Paper · 2025 · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Changes of photosynthetic characteristics, stomatal microstructure and proline metabolism in wheat seedlings under different combined treatments of zinc, iron and copper

Zhe Zhang; Rongrong Ma; Yihui Tao; et al.

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Heavy metals including iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) pollution in soil is threatening the ecological environment and crop yield. In this experiment, photosynthetic characteristics, stomatal microstructure and proline (Pro) metabolism in wheat variety 'Xihan 3' seedlings were assessed to explore the mechanism of phytotoxicity induced by various combinations of zinc (Zn), Fe and Cu. Compared with the control, Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatments obviously lowered the shoot and root lengths, reduced leaf area and root number, along with the increases of malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion radicals levels and relative conductivity in wheat leaves. The net photosynthetic rate also lessened with the decreases of chlorophyll (Chl) level, Chl fluorescence parameters, stomatal conductance and stomatal length and width under these combined treatments. Additionally, different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cu increased the amount of osmotic regulators including Pro in wheat roots, up-regulated Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid synthetase (P5CS), glutamate kinase, Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (P5CR) and ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) activities and TaP5CS, TaP5CR and TaOAT expression, but down-regulated Pro dehydrogenase (ProDH) activity and TaProDH expression. Taken together, different combined treatments of Zn, Fe and Cu severely restricted root and leaf development through enhancing oxidative damage and weakening photosynthetic efficiency in wheat leaves, and the combined treatment-caused Pro accumulation in wheat roots could achieved through both glutamate and ornithine synthesis pathway and attenuated Pro degradation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined metal treatments reduced wheat shoot and root length, leaf area and root number.

Material
Xihan 3e1
Treatment
Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatmentse0
Outcome
shoot and root lengths, reduced leaf area and root numbere0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control, Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatments obviously lowered the shoot and root lengths, reduced leaf area and root number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, photosynthetic characteristics, stomatal microstructure and proline (Pro) metabolism in wheat variety 'Xihan 3' seedlings were assessed to explore the mechanism of phytotoxicity induced by various combinations of zinc (Zn), Fe and Cu. Compared with the control, Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatments obviously lowered the shoot and root lengths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–505 · show in text ↑
e2

“different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cu increased the amount of osmotic regulators including Pro in wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined metal treatments increased oxidative damage markers and relative conductivity in leaves.

Treatment
Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatmentse1
Outcome
malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion radicals levels and relative conductivitye0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“along with the increases of malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion radicals levels and relative conductivity in wheat leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, photosynthetic characteristics, stomatal microstructure and proline (Pro) metabolism in wheat variety 'Xihan 3' seedlings were assessed to explore the mechanism of phytotoxicity induced by various combinations of zinc (Zn), Fe and Cu. Compared with the control, Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatments obviously lowered the shoot and root lengths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–505 · show in text ↑
e2

“different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cu increased the amount of osmotic regulators including Pro in wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined metals reduced net photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll, fluorescence, stomatal conductance and stomatal dimensions.

Treatment
these combined treatmentse0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
lessenede0
Qualifier
decreases of chlorophyll (Chl) level, Chl fluorescence parameters, stomatal conductance and stomatal length and widthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net photosynthetic rate also lessened with the decreases of chlorophyll (Chl) level, Chl fluorescence parameters, stomatal conductance and stomatal length and width under these combined treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, photosynthetic characteristics, stomatal microstructure and proline (Pro) metabolism in wheat variety 'Xihan 3' seedlings were assessed to explore the mechanism of phytotoxicity induced by various combinations of zinc (Zn), Fe and Cu. Compared with the control, Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatments obviously lowered the shoot and root lengths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–505 · show in text ↑
e2

“different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cu increased the amount of osmotic regulators including Pro in wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined metals increased proline and other osmotic regulators in wheat roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cue0
Outcome
amount of osmotic regulators including Proe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cu increased the amount of osmotic regulators including Pro in wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined metals upregulated P5CS, glutamate kinase, P5CR and OAT activities.

Treatment
different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cue2
Outcome
Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid synthetase (P5CS), glutamate kinase, Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (P5CR) and ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) activitiese0
Direction
up-regulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“up-regulated Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid synthetase (P5CS), glutamate kinase, Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (P5CR) and ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, photosynthetic characteristics, stomatal microstructure and proline (Pro) metabolism in wheat variety 'Xihan 3' seedlings were assessed to explore the mechanism of phytotoxicity induced by various combinations of zinc (Zn), Fe and Cu. Compared with the control, Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatments obviously lowered the shoot and root lengths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–505 · show in text ↑
e2

“different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cu increased the amount of osmotic regulators including Pro in wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined metals upregulated TaP5CS, TaP5CR and TaOAT expression.

Treatment
different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cue2
Outcome
TaP5CS, TaP5CR and TaOAT expressione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TaP5CS, TaP5CR and TaOAT expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, photosynthetic characteristics, stomatal microstructure and proline (Pro) metabolism in wheat variety 'Xihan 3' seedlings were assessed to explore the mechanism of phytotoxicity induced by various combinations of zinc (Zn), Fe and Cu. Compared with the control, Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatments obviously lowered the shoot and root lengths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–505 · show in text ↑
e2

“different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cu increased the amount of osmotic regulators including Pro in wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined metals downregulated ProDH activity and TaProDH expression.

Treatment
different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cue2
Outcome
Pro dehydrogenase (ProDH) activity and TaProDH expressione0
Direction
down-regulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“down-regulated Pro dehydrogenase (ProDH) activity and TaProDH expression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, photosynthetic characteristics, stomatal microstructure and proline (Pro) metabolism in wheat variety 'Xihan 3' seedlings were assessed to explore the mechanism of phytotoxicity induced by various combinations of zinc (Zn), Fe and Cu. Compared with the control, Zn + Fe, Zn + Cu, Fe + Cu and Zn + Fe + Cu treatments obviously lowered the shoot and root lengths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–505 · show in text ↑
e2

“different combinations of Zn, Fe and Cu increased the amount of osmotic regulators including Pro in wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1012 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute restricted root and leaf development to oxidative damage and weakened photosynthesis.

Treatment
different combined treatments of Zn, Fe and Cue0
Outcome
root and leaf developmente0
Qualifier
enhancing oxidative damage and weakening photosynthetic efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different combined treatments of Zn, Fe and Cu severely restricted root and leaf development through enhancing oxidative damage and weakening photosynthetic efficiency in wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1505 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute root proline accumulation to glutamate and ornithine synthesis and reduced degradation.

Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
Pro accumulation in wheat rootse0
Qualifier
both glutamate and ornithine synthesis pathway and attenuated Pro degradatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined treatment-caused Pro accumulation in wheat roots could achieved through both glutamate and ornithine synthesis pathway and attenuated Pro degradation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1674 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

27 papers: 19 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

iron atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

54 papers: 41 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

copper atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

61 papers: 31 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

copper atom · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

iron atom · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

copper atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.