Paper · 2005 · Acta Horticulturae

RESPONSE OF POTTED ROSE VARIETIES TO SHORT-TERM ETHYLENE EXPOSURE

R.T. Leonard; T.A. Nell; L. Høyer

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Postharvest longevity and sensitivity to short-term ethylene exposure of several miniature potted Parade ® rose varieties were investigated. Plants were treated with a continuous flow of 1µl l -1 ethylene for 24 h at 20° ° ° °C when plants were at marketable stage (3-5 open flowers). The reaction to the injurious effects of exogenous ethylene can occur after a short exposure time of 24 h with considerable variation found in the response among varieties. The varieties response to ethylene differed in the time it took for visible symptoms to appear, the amount of damage observed and the plant part affected (buds verses flowers). For most varieties, it took several days before the effects of ethylene were evident. The varieties ‘Charming’, ‘Fiesta’ and ‘Lady’ did not respond significantly to ethylene. These varieties, which have long lasting qualities under ethylene free conditions, withstood this amount of ethylene without visible symptoms. The other varieties had an increase in bud and/or flower damage when exposed to ethylene. The magnitude of ethylene effects and the plant part affected was found to be variety dependent. Short lasting varieties were consistently found to be sensitive to ethylene, while most, but not all, long lasting varieties were tolerant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injury after 24-hour ethylene exposure varied substantially among rose varieties.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Treatment
exogenous ethylenee0
Outcome
injurious effectse0
Qualifier
24 he0

Verbatim

e0

“The reaction to the injurious effects of exogenous ethylene can occur after a short exposure time of 24 h with considerable variation found in the response among varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTTED ROSE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties differed in symptom timing, damage amount and affected buds or flowers.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Organ / stage
buds verses flowerse0
Treatment
ethylenee0
Outcome
time it took for visible symptoms to appear, the amount of damage observed and the plant part affectede0

Verbatim

e0

“The varieties response to ethylene differed in the time it took for visible symptoms to appear, the amount of damage observed and the plant part affected (buds verses flowers).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTTED ROSE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene effects became evident only after several days in most varieties.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Treatment
ethylenee0
Outcome
effects of ethylene were evidente0
Value
several dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“For most varieties, it took several days before the effects of ethylene were evident.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTTED ROSE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Charming showed no significant response or visible symptoms after ethylene exposure.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Material
Charminge0
Treatment
ethylenee0
Outcome
without visible symptomse0
Direction
did not respond significantlye0
Comparator
ethylene free conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The varieties ‘Charming’, ‘Fiesta’ and ‘Lady’ did not respond significantly to ethylene. These varieties, which have long lasting qualities under ethylene free conditions, withstood this amount of ethylene without visible symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTTED ROSE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiesta showed no significant response or visible symptoms after ethylene exposure.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Material
Fiestae0
Treatment
ethylenee0
Outcome
without visible symptomse0
Direction
did not respond significantlye0
Comparator
ethylene free conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The varieties ‘Charming’, ‘Fiesta’ and ‘Lady’ did not respond significantly to ethylene. These varieties, which have long lasting qualities under ethylene free conditions, withstood this amount of ethylene without visible symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTTED ROSE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lady showed no significant response or visible symptoms after ethylene exposure.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Material
Ladye0
Treatment
ethylenee0
Outcome
without visible symptomse0
Direction
did not respond significantlye0
Comparator
ethylene free conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The varieties ‘Charming’, ‘Fiesta’ and ‘Lady’ did not respond significantly to ethylene. These varieties, which have long lasting qualities under ethylene free conditions, withstood this amount of ethylene without visible symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTTED ROSE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other rose varieties had increased bud or flower damage after ethylene exposure.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Treatment
ethylenee0
Outcome
bud and/or flower damagee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The other varieties had an increase in bud and/or flower damage when exposed to ethylene.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTTED ROSE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-lasting varieties were consistently ethylene sensitive, while most long-lasting varieties were tolerant.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Material
Short lasting varietiese0
Outcome
sensitive to ethylenee0
Comparator
long lasting varietiese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Short lasting varieties were consistently found to be sensitive to ethylene, while most, but not all, long lasting varieties were tolerant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTTED ROSE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–33 · show in text ↑

ethene · pest · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

ethene · disease · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.