Paper · 1999 · Fujian nongye xuebao

Effect of VAM on formation of root apoplastic iron pool in peanut plant

Song Ya

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An investigation was carried out to test the effect of VAM on iron accumulation and mobilization in root apoplast, and it's role in improving iron nutrition of peanut Two treatments were set up, namely peanut inoculated without VAM, peanut inoculated with VAM Plants were grown in sandy soil in pots The results demonstrated that inoculated with VAM improved iron nutrition of peanut, the content of root apoplastic iron pool, the chlorophyll content of young leaves and iron content of shoot in peanut plant inoculated with VAM were all higher than those of plant inoculated without VAM

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM inoculation improved iron nutrition of peanut.

Treatment
inoculated with VAMe0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
iron nutritione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated with VAM improved iron nutrition of peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM inoculation increased the peanut root apoplastic iron pool relative to no VAM.

Treatment
inoculated with VAMe0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
content of root apoplastic iron poole0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plant inoculated without VAMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of root apoplastic iron pool, the chlorophyll content of young leaves and iron content of shoot in peanut plant inoculated with VAM were all higher than those of plant inoculated without VAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM inoculation increased chlorophyll content of young peanut leaves relative to no VAM.

Organ / stage
young leavese0
Treatment
inoculated with VAMe0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plant inoculated without VAMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of root apoplastic iron pool, the chlorophyll content of young leaves and iron content of shoot in peanut plant inoculated with VAM were all higher than those of plant inoculated without VAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM inoculation increased peanut shoot iron content relative to no VAM.

Treatment
inoculated with VAMe0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
iron content of shoote0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plant inoculated without VAMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of root apoplastic iron pool, the chlorophyll content of young leaves and iron content of shoot in peanut plant inoculated with VAM were all higher than those of plant inoculated without VAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–587 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 55 positive, 1 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.