Paper · 2006 · Seed Science and Technology

Effect of temperatures during seed development and pretreatment on seed dormancy of Malus sargentii and M. sieboldii

K.A. Thomsen; E.N. Eriksen

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

25 Topic: Research Notes Key Author: Kirsten A. Thomsen Correspondence Address: The State Forest Tree Improvement Station Krogerupvej 21 3050 Humlebaek Denmark E-mail: kth@sns.dk Authors: K.A. Thomsen and E.N. Eriksen Effect of temperatures during seed development and pretreatment on seed dormancy of Malus sargentii and M. sieboldii Pages: 215-220 Eight pretreatment temperatures ranging from 0.5°C to 18.5°C were tested on two Malus sargentii seed lots. Temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy, 0.5°C and 4.0°C were equally efficient in releasing the dormancy, but only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment. To investigate the effect of temperature during seed development on the level of dormancy, two clones of M. sargentii and seed plants of Malus sieboldii were transferred after pollination to growth chambers at three different temperature regimes (normal mean temperature ± 3°C). Ripe fruits were harvested at three different dates. M. sieboldii plants and a third clone of M. sargentii were kept outside for comparison. Seed weights and moisture contents after harvest were determined, and germination was tested after pretreatment at 4°C for different periods. M. sargentii seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights, lower seed moisture contents and were less dormant than seeds developed at the lowest temperature regime. The difference in pretreatment needed to obtain maximum germination was 4-5 weeks. Twelve weeks pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds, but at least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break the seed dormancy of M. sargentii.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy

Taxon
Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Treatment
Temperatures above 9°Ce1
Outcome
seed dormancye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sargentii
Malus sargentii · TaxonChrumps · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight pretreatment temperatures ranging from 0.5°C to 18.5°C were tested on two Malus sargentii seed lots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–455 · show in text ↑
e1

“Temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy, 0.5°C and 4.0°C were equally efficient in releasing the dormancy, but only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–653 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment at 0.5°C and 4.0°C was equally efficient in releasing seed dormancy

Taxon
Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Treatment
0.5°C and 4.0°Ce1
Outcome
releasing the dormancye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sargentii
Malus sargentii · TaxonChrumps · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight pretreatment temperatures ranging from 0.5°C to 18.5°C were tested on two Malus sargentii seed lots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–455 · show in text ↑
e1

“Temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy, 0.5°C and 4.0°C were equally efficient in releasing the dormancy, but only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–653 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment

Taxon
Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Treatment
pretreated at 4°Ce1
Outcome
germinated during pretreatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sargentii
Malus sargentii · TaxonChrumps · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight pretreatment temperatures ranging from 0.5°C to 18.5°C were tested on two Malus sargentii seed lots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–455 · show in text ↑
e1

“Temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy, 0.5°C and 4.0°C were equally efficient in releasing the dormancy, but only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights than at the lowest regime

Taxon
M. sargentiiMalus sargentiie2
Treatment
highest temperature regimee2
Outcome
seed weightse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
lowest temperature regimee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sargentii
Malus sargentii · TaxonChrumps · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“M. sargentii seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights, lower seed moisture contents and were less dormant than seeds developed at the lowest temperature regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had lower seed moisture contents than at the lowest regime

Taxon
M. sargentiiMalus sargentiie2
Treatment
highest temperature regimee2
Outcome
seed moisture contentse2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
lowest temperature regimee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sargentii
Malus sargentii · TaxonChrumps · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“M. sargentii seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights, lower seed moisture contents and were less dormant than seeds developed at the lowest temperature regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime were less dormant than at the lowest regime

Taxon
M. sargentiiMalus sargentiie2
Treatment
highest temperature regimee2
Outcome
seed dormancye1
Direction
less dormante2
Comparator
lowest temperature regimee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sargentii
Malus sargentii · TaxonChrumps · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy, 0.5°C and 4.0°C were equally efficient in releasing the dormancy, but only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–653 · show in text ↑
e2

“M. sargentii seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights, lower seed moisture contents and were less dormant than seeds developed at the lowest temperature regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1409 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The difference in pretreatment needed for maximum germination was 4-5 weeks

Taxon
Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Outcome
maximum germinatione3
Value
4-5 weekse3
Qualifier
The difference in pretreatment needede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sargentii
Malus sargentii · TaxonChrumps · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight pretreatment temperatures ranging from 0.5°C to 18.5°C were tested on two Malus sargentii seed lots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–455 · show in text ↑
e3

“The difference in pretreatment needed to obtain maximum germination was 4-5 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1492 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve weeks of pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds

Taxon
M. sieboldiiMalus sieboldiie4
Outcome
break dormancye4
Value
Twelve weekse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sieboldii
Malus sieboldii · TaxonWouter Hagens · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Twelve weeks pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds, but at least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break the seed dormancy of M. sargentii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1670 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break seed dormancy of M. sargentii

Taxon
M. sargentiiMalus sargentiie4
Outcome
break the seed dormancye4
Value
15-16 weekse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sargentii
Malus sargentii · TaxonChrumps · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Twelve weeks pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds, but at least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break the seed dormancy of M. sargentii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1670 · show in text ↑