Paper · 2021 · BMC Plant Biology

Role of exogenous-applied salicylic acid, zinc and glycine betaine to improve drought-tolerance in wheat during reproductive growth stages

Ramadan Shemi; Rui Wang; El-Sayed M. S. Gheith; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
67
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Drought has become a dangerous threat to reduce crop productivity throughout the world. Exogenous applications of regulators, micronutrients, and/or osmoprotectants for inducing drought-tolerance in field crops have been effectively adopted. A controlled pot study was performed to investigate the relative efficacy of salicylic acid (SA), zinc (Zn), and glycine betaine (GB) as foliar applications on the growth, tissues pigments content, relative water content (RWC), leaf gas-exchange, antioxidant enzymes activity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, osmolytes contents, and the yield parameters of wheat plants subjected to two soil water conditions (85% field capacity: well-watered, 50% field capacity: water-deficient) during reproductive growth stages. Results Water deficient conditions significantly decreased the growth, yield parameters, RWC, photosynthesis pigment, and gas-exchange attributes except for intercellular CO 2 concentration. However, foliar applications remarkably improved the growth and yield parameters under water deficit conditions. Under drought condition, exogenous applications of SA, Zn, and GB increased the grain yield pot − 1 by 27.99, 15.23 and 37.36%, respectively, as compared to the control treatment. Drought stress statistically increased the contents of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), superoxide anion radical (O 2 •− ), and malonaldehyde (MDA), and elevated the harmful oxidation to cell lipids in plants, however, they were considerably reduced by foliar applications. Foliar applications of SA, Zn, and GB decreased MDA content by 29.09, 16.64 and 26.51% under drought stress, respectively, as compared to the control treatment. Activities of all antioxidant enzymes, proline content, and soluble sugar were increased in response to foliar applications under water deficit conditions. Conclusions Overall, foliar application of GB, SA, and Zn compounds improved the drought-tolerance in wheat by decreasing the ROS accumulation, promoting enzymatic antioxidants, and increasing osmolytes accumulation. Finally, GB treatment was most effective in thoroughly assessed parameters of wheat followed by SA and Zn applications to alleviate the adverse effects of drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly decreased growth, yield, relative water content, pigments and gas exchange except intercellular CO2.

Treatment
Water deficient conditionse0
Outcome
growth, yield parameters, RWC, photosynthesis pigment, and gas-exchange attributese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
except for intercellular CO 2 concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water deficient conditions significantly decreased the growth, yield parameters, RWC, photosynthesis pigment, and gas-exchange attributes except for intercellular CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar applications improved growth and yield under water deficit.

Treatment
foliar applicationse0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under water deficit conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar applications remarkably improved the growth and yield parameters under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA increased grain yield per pot by 27.99%.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
grain yield pot − 1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.99e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“applications of SA, Zn, and GB increased the grain yield pot − 1 by 27.99, 15.23 and 37.36%, respectively, as compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn increased grain yield per pot by 15.23%.

Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
grain yield pot − 1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.23e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“applications of SA, Zn, and GB increased the grain yield pot − 1 by 27.99, 15.23 and 37.36%, respectively, as compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GB increased grain yield per pot by 37.36%.

Treatment
GBe0
Outcome
grain yield pot − 1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.36%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“applications of SA, Zn, and GB increased the grain yield pot − 1 by 27.99, 15.23 and 37.36%, respectively, as compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased hydrogen peroxide, superoxide and MDA contents and lipid oxidation.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
contents of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), superoxide anion radical (O 2 •− ), and malonaldehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress statistically increased the contents of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), superoxide anion radical (O 2 •− ), and malonaldehyde (MDA), and elevated the harmful oxidation to cell lipids in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar applications reduced the drought-induced oxidative measures.

Treatment
foliar applicationse0
Outcome
theye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“they were considerably reduced by foliar applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA decreased MDA by 29.09% under drought.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
29.09e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar applications of SA, Zn, and GB decreased MDA content by 29.09, 16.64 and 26.51% under drought stress, respectively, as compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn decreased MDA by 16.64% under drought.

Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16.64e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar applications of SA, Zn, and GB decreased MDA content by 29.09, 16.64 and 26.51% under drought stress, respectively, as compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GB decreased MDA by 26.51% under drought.

Treatment
GBe0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
26.51%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar applications of SA, Zn, and GB decreased MDA content by 29.09, 16.64 and 26.51% under drought stress, respectively, as compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatments increased antioxidant enzyme activities, proline and soluble sugar under water deficit.

Treatment
foliar applicationse0
Outcome
Activities of all antioxidant enzymes, proline content, and soluble sugare0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Activities of all antioxidant enzymes, proline content, and soluble sugar were increased in response to foliar applications under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1860 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GB was most effective overall, followed by SA and Zn.

Treatment
GB treatmente0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
SA and Zn applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“GB treatment was most effective in thoroughly assessed parameters of wheat followed by SA and Zn applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2088–2197 · show in text ↑

glycine betaine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

27 papers: 19 positive, 8 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

62 papers: 56 positive, 6 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 81 positive, 4 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

glycine betaine · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 18 positive, 110 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.