Paper · 2010 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.

Anil Khokhar; V. Nepalia

14
claims
42
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Isoproturon, clodinafop and sulfosulfuron alone at 750, 60 and 30 g/ha, respectively, and tank mixture of isoproturon at 500 g/ha + 2, 4-D at 500 g/ha, isoproturon at 500 g/ha + clodinafop at 30 g/ha and isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha were evaluated against mixed weed flora in wheat. All the herbicide treatments significantly reduced the dry weight of complex weeds, although they differed in their effect on weed species. While sulfosulfuron and clodinafop alone and as a tank mixture with isoproturon effectively controlled grassy weeds than all other herbicide treatments, the tank mix application of isoproturon at 500 g/ha + 2, 4-D at 500 g/ha and isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha were equally effective against broadleaf weeds. The broadleaf weeds being dominant in the experimental field, the overall weed density and dry matter production at different stages of crop growth were minimized by isoproturon at 500 g/ha+sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha and isoproturon at 500 g/ha+2, 4-D at 500 g/ha. Uninterrupted weed growth depleted 20.97 kg N, 3.13 kg P and 26.94 kg K/ha, while it was lowest with isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha. Maximum uptake of N (150.20 kg/ha), P (41.00 kg/ha) and K (194.14 kg/ha) by wheat crop was in plots treated with tank mixture of isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha, while in weedy check plots N, P and K uptake by crop was 87.87, 23.82 and 118.04 kg/ha, respectively. Uncontrolled weeds in weedy check plots reduced wheat yield by 31.4% as compared to herbicide treated plots. Highest grain yield obtained with isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha (58 q/ha) followed by isoproturon at 500 g/ha + 2, 4-D at 500 g/ha (55.34 q/ha) was significantly higher than all other treatments. Among nutrient management treatments, application of 75% RDF+vermicompost at 1.5 t/ha and 50% RDF + vermicompost at 3.0 t/ha resulted in significant increase in weed dry matter, NPK uptake, chlorophyll and protein content and grain and straw yield over RDF alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced weed dry weight.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Interactor
complex weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of complex weedse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the herbicide treatments significantly reduced the dry weight of complex weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron and clodinafop controlled grassy weeds.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron and clodinafop alone and as a tank mixture with isoproturone0
Interactor
grassy weedse0weed
Outcome
grassy weedse0
Direction
effectively controllede0
Comparator
all other herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfosulfuron and clodinafop alone and as a tank mixture with isoproturon effectively controlled grassy weeds than all other herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two tank mixtures controlled broadleaf weeds equally.

Treatment
isoproturon at 500 g/ha + 2, 4-D at 500 g/ha and isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/hae0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
broadleaf weedse0
Direction
equally effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tank mix application of isoproturon at 500 g/ha + 2, 4-D at 500 g/ha and isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha were equally effective against broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two tank mixtures minimized weed density and dry matter.

Treatment
isoproturon at 500 g/ha+sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha and isoproturon at 500 g/ha+2, 4-D at 500 g/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
overall weed density and dry matter productione0
Direction
minimizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the overall weed density and dry matter production at different stages of crop growth were minimized by isoproturon at 500 g/ha+sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha and isoproturon at 500 g/ha+2, 4-D at 500 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninterrupted weeds depleted N, P and K.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growth depleted 20.97 kg N, 3.13 kg P and 26.94 kg K/hae0
Direction
depletede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uninterrupted weed growth depleted 20.97 kg N, 3.13 kg P and 26.94 kg K/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isoproturon-sulfosulfuron mix gave maximum wheat N uptake.

Treatment
isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/hae0
Outcome
uptake of Ne0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
150.20 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum uptake of N (150.20 kg/ha), P (41.00 kg/ha) and K (194.14 kg/ha) by wheat crop was in plots treated with tank mixture of isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mix gave maximum wheat P uptake.

Treatment
isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/hae0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
41.00 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum uptake of N (150.20 kg/ha), P (41.00 kg/ha) and K (194.14 kg/ha) by wheat crop was in plots treated with tank mixture of isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mix gave maximum wheat K uptake.

Treatment
isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/hae0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
194.14 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum uptake of N (150.20 kg/ha), P (41.00 kg/ha) and K (194.14 kg/ha) by wheat crop was in plots treated with tank mixture of isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncontrolled weeds reduced wheat yield by 31.4%.

Treatment
Uncontrolled weedse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
31.4%e0
Comparator
herbicide treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uncontrolled weeds in weedy check plots reduced wheat yield by 31.4% as compared to herbicide treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The isoproturon-sulfosulfuron mix had highest grain yield of 58 q/ha.

Treatment
isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
58 q/hae0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield obtained with isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha (58 q/ha) followed by isoproturon at 500 g/ha + 2, 4-D at 500 g/ha (55.34 q/ha) was significantly higher than all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The isoproturon-2,4-D mix yielded 55.34 q/ha.

Treatment
isoproturon at 500 g/ha + 2, 4-D at 500 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
55.34 q/hae0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield obtained with isoproturon at 500 g/ha + sulfosulfuron at 15 g/ha (58 q/ha) followed by isoproturon at 500 g/ha + 2, 4-D at 500 g/ha (55.34 q/ha) was significantly higher than all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost nutrient treatments increased weed dry matter and NPK uptake.

Treatment
75% RDF+vermicompost at 1.5 t/ha and 50% RDF + vermicompost at 3.0 t/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry matter, NPK uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
RDF alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF+vermicompost at 1.5 t/ha and 50% RDF + vermicompost at 3.0 t/ha resulted in significant increase in weed dry matter, NPK uptake, chlorophyll and protein content and grain and straw yield over RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–2061 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost nutrient treatments increased chlorophyll and protein content.

Treatment
75% RDF+vermicompost at 1.5 t/ha and 50% RDF + vermicompost at 3.0 t/hae0
Outcome
chlorophyll and protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
RDF alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF+vermicompost at 1.5 t/ha and 50% RDF + vermicompost at 3.0 t/ha resulted in significant increase in weed dry matter, NPK uptake, chlorophyll and protein content and grain and straw yield over RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–2061 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost nutrient treatments increased grain and straw yield.

Treatment
75% RDF+vermicompost at 1.5 t/ha and 50% RDF + vermicompost at 3.0 t/hae0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
RDF alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF+vermicompost at 1.5 t/ha and 50% RDF + vermicompost at 3.0 t/ha resulted in significant increase in weed dry matter, NPK uptake, chlorophyll and protein content and grain and straw yield over RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–2061 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effect of herbicides and nutrient management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

isoproturon · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.