Paper · 2018 · The Journal Agriculture and Forestry

SEED PRIMING WITH SALICYLIC ACID ENHANCED GAS EXCHANGES PARAMETERS AND BIOLOGICAL YIELD OF WHEAT UNDER LATE SOWING DATE

Mehdi ABDOLAHI; Farid SHEKARI; Jalal SABA; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This experiment was done to evaluate the effect of two planting dates and salicylic acid (SA) on wheat photosynthesis. Wheat seeds, cv. Alvand, primed with SA (0, 400, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000 and 2400 M) at two planting dates (recommended planting date, 23 October, and late planting date, 22 November). Gas exchange parameters were measured in three growth stages (tillering, heading and grain filling). The highest and lowest rate of photosynthesis (P N ), stomatal conductance (g s ) and transpiration rate (E) of plants were observed in heading and grain filling stages, respectively. Seed pretreatment with SA enhanced photosynthetic parameters and carboxylation efficiency (CE), but, intercellular CO 2 concentration and water use efficiency (WUE) reduced by application of SA. It seems that application of SA had more effects on g s and E than P N . Among growth stages, the highest value of WUE was found in tillering and lowest in heading stage. Priming with SA compensated late sowing effects on plants P N . Chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a/b ratio and CCI values significantly increased in SA treated plants. Results show that priming with SA may reduce ameliorative effects of late sowing on wheat plant biomass production. Among SA concentrations, 1200 M had highest value in both planting dates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration were highest at heading and lowest at grain filling.

Organ / stage
heading and grain filling stagese0
Outcome
rate of photosynthesis (P N ), stomatal conductance (g s ) and transpiration rate (E)e0
Direction
highest and loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and lowest rate of photosynthesis (P N ), stomatal conductance (g s ) and transpiration rate (E) of plants were observed in heading and grain filling stages, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA pretreatment enhanced photosynthetic parameters and carboxylation efficiency.

Treatment
Seed pretreatment with SAe0
Outcome
photosynthetic parameters and carboxylation efficiency (CE)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed pretreatment with SA enhanced photosynthetic parameters and carboxylation efficiency (CE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA reduced intercellular CO 2 concentration and water use efficiency.

Treatment
application of SAe0
Outcome
intercellular CO 2 concentration and water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercellular CO 2 concentration and water use efficiency (WUE) reduced by application of SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA affected stomatal conductance and transpiration more than photosynthesis.

Treatment
application of SAe0
Outcome
more effects on g s and E than P Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of SA had more effects on g s and E than P N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was highest at tillering and lowest at heading.

Organ / stage
tillering and lowest in heading stagee0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest value of WUE was found in tillering and lowest in heading stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA priming compensated late sowing effects on photosynthesis.

Treatment
Priming with SAe0
Outcome
plants P Ne0
Direction
compensatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Priming with SA compensated late sowing effects on plants P N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA treatment significantly increased chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a/b ratio and CCI.

Treatment
SA treatede0
Outcome
Chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a/b ratio and CCI valuese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a/b ratio and CCI values significantly increased in SA treated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest SA priming may reduce the ameliorative effect of late sowing on biomass.

Treatment
priming with SAe0
Outcome
wheat plant biomass productione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming with SA may reduce ameliorative effects of late sowing on wheat plant biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1200 M SA concentration had the highest value at both planting dates.

Treatment
1200 Me0
Outcome
highest valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both planting datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among SA concentrations, 1200 M had highest value in both planting dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 29 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 81 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 270 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.