Paper · 2010 · HortScience

Genotypic Variation in the Postharvest Performance and Ethylene Sensitivity of Cut Rose Flowers

Andrew J. Macnish; Ria T. Leonard; Ana Maria Borda; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
63
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Natural variation in the postharvest quality and longevity of ornamental plants can often be related to differences in their response to ethylene. In the present study, we determined the postharvest performance and ethylene sensitivity of cut flowers from 38 cultivated Hybrid Tea rose genotypes. The vase life of the cultivars varied considerably from 4.5 to 18.8 days at 21 °C. There was also substantial variation in the degree of flower opening among genotypes. Exposure to 1 μL·L −1 ethylene for 24 h at 21 °C reduced the longevity of 27 cultivars by 0.8 to 8.4 days (18% to 47%) by accelerating petal wilting and abscission. Ethylene treatment also significantly reduced rates of flower opening in 17 sensitive cultivars and in six cultivars that showed no ethylene-related reduction in vase life. Five cultivars showed no reduction in vase life or flower opening in response to ethylene exposure. Pre-treating stems with 0.2 m m silver thiosulfate liquid or 0.9 μL·L −1 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) gas for 16 h at 2 °C reduced the deleterious effects of ethylene. The release of 1-MCP from two sachets containing EthylBloc™ into individual shipping boxes also protected flowers against ethylene applied immediately after a 6-d commercial shipment. The duration of protection afforded by the 1-MCP sachet treatment was greatest when flowers were maintained at low temperature.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rose cultivars varied in vase life from 4.5 to 18.8 days at 21 °C.

Taxon
Roset0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Value
4.5 to 18.8 dayse0
Qualifier
21 °Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“The vase life of the cultivars varied considerably from 4.5 to 18.8 days at 21 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rose genotypes varied substantially in flower opening.

Taxon
Roset0
Outcome
degree of flower openinge0

Verbatim

e0

“substantial variation in the degree of flower opening among genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene exposure shortened vase life in 27 rose cultivars by 0.8 to 8.4 days.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
1 μL·L −1 ethylene for 24 h at 21 °Ce0
Outcome
longevitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.8 to 8.4 dayse0
Qualifier
27 cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to 1 μL·L −1 ethylene for 24 h at 21 °C reduced the longevity of 27 cultivars by 0.8 to 8.4 days (18% to 47%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene accelerated petal wilting and abscission.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
ethylenee1
Outcome
petal wilting and abscissione0
Direction
acceleratinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“by accelerating petal wilting and abscission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Exposure to 1 μL·L −1 ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene significantly reduced flower opening rates in 17 sensitive cultivars.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
Ethylene treatmente0
Outcome
rates of flower openinge0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
17 sensitive cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene treatment also significantly reduced rates of flower opening in 17 sensitive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene reduced flower opening in six cultivars without a vase-life reduction.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
Ethylene treatmente1
Outcome
rates of flower openinge1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
six cultivars that showed no ethylene-related reduction in vase lifee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in six cultivars that showed no ethylene-related reduction in vase life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–802 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethylene treatment also significantly reduced rates of flower opening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five cultivars had no vase-life reduction after ethylene exposure.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
ethylene exposuree0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
no reductione0
Qualifier
Five cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Five cultivars showed no reduction in vase life or flower opening in response to ethylene exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five cultivars had no reduction in flower opening after ethylene exposure.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
ethylene exposuree0
Outcome
flower openinge0
Direction
no reductione0
Qualifier
Five cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Five cultivars showed no reduction in vase life or flower opening in response to ethylene exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver thiosulfate pretreatment reduced ethylene damage to cut roses.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
0.2 m m silver thiosulfate liquide0
Outcome
deleterious effects of ethylenee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
for 16 h at 2 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-treating stems with 0.2 m m silver thiosulfate liquid or 0.9 μL·L −1 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) gas for 16 h at 2 °C reduced the deleterious effects of ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP gas pretreatment reduced ethylene damage to cut roses.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
0.9 μL·L −1 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) gase0
Outcome
deleterious effects of ethylenee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-treating stems with 0.2 m m silver thiosulfate liquid or 0.9 μL·L −1 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) gas for 16 h at 2 °C reduced the deleterious effects of ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP sachets protected shipped roses against ethylene immediately after six days of shipment.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
two sachets containing EthylBloc™e0
Outcome
protected flowers against ethylenee0
Qualifier
immediately after a 6-d commercial shipmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The release of 1-MCP from two sachets containing EthylBloc™ into individual shipping boxes also protected flowers against ethylene applied immediately after a 6-d commercial shipment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature extended the duration of protection from 1-MCP sachets.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
low temperaturee0
Outcome
duration of protectione0
Direction
greateste0

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of protection afforded by the 1-MCP sachet treatment was greatest when flowers were maintained at low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑

ethene · quality: postharvest · RosaResults differ

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · RosaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ethene · pest · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

silver atom · physiology: hormones · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiosulfate · physiology: hormones · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ethene · disease · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.