Paper · 1977 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Iron Chlorosis in Peach Plants, Changes in Chlorophyl and Growth Pattern

A. S. Bindra

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Changes in growth pattern of G. F. 305 peach plants as affected by iron deficiency was worked out in sand and water culture experiments. Iron deficiency in peach plants was characterised by interveinal chlorosis of leaves, the mid-rib being comparatively more green than secondary veins. When iron deficient plants were fed with nutrient solution containing labelled iron the distribution of iron tended to follow the pattern of chlorophyl distribution in such leaves. As the chlorosis advanced chlorophyl B decrease more than chlorophyl A. Root growth was less affected than stem and leaves. Iron deficiency lead to cessation of growth of the apical meristem and disturbance in the mechanism of cerelative inhibition. Different branches of a plant showed highly inequal intensities of chlorosis. The most severely affected shoot was generally the central one.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deficiency in peach plants caused interveinal chlorosis of leaves, with the mid-rib remaining greener than the secondary veins.

Taxon
peach plantsPrunus persicae0
Treatment
Iron deficiencye0
Outcome
interveinal chlorosis of leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron deficiency in peach plants was characterised by interveinal chlorosis of leaves, the mid-rib being comparatively more green than secondary veins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In iron-deficient peach plants fed labelled iron, the distribution of iron tended to follow the pattern of chlorophyll distribution in the chlorotic leaves.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Outcome
distribution of irone0
Qualifier
tended to follow the pattern of chlorophyl distributione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“the distribution of iron tended to follow the pattern of chlorophyl distribution in such leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–467 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As chlorosis advanced in peach plants, chlorophyll B decreased more than chlorophyll A.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Outcome
chlorophyl Be0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
more than chlorophyl Ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“As the chlorosis advanced chlorophyl B decrease more than chlorophyl A”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under iron deficiency, root growth of peach plants was less affected than growth of stem and leaves.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Outcome
Root growthe0
Direction
less affectede0
Qualifier
than stem and leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root growth was less affected than stem and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deficiency led to cessation of growth of the apical meristem in peach plants.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Iron deficiencye0
Outcome
growth of the apical meristeme0
Direction
cessatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Iron deficiency lead to cessation of growth of the apical meristem and disturbance in the mechanism of cerelative inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deficiency led to disturbance of the mechanism of correlative inhibition in peach plants.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Iron deficiencye0
Outcome
mechanism of cerelative inhibitione0
Direction
disturbancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Iron deficiency lead to cessation of growth of the apical meristem and disturbance in the mechanism of cerelative inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–717 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different branches of an iron-deficient peach plant showed highly unequal intensities of chlorosis.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Organ / stage
branchese0
Outcome
intensities of chlorosise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“Different branches of a plant showed highly inequal intensities of chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–795 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most severely chlorotic shoot of an iron-deficient peach plant was generally the central one.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
most severely affected shoote0
Qualifier
the central onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“The most severely affected shoot was generally the central one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–859 · show in text ↑

iron atom · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.