Paper · 1984 · Journal of Agricultural Meteorology

Studies on the Control of Gaseous Environment in the Rhizosphere

Yoshiaki KITAYA; Kazutoshi YABUKI; Makoto KIYOTA

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The relationship between CO2 concentration in the rhizosphere and the growth of cucumber plant was studied. Growth rates of cucumber plant growing in the sand culture were compared for CO2 concentration varying from 0 to 5% in the rhizosphere. The effects of CO2 and O2 in the rhizosphere on photosynthetic rate were then investigated.The results obtained were as follows.(1) The growth suppression of cucumber plant occurred at 0.5-2% CO2 in the rhizosphere. Total dry weight and leaf area decreased up to 80-90% by the increase of CO2 concentration (2-5%) in the rhizosphere.(2) The growth suppression by CO2 was found five days after the beginning of treatments.(3) Water content of the top decreased with increase in CO2 concentration in the rhizosphere.(4) Photosynthetic rate decreased two hours after the beginning of treatments even at 3-5% CO2. After four hours, photosynthetic rate at 10% CO2 declined up to 85% of that before the treatment, while it retained 95% when treated with 10% O2.As described above, it is proved that the growth of cucumber plant is suppressed with increase in CO2 concentration in the rhizosphere before the suppression by decreasing O2 concentration occurs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber growth was suppressed at 0.5-2% rhizosphere CO2.

Taxon
cucumber plantCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
0.5-2% CO2e0
Outcome
growth suppressione0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth suppression of cucumber plant occurred at 0.5-2% CO2 in the rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry weight decreased by up to 80-90% as rhizosphere CO2 increased to 2-5%.

Taxon
cucumber plantCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
CO2 concentration (2-5%)e0
Outcome
Total dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
80-90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total dry weight and leaf area decreased up to 80-90% by the increase of CO2 concentration (2-5%) in the rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–577 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of cucumber plant was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area decreased by up to 80-90% as rhizosphere CO2 increased to 2-5%.

Taxon
cucumber plantCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
CO2 concentration (2-5%)e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
80-90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total dry weight and leaf area decreased up to 80-90% by the increase of CO2 concentration (2-5%) in the rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–577 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of cucumber plant was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 growth suppression appeared five days after treatment began.

Taxon
cucumber plantCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
growth suppression by CO2e0
Value
five dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth suppression by CO2 was found five days after the beginning of treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–665 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of cucumber plant was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top water content decreased as rhizosphere CO2 concentration increased.

Taxon
cucumber plantCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
Water content of the tope0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water content of the top decreased with increase in CO2 concentration in the rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–758 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of cucumber plant was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate decreased two hours after 3-5% CO2 treatment began.

Taxon
cucumber plantCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
3-5% CO2e0
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
two hourse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate decreased two hours after the beginning of treatments even at 3-5% CO2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of cucumber plant was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At four hours, photosynthesis under 10% CO2 declined to 85% of pretreatment rate.

Taxon
cucumber plantCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
10% CO2e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
declinede0
Value
85%e0
Comparator
before the treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After four hours, photosynthetic rate at 10% CO2 declined up to 85% of that before the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of cucumber plant was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing rhizosphere CO2 suppressed cucumber growth before declining O2 did.

Taxon
cucumber plantCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
growth of cucumber plante0
Direction
suppressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of cucumber plant is suppressed with increase in CO2 concentration in the rhizosphere before the suppression by decreasing O2 concentration occurs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1194 · show in text ↑

co2 · soil: physics · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.