Abstract
SummaryTomato seedlings (cvs. 'Fanny' and 'Goldmar') were grafted onto the tomato rootstock hybrid AR-9704, using the cleft grafting method, and grown under greenhouse conditions. Tomato fruit yield and quality from plants exposed to 0, 30 or 60 mM NaCl, comparing grafted with ungrafted plants, was studied. Fruit yield was determined, and the chemical quality of fruit was analysed by measurements of sugars, lycopene, -carotene, ascorbic acid and mineral composition, and by determination of titratable acidity and soluble solids. Fruit yield was higher in grafted than in ungrafted plants for both varieties, for 0, 30 and 60 mM NaCl. Salinity increased soluble solids, glucose and fructose, mainly at 60 mM NaCl, while ascorbic acid increased significantly only for grafted plants at 0 mM NaCl. The concentrations of-carotene and lycopene were not affected by salinity, but a large increase due to grafting was observed for all treatments. Sodium, chloride and nitrate ion concentrations were higher in ungrafted than in grafted plants, for the 60 mM NaCl treatment. Thus, grafting could be a useful tool to increase tomato fruit quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted plants yielded more fruit than ungrafted plants across varieties and salt levels.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- graftede0
- Outcome
- Fruit yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- 0, 30 and 60 mM NaCle0
- Comparator
- ungrafted plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit yield was higher in grafted than in ungrafted plants for both varieties, for 0, 30 and 60 mM NaCl”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity increased soluble solids, glucose and fructose, mainly at 60 mM NaCl.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Salinitye0
- Outcome
- soluble solids, glucose and fructosee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 60 mM NaCle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Salinity increased soluble solids, glucose and fructose, mainly at 60 mM NaCl”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Ascorbic acid increased significantly only in grafted plants without added NaCl.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- grafted plantse0
- Outcome
- ascorbic acide0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 0 mM NaCle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“ascorbic acid increased significantly only for grafted plants at 0 mM NaCl”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not affect carotene and lycopene concentrations.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- salinitye0
- Outcome
- concentrations of-carotene and lycopenee0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The concentrations of-carotene and lycopene were not affected by salinity”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting greatly increased carotene and lycopene concentrations at all salinity treatments.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- graftinge0
- Outcome
- carotene and lycopenee1
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- all treatmentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“a large increase due to grafting was observed for all treatments”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tomato”
e1“The concentrations of-carotene and lycopene were not affected by salinity”
Claim · model-written summary
Ungrafted plants had higher sodium, chloride and nitrate ion concentrations than grafted plants at 60 mM NaCl.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- grafted plantse0
- Outcome
- Sodium, chloride and nitrate ion concentrationse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- 60 mM NaCle0
- Comparator
- ungraftede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Sodium, chloride and nitrate ion concentrations were higher in ungrafted than in grafted plants, for the 60 mM NaCl treatment”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that grafting could improve tomato fruit quality.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- graftinge0
- Outcome
- increase tomato fruit qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“grafting could be a useful tool to increase tomato fruit quality”
t0“Tomato”
t1“Tomato”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →salinity · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →grafting · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- no effect
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →grafting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
172 papers more in this group
See all 176 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.