Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of foliar application of GA3 and NAA on yield and quality of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. “Banarasi Karaka”

Swatantra Yadav; JP Singh; Ankit Verma; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The investigation was conducted at Horticulture Garden CSA University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur during the year 2020-21. The experiment entitled ‘effect of foliar application of GA3 and NAA on yield and quality of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka’. The sprays of 30 ppm NAA significantly maximized (4.24 cm) length of fruit against control (N0) recorded 3.91 cm length. GA3 20 ppm significantly enhanced (4.48 cm) fruit length and the minimum of 3.86 cm showed under control. Significantly maximum 2.58 cm diameter obtain with NAA 30 ppm followed by NAA 40 ppm (2.46 cm) over control (N0) revealed 2.19 cm diameter. GA3 20 ppm significantly revealed 2.62 cm diameter against control (2.23 cm). Significantly maximum of 2.74 cm diameter exhibited under interactive treatment N2 G1 followed by N3 G1 (2.70 cm) against control 2.17 cm. NAA 20 ppm maximized of 14.57g fruit weight being significant against the minimum of 13.31g fruit weight indicated with control (N0). GA3 20 ppm significantly enhanced (14.60g) fruit weight against control (G0) (13.38 g) interactive treatment N1 G1 induced significantly maximum 15.87 g fruit weight against control N0 G0 (12.96 g). The yield was significantly increase under NAA 30 ppm dose (34.16 kg/tree) followed by NAA 40 ppm (33.36 kg/tree) against control (27.60 kg). Treatment of GA3 40 ppm significantly maximum (37.63 kg/tree) yield over control G0 (26.31 kg). Interactive treatment N2 G3 maximized (42.48 kg yield/tree) followed by N3 G3 (41.20 kg) over control N0 G0 (25.54 kg). NAA 40 ppm induced significantly maximum of 14.18 0Brix TSS content against control N0 (12.82 0Brix). GA3 20 ppm dose significantly improved (14.03 0Brix) TSS content over control G0 (13.13 0Brix). Significantly maximum of 15.14 0Brix TSS content was revealed with interactive treatment N3 G1 against control N0 G0 (12.82 0Brix). Treatment of NAA 20 ppm significantly maximized (107.78 mg/100g pulp) ascorbic acid over control N0 (86.26 mg). GA3 40 ppm significantly induced the maximum 107.50 mg ascorbic acid content/ 100g pulp against control G0 (75.71 mg). The maximum of 128.56 mg ascorbic acid was recorded under interactive treatment of N1 G3 over control N0 G0 (75.29 mg).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30 ppm NAA maximized ber fruit length at 4.24 cm, against control at 3.91 cm.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
30 ppm NAAe2
Outcome
length of fruite2
Direction
maximizede2
Value
4.24 cme2
Qualifier
3.91 cme2
Comparator
control (N0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“The sprays of 30 ppm NAA significantly maximized (4.24 cm) length of fruit against control (N0) recorded 3.91 cm length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 20 ppm GA3 enhanced ber fruit length at 4.48 cm, against control at 3.86 cm.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 20 ppme2
Outcome
fruit lengthe2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
4.48 cme2
Qualifier
3.86 cme2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“GA3 20 ppm significantly enhanced (4.48 cm) fruit length and the minimum of 3.86 cm showed under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30 ppm NAA maximized ber fruit diameter at 2.58 cm, against control at 2.19 cm.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
NAA 30 ppme2
Outcome
diametere2
Direction
maximume2
Value
2.58 cme2
Qualifier
2.19 cme2
Comparator
control (N0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly maximum 2.58 cm diameter obtain with NAA 30 ppm followed by NAA 40 ppm (2.46 cm) over control (N0) revealed 2.19 cm diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 20 ppm GA3 revealed ber fruit diameter of 2.62 cm, against control at 2.23 cm.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 20 ppme2
Outcome
diametere2
Direction
revealede2
Value
2.62 cme2
Qualifier
2.23 cme2
Comparator
control (2.23 cm)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“GA3 20 ppm significantly revealed 2.62 cm diameter against control (2.23 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interactive treatment N2 G1 maximized ber fruit diameter at 2.74 cm, against control at 2.17 cm.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
interactive treatment N2 G1e2
Outcome
diametere2
Direction
maximume2
Value
2.74 cme2
Qualifier
2.17 cme2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly maximum of 2.74 cm diameter exhibited under interactive treatment N2 G1 followed by N3 G1 (2.70 cm) against control 2.17 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 20 ppm NAA maximized ber fruit weight at 14.57 g, against control at 13.31 g.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
NAA 20 ppme2
Outcome
fruit weighte2
Direction
maximizede2
Value
14.57ge2
Qualifier
13.31ge2
Comparator
control (N0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“NAA 20 ppm maximized of 14.57g fruit weight being significant against the minimum of 13.31g fruit weight indicated with control (N0).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 20 ppm GA3 enhanced ber fruit weight at 14.60 g, against control at 13.38 g.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 20 ppme2
Outcome
fruit weighte2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
14.60ge2
Qualifier
13.38 ge2
Comparator
