Paper · 1988 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed and Nitrogen Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh1

D. R. Thakur; Kuldeep Singh

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In field experiments conducted during Rabi 1981–82 and 1982–83 it was observed that isoproiuron at 1.25 kg/ha as post-emergence at 2–3 leaf stage of weeds gave better control of weeds as compared to methabenzthiazuron at all the levels in both the seasons. Even the application of isoprotui on at 0.75 kg/ha resulted in effective control of weeds identical to that of methabenzthiazuron at 1.75 kg/ha. The losses of N, P and K were highest in weedy plots, w ereas, weed free and isoproturon ai 1.25 kg/ha being on par with each other recorded significantly lowest nutrient depletion by weeds and higher grain yield than rest of the treatments. Higher net returns were also obtained with isoproiuron 1.25 kg/ha and weed free treatments, while no weeding resulted in a net loss of Rs. 566/ha. Herbicide treated plots when supplied with 100 kg N/ha gave significantly higher net returns over 50 kg N/ha, however, no such differences were observed in weed free and weedy plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 1.25 kg/ha applied post-emergence gave better weed control than methabenzthiazuron at all levels.

Treatment
isoproiuron at 1.25 kg/ha as post-emergencee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of weedse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
methabenzthiazurone0
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“In field experiments conducted during Rabi 1981–82 and 1982–83 it was observed that isoproiuron at 1.25 kg/ha as post-emergence at 2–3 leaf stage of weeds gave better control of weeds as compared to methabenzthiazuron at all the levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 0.75 kg/ha gave effective weed control identical to methabenzthiazuron at 1.75 kg/ha.

Treatment
isoprotui on at 0.75 kg/hae1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
effective control of weedse1
Direction
identicale1
Comparator
methabenzthiazuron at 1.75 kg/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Even the application of isoprotui on at 0.75 kg/ha resulted in effective control of weeds identical to that of methabenzthiazuron at 1.75 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Losses of N, P and K were highest in weedy plots.

Treatment
weedy plotse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
losses of N, P and Ke2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
weed freee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“The losses of N, P and K were highest in weedy plots, w ereas, weed free and isoproturon ai 1.25 kg/ha being on par with each other recorded significantly lowest nutrient depletion by weeds and higher grain yield than rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed free plots and isoproturon at 1.25 kg/ha had significantly lowest nutrient depletion by weeds.

Treatment
weed free and isoproturon ai 1.25 kg/hae2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
nutrient depletione2
Direction
loweste2
Comparator
weedy plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“The losses of N, P and K were highest in weedy plots, w ereas, weed free and isoproturon ai 1.25 kg/ha being on par with each other recorded significantly lowest nutrient depletion by weeds and higher grain yield than rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed free plots and isoproturon at 1.25 kg/ha gave higher grain yield than the rest of the treatments.

Treatment
weed free and isoproturon ai 1.25 kg/hae2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“The losses of N, P and K were highest in weedy plots, w ereas, weed free and isoproturon ai 1.25 kg/ha being on par with each other recorded significantly lowest nutrient depletion by weeds and higher grain yield than rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 1.25 kg/ha and weed free treatments gave higher net returns.

Treatment
isoproiuron 1.25 kg/ha and weed free treatmentse3
Outcome
net returnse3
Direction
Highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“Higher net returns were also obtained with isoproiuron 1.25 kg/ha and weed free treatments, while no weeding resulted in a net loss of Rs. 566/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–789 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No weeding resulted in a net loss of Rs. 566/ha.

Outcome
net losse3
Value
Rs. 566/hae3
Qualifier
no weedinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“Higher net returns were also obtained with isoproiuron 1.25 kg/ha and weed free treatments, while no weeding resulted in a net loss of Rs. 566/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide-treated plots supplied with 100 kg N/ha gave significantly higher net returns than with 50 kg N/ha.

Treatment
100 kg N/hae4
Outcome
net returnse4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
Herbicide treated plotse4
Comparator
50 kg N/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“Herbicide treated plots when supplied with 100 kg N/ha gave significantly higher net returns over 50 kg N/ha, however, no such differences were observed in weed free and weedy plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No such differences in net returns between 100 and 50 kg N/ha were observed in weed free and weedy plots.

Treatment
100 kg N/hae4
Outcome
net returnse4
Direction
no such differencese4
Qualifier
weed free and weedy plotse4
Comparator
50 kg N/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“Herbicide treated plots when supplied with 100 kg N/ha gave significantly higher net returns over 50 kg N/ha, however, no such differences were observed in weed free and weedy plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–972 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

isoproturon · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.