Paper · 2019 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effects of modified atmosphere packaging on quality parameters of minimally processed table grape during cold storage

Liguori, G.; Sortino, Giuseppe; De Pasquale, C.; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

‘Vittoria’ and ‘Red Globe’ table grapes were packed in microperforated polypropylene films (passive MAP) and non-perforated polyethylene (active MAP: 1) 20% CO2 + air; 2) 5% O2 + 15% CO2 + N) and stored at 5 °C for 28 days. Microperforated polypropylene packages had the highest postharvest performance in both cultivars until 14 days of cold storage, with reduced weight losses, rachis and berry decay. Total soluble solids content slightly increased in non-perforated polyethylene boxes as a consequence of the higher weight losses, particularly in active MAP with 5% O2 + 15% CO2 + N, while no significant differences were found for titratable acidity. Non-perforated polyethylene packages showed excessively high CO2 concentrations (30-60%) in headspace gas composition, causing berry and rachis decay. The highest postharvest performances in terms of weight losses, Total soluble solids, titratable acidity, crunchiness, juiciness and berry decay were found with micro-perforated polypropylene packages after 14 d of 5 °C cold storage, and 6 days of shelf-life (15-18°C).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microperforated polypropylene packages had the highest postharvest performance through 14 days.

Taxon
table grapese1
Material
‘Vittoria’ and ‘Red Globe’e1
Treatment
Microperforated polypropylene packagese0
Outcome
postharvest performancee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
until 14 days of cold storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Microperforated polypropylene packages had the highest postharvest performance in both cultivars until 14 days of cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–350 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Vittoria’ and ‘Red Globe’ table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microperforated polypropylene reduced weight loss and rachis and berry decay.

Taxon
table grapese1
Treatment
Microperforated polypropylene packagese0
Outcome
weight losses, rachis and berry decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
until 14 days of cold storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Microperforated polypropylene packages had the highest postharvest performance in both cultivars until 14 days of cold storage, with reduced weight losses, rachis and berry decay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–402 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Vittoria’ and ‘Red Globe’ table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble solids increased slightly in non-perforated polyethylene boxes.

Taxon
table grapese1
Treatment
non-perforated polyethylene boxese0
Outcome
Total soluble solids contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
higher weight lossese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total soluble solids content slightly increased in non-perforated polyethylene boxes as a consequence of the higher weight losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–533 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity showed no significant differences among packaging conditions.

Taxon
table grapese1
Treatment
non-perforated polyethylene boxese2
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences were found for titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
e2

“non-perforated polyethylene boxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–488 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-perforated polyethylene packages had headspace CO2 of 30-60%.

Taxon
table grapese1
Treatment
Non-perforated polyethylene packagese0
Outcome
CO2 concentrationse0
Direction
excessively highe0
Value
30-60%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Non-perforated polyethylene packages showed excessively high CO2 concentrations (30-60%) in headspace gas composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High headspace CO2 in non-perforated packages caused berry and rachis decay.

Taxon
table grapese1
Treatment
Non-perforated polyethylene packagese0
Compound
CO2e0
Outcome
berry and rachis decaye0

Verbatim

e0

“Non-perforated polyethylene packages showed excessively high CO2 concentrations (30-60%) in headspace gas composition, causing berry and rachis decay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–805 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro-perforated polypropylene gave the highest performance across listed quality traits after cold storage and shelf life.

Taxon
table grapese1
Treatment
micro-perforated polypropylene packagese0
Outcome
weight losses, Total soluble solids, titratable aciditye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
after 14 d of 5 °C cold storage, and 6 days of shelf-life (15-18°C)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest postharvest performances in terms of weight losses, Total soluble solids, titratable acidity, crunchiness, juiciness and berry decay were found with micro-perforated polypropylene packages after 14 d of 5 °C cold storage, and 6 days of shelf-life (15-18°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro-perforated polypropylene gave the highest crunchiness, juiciness and berry decay performance after cold storage and shelf life.

Taxon
table grapese1
Treatment
micro-perforated polypropylene packagese0
Outcome
crunchiness, juiciness and berry decaye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest postharvest performances in terms of weight losses, Total soluble solids, titratable acidity, crunchiness, juiciness and berry decay were found with micro-perforated polypropylene packages after 14 d of 5 °C cold storage, and 6 days of shelf-life (15-18°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–39 · show in text ↑

poly(propylene) · disease · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

storage · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.