Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Production

MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE AND DROUGHT RESISTANCE IMPROVEMENT OF POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS BY MYCORRHIZAL INOCULATION

Hoda Khalil

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted during 2014 and 2015 growing seasons in order to study the effects different drought stress levels in particular; 100%, 50% and 25% of the soil field capacity (FC) as well as the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) inoculation on morphological and physiological performance and drought resistance of pomegranate seedlings. Drought stress decreased arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization. In both the AM and non AM, growth rate, leaf area, trunk cross sectional area and total dry weight decreased with increasing drought stress levels. AM colonization significantly stimulated plant growth indices and biomass production regardless of water status. Increasing drought stress levels tended to increase the proline accumulation, while the chlorophyll content, leaf total carbohydrates, and catalase activity (CAT) decreased. By contrast, AM colonization increased chlorophyll content, proline, total carbohydrates and CAT activity. A gradual decrease in leaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content was evident with increasing drought stress levels. However, the seedlings inoculated with AM fungus had significantly higher leaf water potential (- 1.5MPa) compared to the non-inoculated seedlings (- 2.0MPa).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced AM colonization.

Taxon
POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGSPunica granatumt0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)e0symbiont
Outcome
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonizatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress decreased arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–432 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and biomass declined as drought increased.

Taxon
POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGSPunica granatumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
growth rate, leaf area, trunk cross sectional area and total dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“growth rate, leaf area, trunk cross sectional area and total dry weight decreased with increasing drought stress levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM colonization stimulated growth and biomass.

Taxon
POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGSPunica granatumt0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth indices and biomass productione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
regardless of water statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“AM colonization significantly stimulated plant growth indices and biomass production regardless of water status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–693 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased with drought.

Taxon
POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGSPunica granatumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
proline accumulatione0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing drought stress levels tended to increase the proline accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–770 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll, carbohydrates and catalase activity decreased with drought.

Taxon
POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGSPunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, leaf total carbohydrates, and catalase activity (CAT)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“chlorophyll content, leaf total carbohydrates, and catalase activity (CAT) decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–866 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM colonization increased chlorophyll, proline and carbohydrates.

Taxon
POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGSPunica granatumt0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll content, proline, total carbohydrates and CAT activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“AM colonization increased chlorophyll content, proline, total carbohydrates and CAT activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–974 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water potential and relative water content fell with drought.

Taxon
POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGSPunica granatumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“A gradual decrease in leaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content was evident with increasing drought stress levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-inoculated seedlings had higher leaf water potential.

Taxon
POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGSPunica granatumt0
Treatment
inoculated with AM funguse0
Interactor
AM funguse0symbiont
Outcome
leaf water potentiale0
Direction
highere0
Value
- 1.5MPae0
Qualifier
- 2.0MPae0
Comparator
non-inoculated seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“seedlings inoculated with AM fungus had significantly higher leaf water potential (- 1.5MPa) compared to the non-inoculated seedlings (- 2.0MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1257 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: water · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: water · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.