Abstract
A study on the pattern of nutrients removal by weed species in wheat under different cultural and chemical methods of weed control revealed that closer row spacing and cross sowing caused maximum reduction in nutrients uptake of Vida sativa L. and Lathyrus aphaca L. followed by Phalaris minor Retz. and Avena ludoviciana Dur. and was least affected in other weed species. This lead to increase in nutrients uptake by wheat. Higher seed fate and isoproturon (0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha) reduced cosiderably the nutrients uptake by P. minor and A. Tudoviciana as compared to other weed species, which subsequently increased the nutrients uptake by the crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Closer row spacing and cross sowing maximally reduced nutrient uptake of Vida sativa L. and Lathyrus aphaca L.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- closer row spacing and cross sowinge0
- Interactor
- Vida sativa L. and Lathyrus aphaca L.e0weed
- Outcome
- nutrients uptake of Vida sativa L. and Lathyrus aphaca L.e0
- Direction
- maximum reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“closer row spacing and cross sowing caused maximum reduction in nutrients uptake of Vida sativa L. and Lathyrus aphaca L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Closer row spacing and cross sowing reduced nutrient uptake of Phalaris minor Retz. and Avena ludoviciana Dur. to a lesser extent.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- closer row spacing and cross sowinge0
- Interactor
- Phalaris minor Retz. and Avena ludoviciana Dur.
.jpg?width=60)
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana.jpg?width=60)
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- Phalaris minor Retz. and Avena ludoviciana Dur.e0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“closer row spacing and cross sowing caused maximum reduction in nutrients uptake of Vida sativa L. and Lathyrus aphaca L. followed by Phalaris minor Retz. and Avena ludoviciana Dur.”
Claim · model-written summary
Those cultural controls increased wheat nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- closer row spacing and cross sowinge0
- Outcome
- nutrients uptake by wheate1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“closer row spacing and cross sowing caused maximum reduction in nutrients uptake”
e1“This lead to increase in nutrients uptake by wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher seed fate and isoproturon reduced nutrient uptake by P. minor and A. Tudoviciana.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Higher seed fate and isoproturon (0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha)e0
- Interactor
- P. minor and A. Tudovicianae0weed
- Outcome
- nutrients uptake by P. minor and A. Tudovicianae0
- Direction
- reduced cosiderablye0
- Comparator
- other weed speciese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“Higher seed fate and isoproturon (0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha) reduced cosiderably the nutrients uptake by P. minor and A. Tudoviciana as compared to other weed species”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher seed fate and isoproturon subsequently increased crop nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Higher seed fate and isoproturon (0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha)e0
- Outcome
- nutrients uptake by the crope1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“Higher seed fate and isoproturon (0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha)”
e1“which subsequently increased the nutrients uptake by the crop.”
The same questions in other papers
isoproturon · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →density · Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
density · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →density · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.