Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Assess the Effect of Pruning and Plant Growth Regulators on Yield and Quality of Ber Fruit

Sneha Singh; Bhanu Pratap; Sachi Gupta; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present study was conducted with objective to know the effect of different pruning intensity and plant growth regulators on yield and quality of Gola cultivar. The present was comprised four different pruning intensity of previous season growth viz., P0 – no pruning, P1- 25 % pruning, P2- 50 % pruning, P3- 75 % pruning and plant growth regulators viz., C0-control, C1- GA3 @ 10 ppm and C2- NAA @10 ppm. Significantly higher fruit weight (23.69 g) has been recorded with 75% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppm followed by 75% pruning intensity + GA₃ 10 ppm and least being in control. The highest fruit length, volume and width has been measured with 75% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppm and lowest were in control. The maximum fruit yield (110.54 kg/plant) has been achieved by employing 50% severity of pruning with NAA 10ppm which found significantly superior over 25% pruning intensity+ NAA 10ppm and control. The highest severity of pruning (75%) has been adjudged as supra-optimal level of pruning severity (negative effect) in increasing fruit yield. Significantly higher total soluble solid has been analyzed in fruits with 50% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppm followed by 50% pruning intensity + GA₃ 10 ppm and lowest noted in control, while pulp : stone ratio was significantly by various pruning intensities and plant growth regulators and recorded maximum in 75% pruning + 10 ppm NAA followed by 75% pruning + GA₃. The maximum vitamin C content in fruits have been analyzed by 50% severity of pruning + NAA 10ppm followed by 50% pruning intensity + GA₃ 10 ppm with value was observed significant, while acidity of fruits were significant. The highest TSS : Acid ratio, reducing and non-reducing sugar and total sugar of fruits have been analyzed by 50% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppm and lowest one in control but variations were found significant in above all biochemical parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75% pruning with NAA 10ppm gave significantly higher fruit weight of 23.69 g.

Treatment
75% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppme0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.69 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher fruit weight (23.69 g) has been recorded with 75% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppm followed by 75% pruning intensity + GA₃ 10 ppm and least being in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% pruning with NAA 10ppm produced the highest fruit length, volume and width.

Treatment
75% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppme0
Outcome
fruit length, volume and widthe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fruit length, volume and width has been measured with 75% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppm and lowest were in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% pruning with NAA 10ppm yielded the maximum 110.54 kg/plant, significantly above 25% pruning with NAA and control.

Treatment
50% severity of pruning with NAA 10ppme0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
110.54 kg/plante0
Comparator
25% pruning intensity+ NAA 10ppm and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum fruit yield (110.54 kg/plant) has been achieved by employing 50% severity of pruning with NAA 10ppm which found significantly superior over 25% pruning intensity+ NAA 10ppm and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% pruning was judged supra-optimal and detrimental to fruit yield.

Treatment
pruning (75%)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
negative effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest severity of pruning (75%) has been adjudged as supra-optimal level of pruning severity (negative effect) in increasing fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% pruning with NAA 10ppm gave significantly higher fruit total soluble solid content.

Treatment
50% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppme0
Outcome
total soluble solide0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher total soluble solid has been analyzed in fruits with 50% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppm followed by 50% pruning intensity + GA₃ 10 ppm and lowest noted in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The pulp to stone ratio was highest with 75% pruning and 10 ppm NAA.

Treatment
75% pruning + 10 ppm NAAe0
Outcome
pulp : stone ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
75% pruning + GA₃e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pulp : stone ratio was significantly by various pruning intensities and plant growth regulators and recorded maximum in 75% pruning + 10 ppm NAA followed by 75% pruning + GA₃.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C content was highest with 50% pruning and NAA 10ppm.

Treatment
50% severity of pruning + NAA 10ppme0
Outcome
vitamin C content in fruitse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
50% pruning intensity + GA₃ 10 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum vitamin C content in fruits have been analyzed by 50% severity of pruning + NAA 10ppm followed by 50% pruning intensity + GA₃ 10 ppm with value was observed significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit acidity differed significantly among treatments.

Outcome
acidity of fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while acidity of fruits were significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The TSS to acid ratio was highest with 50% pruning and NAA 10ppm.

Treatment
50% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppme0
Outcome
TSS : Acid ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest TSS : Acid ratio, reducing and non-reducing sugar and total sugar of fruits have been analyzed by 50% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppm and lowest one in control but variations were found significant in above all biochemical parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing, non-reducing and total fruit sugar were highest with 50% pruning and NAA 10ppm.

Treatment
50% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppme0
Outcome
reducing and non-reducing sugar and total sugar of fruitse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest TSS : Acid ratio, reducing and non-reducing sugar and total sugar of fruits have been analyzed by 50% pruning intensity + NAA 10ppm and lowest one in control but variations were found significant in above all biochemical parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ber Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: sugar starch · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.