Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Yield performance of rainfed rice under planting methods and weed control measures

Rupali Singh; Avtar Singh; Vishvajeet Singh; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Kotwa, Azamgarh during rainy season of 2008 and 2009 to evaluate the comparative efficacy of various planting methods and weed control measures on weeds density growth, yield attributes, grain yield and economics of rice variety ‘Godawari’. Four main rice establishment techniques comprised with six sub-plot weed control practices was laid out in split plot design and replicated thrice. Echinichloa colona, E. crusgalli, Cyperus rotundus, C. difformis and Commelina benghalensis were predominant weed species. Among the rice establishment techniques, puddled transplanted practices proved best for reducing weed dry matter accumulation and produced significantly highest mean grain yield (3.89 t/ha) along with yield contributing parameters in comparison to rest planting methods. Direct drum-seeded rice under puddled condition were observed to be significantly superior and recorded 2.82 t/ha more mean grain yield over direct-dry seeding. Application of pretilachlor 750 g/ha pre-emergence followed by cyhalofop-butyl 60 g/ha post-emergence at 25 DAS/DAT was found quite effective against mixed weed flora which recorded statistically similar grain yield to that of repeated hand weedings. The integration of herbicide with tools, viz. pretilachlor 750 g/ha supplemented with mechanical weeding at 25 DAS/DAT again found equally effective in increasing the grain yield as pre-and post-emergence applied herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five weed species predominated in the rice experiment.

Interactor
Echinichloa colonae0weed
Outcome
predominant weed speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Echinichloa colona, E. crusgalli, Cyperus rotundus, C. difformis and Commelina benghalensis were predominant weed species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddled transplanting reduced weed dry matter accumulation relative to other planting methods.

Treatment
puddled transplanted practicese0
Outcome
weed dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“puddled transplanted practices proved best for reducing weed dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddled transplanting produced the highest mean rice grain yield, 3.89 t/ha, among planting methods.

Treatment
puddled transplanted practicese0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.89 t/hae0
Comparator
rest planting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“puddled transplanted practices proved best for reducing weed dry matter accumulation and produced significantly highest mean grain yield (3.89 t/ha) along with yield contributing parameters in comparison to rest planting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddled transplanting produced the highest yield contributing parameters among planting methods.

Treatment
puddled transplanted practicese1
Outcome
yield contributing parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
rest planting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“produced significantly highest mean grain yield (3.89 t/ha) along with yield contributing parameters in comparison to rest planting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“puddled transplanted practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct drum seeding under puddled conditions yielded 2.82 t/ha more than direct dry seeding.

Treatment
Direct drum-seeded rice under puddled conditione0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
2.82 t/hae0
Comparator
direct-dry seedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct drum-seeded rice under puddled condition were observed to be significantly superior and recorded 2.82 t/ha more mean grain yield over direct-dry seeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pretilachlor and cyhalofop-butyl was effective against mixed weed flora.

Treatment
pretilachlor 750 g/ha pre-emergence followed by cyhalofop-butyl 60 g/ha post-emergence at 25 DAS/DATe0
Outcome
mixed weed florae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of pretilachlor 750 g/ha pre-emergence followed by cyhalofop-butyl 60 g/ha post-emergence at 25 DAS/DAT was found quite effective against mixed weed flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pretilachlor and cyhalofop-butyl gave grain yield statistically similar to repeated hand weeding.

Treatment
pretilachlor 750 g/ha pre-emergence followed by cyhalofop-butyl 60 g/ha post-emergence at 25 DAS/DATe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
repeated hand weedingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretilachlor 750 g/ha pre-emergence followed by cyhalofop-butyl 60 g/ha post-emergence at 25 DAS/DAT was found quite effective against mixed weed flora which recorded statistically similar grain yield to that of repeated hand weedings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus mechanical weeding increased grain yield as effectively as sequential herbicides.

Treatment
pretilachlor 750 g/ha supplemented with mechanical weeding at 25 DAS/DATe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
pre-and post-emergence applied herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretilachlor 750 g/ha supplemented with mechanical weeding at 25 DAS/DAT again found equally effective in increasing the grain yield as pre-and post-emergence applied herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑

Cyhalofop-butyl · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Cyhalofop-butyl · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

tillage · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

86 papers: 71 positive, 15 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

transplanting · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 129 positive, 17 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.