By organism › Green plants › Rosaceae › Malus sargentii

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malus sargentii and M. mandshurica were among the most promising apple tree types for urban conditions.

Taxon: M. sargentii, M. mandshuricaMalus mandshuricaMalus sargentiie1
Outcome: most promising types of apple trees for use in urban conditionse1

Verbatim

t0
“apple tree”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35

e1
“the most promising types of apple trees for use in urban conditions were identified: Malus baccata, M. neidzwedzkyana, M. x zumi, M. sargentii, M. mandshurica by a set of parameters”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–713

Title

Prospects for the use of apple tree species from the collection of the GBS RAS in landscaping

Victоria Kryuchkova; Vitaly Donskih; Yuri Gorbunov; et al. АгроЭкоИнфо 2022. doi:10.51419/202126622.

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malus sargentii scored 29 points and had a compact crown, many flowers and dark red fruit.

Taxon: Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Outcome: compact rounded crowne0
Value: 29 pointse0
Qualifier: a large number of flowers with a diameter of 30 mme0

Verbatim

e0
“Malus sargentii Rehder (29 points) was notable for its compact rounded crown, a large number of flowers with a diameter of 30 mm, followed by the formation of fruits with a dark red color.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1342

Title

Evaluation of the aesthetic qualities and adaptability of introduced ornamental apple trees from the genetic collection of the Orenburg Branch of the Federal Horticultural Research Center for Breeding, Agrotechnology and Nursery

E. M. Feschenko POMICULTURE & SMALL FRUITS CULTURE IN RUSSIA 2021. doi:10.31676/2073-4948-2021-67-78-98

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nectaries were orange-yellow and hypanthial.

Taxon: Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Outcome: orange-yellow coloured and they represent the hypanthial typee0

Verbatim

e0
“The nectaries of Malus sargentii are orange-yellow coloured and they represent the hypanthial type”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–991

Title

Characteristics of blooming, floral nectaries and nectar of Malus sargentii Rehd.

Elżbieta Weryszko-Chmielewska; Marta Dmitruk Acta Agrobotanica 2012. doi:10.5586/aa.2009.003

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Flower opening peaked between 11:00 and 13:00.
Observation Insect visitation was greatest during the peak flower opening period.
Observation Bees accounted for 90% of flower visitors.
Observation Bumblebees accounted for 6% of flower visitors.
Observation Butterflies accounted for 4% of flower visitors.
Observation Flowers lived five days.
Observation Flowers produced an average of 0.71 mg nectar.
Observation Nectar sugar content averaged 32%.
Observation The protruding nectariferous tissue classifies the nectaries as automorphic.
Observation Nectary epidermal cells had distinct cuticle folds.
Observation A few stomata occurred only at the nectary base.
Observation At the beginning of flowering, all stomata were closed.
Observation Secretion traces occurred near developed outer cuticular ledges.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy

Taxon: Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Treatment: Temperatures above 9°Ce1
Outcome: seed dormancye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Eight pretreatment temperatures ranging from 0.5°C to 18.5°C were tested on two Malus sargentii seed lots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–455

e1
“Temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy, 0.5°C and 4.0°C were equally efficient in releasing the dormancy, but only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–653

Title

Effect of temperatures during seed development and pretreatment on seed dormancy of Malus sargentii and M. sieboldii

K.A. Thomsen; E.N. Eriksen Seed Science and Technology 2006. doi:10.15258/sst.2006.34.1.25

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Pretreatment at 0.5°C and 4.0°C was equally efficient in releasing seed dormancy
Observation Only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had lower seed moisture contents than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime were less dormant than at the lowest regime
Observation The difference in pretreatment needed for maximum germination was 4-5 weeks
Observation Twelve weeks of pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds
Observation At least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break seed dormancy of M. sargentii

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment at 0.5°C and 4.0°C was equally efficient in releasing seed dormancy

Taxon: Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Treatment: 0.5°C and 4.0°Ce1
Outcome: releasing the dormancye1

Verbatim

e0
“Eight pretreatment temperatures ranging from 0.5°C to 18.5°C were tested on two Malus sargentii seed lots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–455

e1
“Temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy, 0.5°C and 4.0°C were equally efficient in releasing the dormancy, but only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–653

Title

Effect of temperatures during seed development and pretreatment on seed dormancy of Malus sargentii and M. sieboldii

K.A. Thomsen; E.N. Eriksen Seed Science and Technology 2006. doi:10.15258/sst.2006.34.1.25

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Pretreatment temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy
Observation Only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had lower seed moisture contents than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime were less dormant than at the lowest regime
Observation The difference in pretreatment needed for maximum germination was 4-5 weeks
Observation Twelve weeks of pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds
Observation At least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break seed dormancy of M. sargentii

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment

Taxon: Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Treatment: pretreated at 4°Ce1
Outcome: germinated during pretreatmente1

Verbatim

e0
“Eight pretreatment temperatures ranging from 0.5°C to 18.5°C were tested on two Malus sargentii seed lots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–455

e1
“Temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy, 0.5°C and 4.0°C were equally efficient in releasing the dormancy, but only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–653

