by non-saline (control) and saline (12dS/m) water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon isotope discrimination in wheat decreased under salinity, from 20.86 to 17.49‰, an overall 19% decrease.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
CIDe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
19%e0
Qualifier
20.86 and 17.49‰e0
Comparator
non salinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mean CID values were 20.86 and 17.49‰ under two environments (non saline and saline, respectively), showing an overall 19% decrease under salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1334 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat genotypes V3-DH, V9-DH, V10-DH, V13-DH and LU-26s responded well in growth parameters at 12 dS/m salinity and were categorised as better performing.

Material
V3-DH, V9-DH, V10-DH, V13-DH, and LU-26se0
Treatment
12dSme0
Outcome
good responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat genotypes V3-DH, V9-DH, V10-DH, V13-DH, and LU-26s had good response at 12dSm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1040 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat genotypes with higher grain yield generally also had high carbon isotope discrimination.

Material
wheat genotypes having higher grain yielde0
Outcome
carbon isotopes discrimination (CID)e0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Generally the wheat genotypes having higher grain yield also had high carbon isotopes discrimination (CID)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1442 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and CID were positively related in wheat (R = 0.695).

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
R = 0.695e0
Comparator
CID (∆)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The relationship between grain yield and CID (∆) was positive (R = 0.695)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1517 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype V10-DH had a lower decrease in CID (1.2%) and also high grain yield under salinity.

Material
V10-DHe0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
decrease in CIDe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.2e0
Qualifier
also had high grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The genotypes V10-DH, V13-DH with lower decrease in CID (i.e. 1.2 & 11.0%, respectively), also had high grain yield under salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1649 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype V13-DH had a lower decrease in CID (11.0%) and also high grain yield under salinity.

Material
V13-DHe0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
decrease in CIDe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
11.0%e0
Qualifier
also had high grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The genotypes V10-DH, V13-DH with lower decrease in CID (i.e. 1.2 & 11.0%, respectively), also had high grain yield under salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1649 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest including the CID technique as one selection criterion for salt tolerance in wheat.

Outcome
selection criteria for salt tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“we can include CID technique as one of the selection criteria for salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1766 · show in text ↑

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 19 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.