Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Iron-modified biochar improves plant physiology, soil nutritional status and mitigates Pb and Cd-hazard in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Jari S. Algethami; Muhammad Kashif Irshad; Wasim Javed; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
54
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Environmental quality and food safety is threatened by contamination of lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) heavy metals in agricultural soils. Therefore, it is necessary to develop effective techniques for remediation of such soils. In this study, we prepared iron-modified biochar (Fe-BC) which combines the unique characteristics of pristine biochar (BC) and iron. The current study investigated the effect of pristine and iron modified biochar (Fe-BC) on the nutritional values of soil and on the reduction of Pb and Cd toxicity in wheat plants ( Triticum aestivum L.). The findings of present study exhibited that 2% Fe-BC treatments significantly increased the dry weights of roots, shoots, husk and grains by 148.2, 53.2, 64.2 and 148%, respectively compared to control plants. The 2% Fe-BC treatment also enhanced photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 , chlorophyll a and b contents, by 43.2, 88.4, 24.9, 32.5, 21.4, and 26.7%, respectively. Moreover, 2% Fe-BC treatment suppressed the oxidative stress in wheat plants by increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) by 62.4 and 69.2%, respectively. The results showed that 2% Fe-BC treatment significantly lowered Cd levels in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains by 23.7, 44.5, 33.2, and 76.3%. Whereas, Pb concentrations in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains decreased by 46.4, 49.4, 53.6, and 68.3%, respectively. Post-harvest soil analysis showed that soil treatment with 2% Fe-BC increased soil urease, CAT and acid phosphatase enzyme activities by 48.4, 74.4 and 117.3%, respectively. Similarly, 2% Fe-BC treatment significantly improved nutrients availability in the soil as the available N, P, K, and Fe contents increased by 22, 25, 7.3, and 13.3%, respectively. Fe-BC is a viable solution for the remediation of hazardous Cd and Pb contaminated soils, and improvement of soil fertility status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC increased dry weights of roots by 148.2.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmentse0
Outcome
dry weights of rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
148.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatments significantly increased the dry weights of roots, shoots, husk and grains by 148.2, 53.2, 64.2 and 148%, respectively compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC increased shoots by 53.2.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmentse0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatments significantly increased the dry weights of roots, shoots, husk and grains by 148.2, 53.2, 64.2 and 148%, respectively compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC increased husk by 64.2.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmentse0
Outcome
huske0
Direction
increasede0
Value
64.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatments significantly increased the dry weights of roots, shoots, husk and grains by 148.2, 53.2, 64.2 and 148%, respectively compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC increased grains by 148%.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmentse0
Outcome
grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
148%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatments significantly increased the dry weights of roots, shoots, husk and grains by 148.2, 53.2, 64.2 and 148%, respectively compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC enhanced photosynthesis rate by 43.2.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
43.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment also enhanced photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 , chlorophyll a and b contents, by 43.2, 88.4, 24.9, 32.5, 21.4, and 26.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC enhanced transpiration rate by 88.4.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
88.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment also enhanced photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 , chlorophyll a and b contents, by 43.2, 88.4, 24.9, 32.5, 21.4, and 26.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC enhanced stomatal conductance by 24.9.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
24.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment also enhanced photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 , chlorophyll a and b contents, by 43.2, 88.4, 24.9, 32.5, 21.4, and 26.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC enhanced intercellular CO 2 by 32.5.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
intercellular CO 2e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
32.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment also enhanced photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 , chlorophyll a and b contents, by 43.2, 88.4, 24.9, 32.5, 21.4, and 26.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC enhanced chlorophyll a by 21.4.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
21.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment also enhanced photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 , chlorophyll a and b contents, by 43.2, 88.4, 24.9, 32.5, 21.4, and 26.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC enhanced b contents by 26.7%.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
b contentse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
26.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment also enhanced photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO 2 , chlorophyll a and b contents, by 43.2, 88.4, 24.9, 32.5, 21.4, and 26.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 62.4.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
62.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment suppressed the oxidative stress in wheat plants by increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) by 62.4 and 69.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC increasing catalase (CAT) by 69.2%.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
69.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment suppressed the oxidative stress in wheat plants by increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) by 62.4 and 69.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC lowered Cd levels in wheat roots by 23.7.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
Cd levels in wheat rootse0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
23.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment significantly lowered Cd levels in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains by 23.7, 44.5, 33.2, and 76.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC lowered shoots by 44.5.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
44.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment significantly lowered Cd levels in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains by 23.7, 44.5, 33.2, and 76.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC lowered husk by 33.2.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
huske0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
33.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment significantly lowered Cd levels in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains by 23.7, 44.5, 33.2, and 76.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC lowered grains by 76.3%.

Treatment
2% Fe-BC treatmente0
Outcome
grainse0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
76.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% Fe-BC treatment significantly lowered Cd levels in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains by 23.7, 44.5, 33.2, and 76.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC decreased Pb concentrations in wheat roots by 46.4.

Outcome
Pb concentrations in wheat rootse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
46.4e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pb concentrations in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains decreased by 46.4, 49.4, 53.6, and 68.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC decreased shoots by 49.4.

Outcome
shootse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
49.4e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pb concentrations in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains decreased by 46.4, 49.4, 53.6, and 68.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC decreased husk by 53.6.

Outcome
huske0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
53.6e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pb concentrations in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains decreased by 46.4, 49.4, 53.6, and 68.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% Fe-BC decreased grains by 68.3%.

Outcome
grainse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
68.3%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pb concentrations in wheat roots, shoots, husk, and grains decreased by 46.4, 49.4, 53.6, and 68.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1425 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

iron atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

54 papers: 41 positive, 13 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

iron atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

iron atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.