Title

Effect of temperatures during seed development and pretreatment on seed dormancy of Malus sargentii and M. sieboldii

K.A. Thomsen; E.N. Eriksen Seed Science and Technology 2006. doi:10.15258/sst.2006.34.1.25

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Pretreatment temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy
Observation Pretreatment at 0.5°C and 4.0°C was equally efficient in releasing seed dormancy
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had lower seed moisture contents than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime were less dormant than at the lowest regime
Observation The difference in pretreatment needed for maximum germination was 4-5 weeks
Observation Twelve weeks of pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds
Observation At least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break seed dormancy of M. sargentii

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights than at the lowest regime

Taxon: M. sargentiiMalus sargentiie2
Treatment: highest temperature regimee2
Outcome: seed weightse2
Direction: highere2
Comparator: lowest temperature regimee2

Verbatim

e2
“M. sargentii seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights, lower seed moisture contents and were less dormant than seeds developed at the lowest temperature regime”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1409

Title

Effect of temperatures during seed development and pretreatment on seed dormancy of Malus sargentii and M. sieboldii

K.A. Thomsen; E.N. Eriksen Seed Science and Technology 2006. doi:10.15258/sst.2006.34.1.25

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Pretreatment temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy
Observation Pretreatment at 0.5°C and 4.0°C was equally efficient in releasing seed dormancy
Observation Only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had lower seed moisture contents than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime were less dormant than at the lowest regime
Observation The difference in pretreatment needed for maximum germination was 4-5 weeks
Observation Twelve weeks of pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds
Observation At least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break seed dormancy of M. sargentii

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had lower seed moisture contents than at the lowest regime

Taxon: M. sargentiiMalus sargentiie2
Treatment: highest temperature regimee2
Outcome: seed moisture contentse2
Direction: lowere2
Comparator: lowest temperature regimee2

Verbatim

e2
“M. sargentii seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights, lower seed moisture contents and were less dormant than seeds developed at the lowest temperature regime”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1409

Title

Effect of temperatures during seed development and pretreatment on seed dormancy of Malus sargentii and M. sieboldii

K.A. Thomsen; E.N. Eriksen Seed Science and Technology 2006. doi:10.15258/sst.2006.34.1.25

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Pretreatment temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy
Observation Pretreatment at 0.5°C and 4.0°C was equally efficient in releasing seed dormancy
Observation Only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime were less dormant than at the lowest regime
Observation The difference in pretreatment needed for maximum germination was 4-5 weeks
Observation Twelve weeks of pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds
Observation At least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break seed dormancy of M. sargentii

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime were less dormant than at the lowest regime

Taxon: M. sargentiiMalus sargentiie2
Treatment: highest temperature regimee2
Outcome: seed dormancye1
Direction: less dormante2
Comparator: lowest temperature regimee2

Verbatim

e1
“Temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy, 0.5°C and 4.0°C were equally efficient in releasing the dormancy, but only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–653

e2
“M. sargentii seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights, lower seed moisture contents and were less dormant than seeds developed at the lowest temperature regime”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1409

Title

Effect of temperatures during seed development and pretreatment on seed dormancy of Malus sargentii and M. sieboldii

K.A. Thomsen; E.N. Eriksen Seed Science and Technology 2006. doi:10.15258/sst.2006.34.1.25

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Pretreatment temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy
Observation Pretreatment at 0.5°C and 4.0°C was equally efficient in releasing seed dormancy
Observation Only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had lower seed moisture contents than at the lowest regime
Observation The difference in pretreatment needed for maximum germination was 4-5 weeks
Observation Twelve weeks of pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds
Observation At least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break seed dormancy of M. sargentii

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The difference in pretreatment needed for maximum germination was 4-5 weeks

Taxon: Malus sargentiiMalus sargentiie0
Outcome: maximum germinatione3
Value: 4-5 weekse3
Qualifier: The difference in pretreatment needede3

Verbatim

e0
“Eight pretreatment temperatures ranging from 0.5°C to 18.5°C were tested on two Malus sargentii seed lots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–455

e3
“The difference in pretreatment needed to obtain maximum germination was 4-5 weeks”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1492

Title

Effect of temperatures during seed development and pretreatment on seed dormancy of Malus sargentii and M. sieboldii

K.A. Thomsen; E.N. Eriksen Seed Science and Technology 2006. doi:10.15258/sst.2006.34.1.25

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Pretreatment temperatures above 9°C had no significant effect on seed dormancy
Observation Pretreatment at 0.5°C and 4.0°C was equally efficient in releasing seed dormancy
Observation Only seeds pretreated at 4°C germinated during pretreatment
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had higher seed weights than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime had lower seed moisture contents than at the lowest regime
Intervention effect Seeds developed at the highest temperature regime were less dormant than at the lowest regime
Observation Twelve weeks of pretreatment was sufficient to break dormancy in M. sieboldii seeds
Observation At least 15-16 weeks of pretreatment was needed to break seed dormancy of M. sargentii

Malus sargentii 23 claims

23 claims