Abstract
A study was conducted at Regional Research Station, Bathinda to determine the effect of different pruning intensities on yield and fruit quality of ber cv. Umran. The secondary branches of ber trees were pruned at 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 bud levels and control i.e., no pruning. The fruit yield decreased with the increase in intensity of pruning. The maximum fruit weight and fruit size in terms of fruit length and fruit breadth was obtained in trees pruned at 8th bud level followed by the trees pruned at 10th level and minimum in the trees kept under control. The pulp percentage and pulp stone ratio was maximum in the fruit of the trees pruned at 8th bud level. TSS content was maximum in the fruits pruned at 8th bud levels followed by 10th and 12th bud levels and minimum under control. The acid content of the fruits was also not influenced by pruning intensities.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield fell as pruning intensity increased.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Treatment
- intensity of pruninge0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The fruit yield decreased with the increase in intensity of pruning”
t0“ber”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight was greatest after pruning at the eighth bud.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Treatment
- pruned at 8th bud levele0
- Outcome
- fruit weighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The maximum fruit weight and fruit size in terms of fruit length and fruit breadth was obtained in trees pruned at 8th bud level followed by the trees pruned at 10th level and minimum in the trees kept under control”
t0“ber”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit length and breadth were greatest after pruning at the eighth bud.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Treatment
- pruned at 8th bud levele0
- Outcome
- fruit length and fruit breadthe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The maximum fruit weight and fruit size in terms of fruit length and fruit breadth was obtained in trees pruned at 8th bud level followed by the trees pruned at 10th level and minimum in the trees kept under control”
t0“ber”
Claim · model-written summary
Pulp percentage and pulp to stone ratio were greatest after pruning at the eighth bud.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Treatment
- pruned at 8th bud levele0
- Outcome
- pulp percentage and pulp stone ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The pulp percentage and pulp stone ratio was maximum in the fruit of the trees pruned at 8th bud level”
t0“ber”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit TSS content was greatest at the eighth bud pruning level.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Treatment
- pruned at 8th bud levelse0
- Outcome
- TSS contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“TSS content was maximum in the fruits pruned at 8th bud levels followed by 10th and 12th bud levels and minimum under control”
t0“ber”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning intensity did not influence fruit acid content.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Treatment
- pruning intensitiese0
- Outcome
- acid contente0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The acid content of the fruits was also not influenced by pruning intensities”
t0“ber”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · quality: sugar starch · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →pruning · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.