control (G0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“GA3 20 ppm significantly enhanced (14.60g) fruit weight against control (G0) (13.38 g) interactive treatment N1 G1 induced significantly maximum 15.87 g fruit weight against control N0 G0 (12.96 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interactive treatment N1 G1 maximized ber fruit weight at 15.87 g, against control at 12.96 g.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
interactive treatment N1 G1e2
Outcome
fruit weighte2
Direction
maximume2
Value
15.87 ge2
Qualifier
12.96 ge2
Comparator
control N0 G0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“GA3 20 ppm significantly enhanced (14.60g) fruit weight against control (G0) (13.38 g) interactive treatment N1 G1 induced significantly maximum 15.87 g fruit weight against control N0 G0 (12.96 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30 ppm NAA significantly increased ber yield to 34.16 kg per tree, against control at 27.60 kg.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
NAA 30 ppm dosee2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
significantly increasee2
Value
34.16 kg/treee2
Qualifier
27.60 kge2
Comparator
control (27.60 kg)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield was significantly increase under NAA 30 ppm dose (34.16 kg/tree) followed by NAA 40 ppm (33.36 kg/tree) against control (27.60 kg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 40 ppm GA3 gave the maximum ber yield of 37.63 kg per tree, against control at 26.31 kg.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 40 ppme2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
37.63 kg/treee2
Qualifier
26.31 kge2
Comparator
control G0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment of GA3 40 ppm significantly maximum (37.63 kg/tree) yield over control G0 (26.31 kg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interactive treatment N2 G3 maximized ber yield at 42.48 kg per tree, against control at 25.54 kg.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
Interactive treatment N2 G3e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
maximizede2
Value
42.48 kg yield/treee2
Qualifier
25.54 kge2
Comparator
control N0 G0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“Interactive treatment N2 G3 maximized (42.48 kg yield/tree) followed by N3 G3 (41.20 kg) over control N0 G0 (25.54 kg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 40 ppm NAA maximized ber TSS content at 14.18 degrees Brix, against control at 12.82 degrees Brix.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
NAA 40 ppme2
Outcome
TSS contente2
Direction
significantly maximume2
Value
14.18 0Brixe2
Qualifier
12.82 0Brixe2
Comparator
control N0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“NAA 40 ppm induced significantly maximum of 14.18 0Brix TSS content against control N0 (12.82 0Brix).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 20 ppm GA3 dose significantly improved ber TSS content to 14.03 degrees Brix, against control at 13.13 degrees Brix.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 20 ppm dosee2
Outcome
TSS contente2
Direction
significantly improvede2
Value
14.03 0Brixe2
Qualifier
13.13 0Brixe2
Comparator
control G0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“GA3 20 ppm dose significantly improved (14.03 0Brix) TSS content over control G0 (13.13 0Brix).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interactive treatment N3 G1 maximized ber TSS content at 15.14 degrees Brix, against control at 12.82 degrees Brix.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
interactive treatment N3 G1e2
Outcome
TSS contente2
Direction
Significantly maximume2
Value
15.14 0Brixe2
Qualifier
12.82 0Brixe2
Comparator
control N0 G0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly maximum of 15.14 0Brix TSS content was revealed with interactive treatment N3 G1 against control N0 G0 (12.82 0Brix).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 20 ppm NAA significantly maximized ber ascorbic acid to 107.78 mg per 100 g pulp, against control at 86.26 mg.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
NAA 20 ppme2
Outcome
ascorbic acide2
Direction
significantly maximizede2
Value
107.78 mg/100g pulpe2
Qualifier
86.26 mge2
Comparator
control N0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment of NAA 20 ppm significantly maximized (107.78 mg/100g pulp) ascorbic acid over control N0 (86.26 mg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–1996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 40 ppm GA3 induced the maximum ber ascorbic acid content of 107.50 mg per 100 g pulp, against control at 75.71 mg.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
GA3 40 ppme2
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente2
Direction
maximume2
Value
107.50 mge2
Qualifier
75.71 mge2
Comparator
control G0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“GA3 40 ppm significantly induced the maximum 107.50 mg ascorbic acid content/ 100g pulp against control G0 (75.71 mg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interactive treatment N1 G3 recorded the maximum ber ascorbic acid of 128.56 mg, against control at 75.29 mg.

Taxon
Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.Ziziphus mauritianae1
Treatment
interactive treatment of N1 G3e2
Outcome
ascorbic acide2
Direction
maximume2
Value
128.56 mge2
Qualifier
75.29 mge2
Comparator
control N0 G0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Banarasi Karaka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum of 128.56 mg ascorbic acid was recorded under interactive treatment of N1 G3 over control N0 G0 (75.29 mg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2116–2235 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: sugar starch · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.