Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology

Effect of intensity of pruning on yield and fruit quality of ber (Ziziphus mauritianaL) cv. Umran

Navjot Gupta; MS Gill

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted at Regional Research Station, Bathinda to determine the effect of different pruning intensities on yield and fruit quality of ber cv. Umran. The secondary branches of ber trees were pruned at 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 bud levels and control i.e., no pruning. The fruit yield decreased with the increase in intensity of pruning. The maximum fruit weight and fruit size in terms of fruit length and fruit breadth was obtained in trees pruned at 8th bud level followed by the trees pruned at 10th level and minimum in the trees kept under control. The pulp percentage and pulp stone ratio was maximum in the fruit of the trees pruned at 8th bud level. TSS content was maximum in the fruits pruned at 8th bud levels followed by 10th and 12th bud levels and minimum under control. The acid content of the fruits was also not influenced by pruning intensities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield fell as pruning intensity increased.

Treatment
intensity of pruninge0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit yield decreased with the increase in intensity of pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–338 · show in text ↑
t0

“ber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight was greatest after pruning at the eighth bud.

Treatment
pruned at 8th bud levele0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum fruit weight and fruit size in terms of fruit length and fruit breadth was obtained in trees pruned at 8th bud level followed by the trees pruned at 10th level and minimum in the trees kept under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“ber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit length and breadth were greatest after pruning at the eighth bud.

Treatment
pruned at 8th bud levele0
Outcome
fruit length and fruit breadthe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum fruit weight and fruit size in terms of fruit length and fruit breadth was obtained in trees pruned at 8th bud level followed by the trees pruned at 10th level and minimum in the trees kept under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“ber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulp percentage and pulp to stone ratio were greatest after pruning at the eighth bud.

Treatment
pruned at 8th bud levele0
Outcome
pulp percentage and pulp stone ratioe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pulp percentage and pulp stone ratio was maximum in the fruit of the trees pruned at 8th bud level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“ber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit TSS content was greatest at the eighth bud pruning level.

Treatment
pruned at 8th bud levelse0
Outcome
TSS contente0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TSS content was maximum in the fruits pruned at 8th bud levels followed by 10th and 12th bud levels and minimum under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“ber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning intensity did not influence fruit acid content.

Treatment
pruning intensitiese0
Outcome
acid contente0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The acid content of the fruits was also not influenced by pruning intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“ber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–64 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.