Paper · 1980 · Weed Science

The Basis of the Antagonistic Effect of 2,4-D on Diclofop-Methyl Toxicity to Wild Oat (Avena fatua)

B. G. Todd; E. H. Stobbe

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
60
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The interaction between diclofop-methyl {2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] methyl propanoate} and 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] was evaluated. Foliar applications of the two herbicides in a tank mixture were antagonistic with respect to wild oat ( Avena fatua L.) control. Application of mixtures of the two herbicides to wild oat roots resulted in an additive herbicidal effect. The acid form of 2,4-D was determined to be the component of the 2,4-D formulation that reduced the toxicity of foliar-applied diclofop-methyl to wild oat. Analysis of diclofop-methyl solutions with and without added 2,4-D revealed no degradation products of dichlofop-methyl, nor any evidence of complexing between diclofop-methyl and 2,4-D. Addition of 2,4-D to the diclofop-methyl spray solution did not affect diclofop-methyl spray retention by, or penetration into, wild oat leaves. Movement of radioactivity to roots and to shoot apices following application of 14 C-diclofop-methyl to wild oat leaves was reduced by addition of 2,4-D to the treatment solution. Deesterification of diclofop-methyl was inhibited by 2,4-D. The accumulation of diclofop-methyl in these wild oat leaves resulted in membrane damage and leaf necrosis. Symplastic movement of the des-methyl acid, diclofop, to sensitive meristematic areas was reduced. As insufficient toxicant reached meristematic areas to permanently interrupt meristematic activity, the wild oat plants were able to outgrow the contact damage to their leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar tank mixtures of the herbicides antagonized wild oat control.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
the two herbicides in a tank mixturee0
Outcome
wild oat ( Avena fatua L.) controle0
Direction
antagonistice0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of the two herbicides in a tank mixture were antagonistic with respect to wild oat ( Avena fatua L.) control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root application of the herbicide mixture produced an additive herbicidal effect.

Taxon
wild oate0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
mixtures of the two herbicidese0
Outcome
herbicidal effecte0
Direction
additivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of mixtures of the two herbicides to wild oat roots resulted in an additive herbicidal effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The acid form of 2,4-D reduced foliar diclofop-methyl toxicity to wild oat.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
The acid form of 2,4-De0
Outcome
toxicity of foliar-applied diclofop-methyle0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The acid form of 2,4-D was determined to be the component of the 2,4-D formulation that reduced the toxicity of foliar-applied diclofop-methyl to wild oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 2,4-D did not alter diclofop-methyl spray retention or penetration in wild oat leaves.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
Addition of 2,4-De0
Outcome
diclofop-methyl spray retention by, or penetration into, wild oat leavese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of 2,4-D to the diclofop-methyl spray solution did not affect diclofop-methyl spray retention by, or penetration into, wild oat leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 2,4-D reduced movement of diclofop-methyl radioactivity to roots and shoot apices.

Taxon
wild oate0
Organ / stage
roots and to shoot apicese0
Treatment
addition of 2,4-De0
Outcome
Movement of radioactivity to roots and to shoot apicese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Movement of radioactivity to roots and to shoot apices following application of 14 C-diclofop-methyl to wild oat leaves was reduced by addition of 2,4-D to the treatment solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D inhibited diclofop-methyl deesterification.

Taxon
wild oatt0
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
Deesterification of diclofop-methyle0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Deesterification of diclofop-methyl was inhibited by 2,4-D.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Oat (Avena fatua)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–99 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop-methyl accumulated in wild oat leaves and caused membrane damage and necrosis.

Taxon
wild oate0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
membrane damage and leaf necrosise0
Qualifier
accumulation of diclofop-methyle0

Verbatim

e0

“The accumulation of diclofop-methyl in these wild oat leaves resulted in membrane damage and leaf necrosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symplastic movement of diclofop to sensitive meristems was reduced.

Taxon
wild oatt0
Outcome
Symplastic movement of the des-methyl acid, diclofop, to sensitive meristematic arease0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“Symplastic movement of the des-methyl acid, diclofop, to sensitive meristematic areas was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Oat (Avena fatua)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–99 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild oat plants outgrew leaf contact damage because too little toxicant reached meristems to stop activity permanently.

Taxon
wild oate0
Outcome
outgrow the contact damage to their leavese0
Qualifier
insufficient toxicant reached meristematic arease0

Verbatim

e0

“As insufficient toxicant reached meristematic areas to permanently interrupt meristematic activity, the wild oat plants were able to outgrow the contact damage to their leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1503 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

2,4-D · pest · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · control · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.