Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed free plots and isoproturon at 1.25 kg/ha had significantly lowest nutrient depletion by weeds.

A claim from Weed and Nitrogen Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh1 · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed free plots and isoproturon at 1.25 kg/ha had significantly lowest nutrient depletion by weeds.

Treatment
weed free and isoproturon ai 1.25 kg/hae2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
nutrient depletione2
Direction
loweste2
Comparator
weedy plotse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–63
e2

“The losses of N, P and K were highest in weedy plots, w ereas, weed free and isoproturon ai 1.25 kg/ha being on par with each other recorded significantly lowest nutrient depletion by weeds and higher grain yield than rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–642

Title

Weed and Nitrogen Management in Wheat under Mid-Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh1

D. R. Thakur; Kuldeep Singh Indian Journal of Weed Science 1988

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-eb78e7fb8d68bb9fe0c570b52eea229d219728d7278ffe13be4893689c153b96 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

isoproturon · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.