Paper · 2016 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Bio-hardening of in-vitro raised plants of Bhagwa pomegranate (Punica granatum)

N V SINGH; JYOTSANA SHARMA; RAM CHANDRA; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A pot culture experiment on bio-hardening of the in-vitro raised plants of Bhagwa pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) was conducted to find out the effect of two commercially available bio-formulations containing Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Aspergillus niger strain AN-27. Observations on root colonization, population dynamics of microbes in rhizospheric soil, growth, physiological and biochemical parameters of biohardened plants were recorded at 180 days after inoculation. Results revealed that AMF colonization in roots of in-vitro raised pomegranate plants was found at par in plants inoculated with AMF (71.12%) and AMF + Asp (65.00%) the root colonization in these two treatments was significantly higher than Contral (10.00%). Population of Aspergillus niger in the rhizospheric soil was found significantly higher in soil inoculated with Aspergillus niger strain AN-27 (6 × 104 cfu/g of soil) as compared to non-inoculated control (2 × 104 cfu/g of soil). Significant improvement in plant height (27.0% increase), shoot fresh weight (24.8% increase), root fresh (23.3% increase) and dry weight (15.7% increase) was observed in bio-hardened plants than untreated ones. Physiological processes were also significantly improved by bio-hardening as AMF and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly better RWC (92.34 and 91.74 %, respectively) and photosynthesis (12.69 and 12.78 µmol CO2m-2s-1, respectively) as compared to control (87.76 % and 9.07 µmol CO2m-2s-1, respectively) and only Asp treated plants (89.99% and 9.70 µmol CO2m-2s-1, respectively). AMF inoculated and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly higher total leaf chlorophyll (2.97 and 3.14 mg/g fresh weight, respectively) and total phenolic content (53.00 and 52.50 mg catechol equivalent/ 100 g fresh wt., respectively) than the control and only Asp treated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF root colonization was similar under AMF and AMF plus Aspergillus inoculation, at 71.12% and 65.00%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AMF colonization in rootse0
Direction
at pare0
Value
71.12%e0
Comparator
AMF + Aspe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF colonization in roots of in-vitro raised pomegranate plants was found at par in plants inoculated with AMF (71.12%) and AMF + Asp (65.00%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and AMF plus Aspergillus inoculation increased root colonization relative to control.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
these two treatmentse0
Outcome
root colonizatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
10.00%e0
Comparator
Contrale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root colonization in these two treatments was significantly higher than Contral (10.00%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus inoculation increased rhizosphere Aspergillus niger population to 6 × 104 cfu/g versus 2 × 104 cfu/g.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
soil inoculated with Aspergillus niger strain AN-27e0
Interactor
Aspergillus niger strain AN-27Aspergillus nigere0symbiont
Outcome
Population of Aspergillus niger in the rhizospheric soile0
Direction
highere0
Value
6 × 104 cfu/g of soile0
Qualifier
2 × 104 cfu/g of soile0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Population of Aspergillus niger in the rhizospheric soil was found significantly higher in soil inoculated with Aspergillus niger strain AN-27 (6 × 104 cfu/g of soil) as compared to non-inoculated control (2 × 104 cfu/g of soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-hardening increased plant height by 27.0% versus untreated plants.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
bio-hardened plantse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
27.0%e0
Comparator
untreated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant improvement in plant height (27.0% increase), shoot fresh weight (24.8% increase), root fresh (23.3% increase) and dry weight (15.7% increase) was observed in bio-hardened plants than untreated ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-hardening increased shoot fresh weight by 24.8% versus untreated plants.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
bio-hardened plantse0
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
24.8%e0
Comparator
untreated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant improvement in plant height (27.0% increase), shoot fresh weight (24.8% increase), root fresh (23.3% increase) and dry weight (15.7% increase) was observed in bio-hardened plants than untreated ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-hardening increased root fresh by 23.3% versus untreated plants.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
bio-hardened plantse0
Outcome
root freshe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23.3%e0
Comparator
untreated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant improvement in plant height (27.0% increase), shoot fresh weight (24.8% increase), root fresh (23.3% increase) and dry weight (15.7% increase) was observed in bio-hardened plants than untreated ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-hardening increased dry weight by 15.7% versus untreated plants.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
bio-hardened plantse0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15.7%e0
Comparator
untreated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant improvement in plant height (27.0% increase), shoot fresh weight (24.8% increase), root fresh (23.3% increase) and dry weight (15.7% increase) was observed in bio-hardened plants than untreated ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased RWC relative to control and Aspergillus alone.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
92.34e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly better RWC (92.34 and 91.74 %, respectively) and photosynthesis (12.69 and 12.78 µmol CO2m-2s-1, respectively) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF + Asp increased RWC relative to control and Aspergillus alone.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
AMF + Aspe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
91.74 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly better RWC (92.34 and 91.74 %, respectively) and photosynthesis (12.69 and 12.78 µmol CO2m-2s-1, respectively) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased photosynthesis relative to control and Aspergillus alone.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
bettere0
Value
12.69e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly better RWC (92.34 and 91.74 %, respectively) and photosynthesis (12.69 and 12.78 µmol CO2m-2s-1, respectively) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF + Asp increased photosynthesis relative to control and Aspergillus alone.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
AMF + Aspe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
bettere0
Value
12.78 µmol CO2m-2s-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly better RWC (92.34 and 91.74 %, respectively) and photosynthesis (12.69 and 12.78 µmol CO2m-2s-1, respectively) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased total leaf chlorophyll relative to control and Aspergillus alone.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
total leaf chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.97e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculated and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly higher total leaf chlorophyll (2.97 and 3.14 mg/g fresh weight, respectively) and total phenolic content (53.00 and 52.50 mg catechol equivalent/ 100 g fresh wt., respectively) than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF + Asp increased total leaf chlorophyll relative to control and Aspergillus alone.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
AMF + Aspe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
total leaf chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.14 mg/g fresh weighte0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculated and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly higher total leaf chlorophyll (2.97 and 3.14 mg/g fresh weight, respectively) and total phenolic content (53.00 and 52.50 mg catechol equivalent/ 100 g fresh wt., respectively) than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased total phenolic content relative to control and Aspergillus alone.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
53.00e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculated and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly higher total leaf chlorophyll (2.97 and 3.14 mg/g fresh weight, respectively) and total phenolic content (53.00 and 52.50 mg catechol equivalent/ 100 g fresh wt., respectively) than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF + Asp increased total phenolic content relative to control and Aspergillus alone.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
AMF + Aspe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
52.50 mg catechol equivalent/ 100 g fresh wt.e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculated and AMF + Asp treated plants registered significantly higher total leaf chlorophyll (2.97 and 3.14 mg/g fresh weight, respectively) and total phenolic content (53.00 and 52.50 mg catechol equivalent/ 100 g fresh wt., respectively) than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bhagwa pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑

inoculation · pest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: water · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.