Abstract
Tissues of root and shoot systems of groundnut plants, inoculated with VAM alone, Rhizobium alone, VAM and Rhizobium (Dual inoculation) and uninoculated, were analysed for reducing and nonreducing sugars, starch, individual sugars, organic acids and p-amylase activity. Inoculated plants contained greater amounts of reducing, non-reducing sugars and lesser amounts of starch. There was no qualitative change in both sugars and organic acids -,md were more in inoculated plant tissues than in uninoculated plant tissues. The increase was more pronounced in dual inoculated plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated groundnut had more reducing and non-reducing sugars.
- Taxon
- GROUNDNUT
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- inoculated with VAM alone, Rhizobium alone, VAM and Rhizobium (Dual inoculation)e1
- Interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- reducing, non-reducing sugarse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- uninoculatede1
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculated plants contained greater amounts of reducing, non-reducing sugars”
e1“inoculated with VAM alone, Rhizobium alone, VAM and Rhizobium (Dual inoculation) and uninoculated”
t0“GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated groundnut had less starch.
- Taxon
- GROUNDNUTArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- inoculated with VAM alone, Rhizobium alone, VAM and Rhizobium (Dual inoculation)e1
- Interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- starche0
- Direction
- lessere0
- Comparator
- uninoculatede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculated plants contained greater amounts of reducing, non-reducing sugars and lesser amounts of starch”
e1“inoculated with VAM alone, Rhizobium alone, VAM and Rhizobium (Dual inoculation) and uninoculated”
t0“GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation did not qualitatively change sugars or organic acids.
- Taxon
- GROUNDNUTArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- inoculated with VAM alone, Rhizobium alone, VAM and Rhizobium (Dual inoculation)e1
- Interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- sugars and organic acidse0
- Direction
- no qualitative changee0
- Comparator
- uninoculatede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no qualitative change in both sugars and organic acids”
e1“inoculated with VAM alone, Rhizobium alone, VAM and Rhizobium (Dual inoculation) and uninoculated”
t0“GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated tissues had more organic acids, most strongly under dual inoculation.
- Taxon
- GROUNDNUTArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- VAM and Rhizobium (Dual inoculation)e1
- Interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- organic acidse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Qualifier
- more pronounced in dual inoculated plantse0
- Comparator
- uninoculatede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“organic acids -,md were more in inoculated plant tissues than in uninoculated plant tissues. The increase was more pronounced in dual inoculated plants”
e1“inoculated with VAM alone, Rhizobium alone, VAM and Rhizobium (Dual inoculation) and uninoculated”
t0“GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.