Paper · 2013

Utilization Efficiency of Zinc by Some Wheat Cultivars Under Stress Condition of Zinc Deficiency

A. I. Rezk; Abou El-Nour .

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was carried out in the greenhouse of Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University to evaluate the response of three wheat cultivars (Sakha-93, Gemiza-7 and Giza-168) grown in sandy calcareous soil to soil application of Zn as ZnSO or as Zn-EDTA. In addition, a field experiment was carried out to evaluate 4 the response of the three wheat cultivars to foliar application of Zn as either ZnSO or Zn-EDTA. The results 4 showed significant increases in dry weight of shoot, Zn concentration and Zn uptake with addition of Zn to Zn deficient soil. Sakha-93 cultivar showed the highest response to Zn soil application as either ZnSO or 4 Zn-EDTA compared to the other two cultivars with respect to the shoot dry weight. The relative increase in shoot dry weight in addition to Zn concentration and uptake in shoots was almost higher from Zn-EDTA than from ZnSO with the three cultivars. This is also indicated by the highest values of Zn use efficiency (ZnUE) 4 by shoots, which were higher from Zn-EDTA than ZnSO . Foliar application of Zn as Zn-EDTA or ZnSO 44 increased significantly the straw and grain yields of the three wheat cultivars. However, Sakha-93 showed the highest yields, while Giza-168 showed the lowest yields. The responses of the straw and grains yields and Zn concentration in grains and flag leaf of Sakha-93 to foliar application by Zn-EDTA were greater than ZnSO and 4 higher than those of Gemiza-7 and Giza-168 cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha-93 showed the highest shoot dry weight response to Zn soil application compared with the other two wheat cultivars.

Material
Sakha-93e2
Treatment
Zn soil applicatione2
Outcome
shoot dry weighte3
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
the other two cultivarse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sakha-93 cultivar showed the highest response to Zn soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–631 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the other two cultivars with respect to the shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative increase in shoot dry weight was almost higher with Zn-EDTA than with ZnSO in wheat.

Treatment
Zn-EDTAe4
Outcome
relative increase in shoot dry weighte4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
ZnSOe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The relative increase in shoot dry weight in addition to Zn concentration and uptake in shoots was almost higher from Zn-EDTA than from ZnSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn use efficiency by shoots was higher with Zn-EDTA than with ZnSO in wheat.

Organ / stage
shootse5
Treatment
Zn-EDTAe5
Outcome
values of Zn use efficiency (ZnUE)e5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
ZnSOe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“This is also indicated by the highest values of Zn use efficiency (ZnUE) 4 by shoots, which were higher from Zn-EDTA than ZnSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of Zn significantly increased straw and grain yields of the three wheat cultivars.

Treatment
Foliar application of Zne6
Outcome
straw and grain yieldse7
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Foliar application of Zn as Zn-EDTA or ZnSO 44 increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1100 · show in text ↑
e7

“the straw and grain yields of the three wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha-93 had the highest yields among the three wheat cultivars under foliar Zn.

Material
Sakha-93e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha-93 showed the highest yields, while Giza-168 showed the lowest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza-168 had the lowest yields among the three wheat cultivars under foliar Zn.

Material
Giza-168e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha-93 showed the highest yields, while Giza-168 showed the lowest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn-EDTA responses of straw and grain yields and grain and flag leaf Zn concentration in Sakha-93 were greater than with ZnSO.

Material
Sakha-93e1
Treatment
foliar application by Zn-EDTAe1
Outcome
responses of the straw and grains yields and Zn concentration in grains and flag leafe1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
ZnSOe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The responses of the straw and grains yields and Zn concentration in grains and flag leaf of Sakha-93 to foliar application by Zn-EDTA were greater than ZnSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn-EDTA responses in Sakha-93 were higher than those of Gemiza-7 and Giza-168 cultivars.

Material
Sakha-93e1
Treatment
foliar application by Zn-EDTAe1
Outcome
responses of the straw and grains yields and Zn concentration in grains and flag leafe1
Direction
highere2
Comparator
Gemiza-7 and Giza-168 cultivarse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The responses of the straw and grains yields and Zn concentration in grains and flag leaf of Sakha-93 to foliar application by Zn-EDTA were greater than ZnSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1401 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher than those of Gemiza-7 and Giza-168 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–54 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.