Paper · 2021 · Plants

Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status—Variety-Specific Mechanisms of Zinc Tolerance during Biofortification

Ivna Štolfa Čamagajevac; Rosemary Vuković; Kristina Vuković; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the leaf antioxidative responses of three wheat varieties (Srpanjka, Divana, and Simonida) treated with two different forms of zinc (Zn), Zn-sulfate and Zn-EDTA, in concentrations commonly used in agronomic biofortification. Zn concentration was significantly higher in the flag leaves of all three wheat varieties treated with Zn-EDTA compared to control and leaves treated with Zn-sulfate. Both forms of Zn increased malondialdehyde level and total phenolics content in varieties Srpanjka and Divana. Total glutathione content was not affected after the Zn treatment. Zn-sulfate increased the activities of glutathione reductase (GR) and guaiacol peroxidase (GPOD) in both Srpanjka and Divana, while glutathione S-transferase (GST) was only induced in var. Srpanjka. Chelate form of Zn increased the activities of GST and GPOD in both Simonida and Divana. Catalase activity was shown to be less sensitive to Zn treatment and was only induced in var. Srpanjka treated with Zn-EDTA where GPOD activity was not induced. Concentrations of Zn used for agronomic biofortification can induce oxidative stress in wheat leaves. The antioxidative status of wheat leaves could be a good indicator of Zn tolerance, whereas wheat genotype and chemical form of Zn are the most critical factors influencing Zn toxicity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-EDTA significantly increased Zn concentration in the flag leaves of all three wheat varieties compared with control and Zn-sulfate.

Material
Srpanjka, Divana, and Simonidae0
Organ / stage
flag leavese1
Treatment
Zn-EDTAe1
Outcome
Zn concentratione1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
control and leaves treated with Zn-sulfatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“three wheat varieties (Srpanjka, Divana, and Simonida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zn concentration was significantly higher in the flag leaves of all three wheat varieties treated with Zn-EDTA compared to control and leaves treated with Zn-sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both forms of Zn increased malondialdehyde level in Srpanjka and Divana.

Material
Srpanjka and Divanae2
Treatment
Both forms of Zne2
Outcome
malondialdehyde levele2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both forms of Zn increased malondialdehyde level and total phenolics content in varieties Srpanjka and Divana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both forms of Zn increased total phenolics content in Srpanjka and Divana.

Material
Srpanjka and Divanae2
Treatment
Both forms of Zne2
Outcome
total phenolics contente2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both forms of Zn increased malondialdehyde level and total phenolics content in varieties Srpanjka and Divana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total glutathione content was not affected by the Zn treatment.

Treatment
Zn treatmente3
Outcome
Total glutathione contente3
Direction
not affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e3

“Total glutathione content was not affected after the Zn treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-sulfate increased glutathione reductase and guaiacol peroxidase activities in Srpanjka and Divana.

Material
Srpanjka and Divanae4
Treatment
Zn-sulfatee4
Gene
glutathione reductase (GR) and guaiacol peroxidase (GPOD)e4
Outcome
activitiese4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e4

“Zn-sulfate increased the activities of glutathione reductase (GR) and guaiacol peroxidase (GPOD) in both Srpanjka and Divana, while glutathione S-transferase (GST) was only induced in var. Srpanjka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-sulfate induced glutathione S-transferase activity only in Srpanjka.

Material
var. Srpanjkae4
Treatment
Zn-sulfatee4
Gene
glutathione S-transferase (GST)e4
Outcome
activitiese4
Direction
inducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e4

“Zn-sulfate increased the activities of glutathione reductase (GR) and guaiacol peroxidase (GPOD) in both Srpanjka and Divana, while glutathione S-transferase (GST) was only induced in var. Srpanjka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelated Zn increased glutathione S-transferase and guaiacol peroxidase activities in Simonida and Divana.

Material
Simonida and Divanae5
Treatment
Chelate form of Zne5
Gene
GST and GPODe5
Outcome
activitiese5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e5

“Chelate form of Zn increased the activities of GST and GPOD in both Simonida and Divana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity was less sensitive to Zn treatment than the other enzymes measured.

Treatment
Zn treatmente6
Gene
Catalasee6
Outcome
activitye6
Direction
less sensitivee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e6

“Catalase activity was shown to be less sensitive to Zn treatment and was only induced in var. Srpanjka treated with Zn-EDTA where GPOD activity was not induced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-EDTA induced catalase activity only in Srpanjka.

Material
var. Srpanjkae6
Treatment
Zn-EDTAe6
Gene
Catalasee6
Outcome
activitye6
Direction
inducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e6

“Catalase activity was shown to be less sensitive to Zn treatment and was only induced in var. Srpanjka treated with Zn-EDTA where GPOD activity was not induced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-EDTA did not induce guaiacol peroxidase activity.

Treatment
Zn-EDTAe6
Gene
GPODe6
Outcome
activitye6
Direction
not inducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Leaf Antioxidative Status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e6

“Catalase activity was shown to be less sensitive to Zn treatment and was only induced in var. Srpanjka treated with Zn-EDTA where GPOD activity was not induced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrations of Zn used for agronomic biofortification can induce oxidative stress in wheat leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese6
Treatment
Concentrations of Zn used for agronomic biofortificatione6
Outcome
oxidative stresse6
Direction
inducee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Concentrations of Zn used for agronomic biofortification can induce oxidative stress in wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1147 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antioxidative status of wheat leaves may indicate Zn tolerance.

Organ / stage
leavese7
Outcome
Zn tolerancee7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The antioxidative status of wheat leaves could be a good indicator of Zn tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1231 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat genotype and chemical form of Zn are the most critical factors influencing Zn toxicity.

Material
wheat genotypee7
Treatment
chemical form of Zne7
Outcome
Zn toxicitye7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“wheat genotype and chemical form of Zn are the most critical factors influencing Zn toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1333 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

27 papers: 19 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.