Paper · 2004 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Fruit quality of grafted tomato plants grown under saline conditions

Nieves Fernández-Garcí; Vicente Martínez; Antonio Cerdá; et al.

7
claims
22
verbatim quotes
123
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryTomato seedlings (cvs. 'Fanny' and 'Goldmar') were grafted onto the tomato rootstock hybrid AR-9704, using the cleft grafting method, and grown under greenhouse conditions. Tomato fruit yield and quality from plants exposed to 0, 30 or 60 mM NaCl, comparing grafted with ungrafted plants, was studied. Fruit yield was determined, and the chemical quality of fruit was analysed by measurements of sugars, lycopene, -carotene, ascorbic acid and mineral composition, and by determination of titratable acidity and soluble solids. Fruit yield was higher in grafted than in ungrafted plants for both varieties, for 0, 30 and 60 mM NaCl. Salinity increased soluble solids, glucose and fructose, mainly at 60 mM NaCl, while ascorbic acid increased significantly only for grafted plants at 0 mM NaCl. The concentrations of-carotene and lycopene were not affected by salinity, but a large increase due to grafting was observed for all treatments. Sodium, chloride and nitrate ion concentrations were higher in ungrafted than in grafted plants, for the 60 mM NaCl treatment. Thus, grafting could be a useful tool to increase tomato fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants yielded more fruit than ungrafted plants across varieties and salt levels.

Treatment
graftede0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
0, 30 and 60 mM NaCle0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield was higher in grafted than in ungrafted plants for both varieties, for 0, 30 and 60 mM NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased soluble solids, glucose and fructose, mainly at 60 mM NaCl.

Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
soluble solids, glucose and fructosee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
60 mM NaCle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity increased soluble solids, glucose and fructose, mainly at 60 mM NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid increased significantly only in grafted plants without added NaCl.

Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
0 mM NaCle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbic acid increased significantly only for grafted plants at 0 mM NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not affect carotene and lycopene concentrations.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
concentrations of-carotene and lycopenee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of-carotene and lycopene were not affected by salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting greatly increased carotene and lycopene concentrations at all salinity treatments.

Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
carotene and lycopenee1
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
all treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a large increase due to grafting was observed for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“The concentrations of-carotene and lycopene were not affected by salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungrafted plants had higher sodium, chloride and nitrate ion concentrations than grafted plants at 60 mM NaCl.

Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
Sodium, chloride and nitrate ion concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
60 mM NaCle0
Comparator
ungraftede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium, chloride and nitrate ion concentrations were higher in ungrafted than in grafted plants, for the 60 mM NaCl treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that grafting could improve tomato fruit quality.

Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
increase tomato fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafting could be a useful tool to increase tomato fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

salinity · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

33 papers: 25 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

grafting · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

grafting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 151 positive, 25 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.