Abstract
The influence of dual inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and Rhizobium was assessed on garden pea productivity, root morphology and soil fertility during 2011–2012 at Palampur, India, in a medium phosphorus (P) acid Alfisol. Field experimentation comprised 13 treatments involving Rhizobium, AMF and inorganic fertilizers in (RBD) replicated thrice. The dual inoculation of Rhizobium and AMF exhibited nominal effect on pea pod length, pod girth and number of seeds per pod. However, average pod weight (APW) and productivity increased by 14.1 and 20% following dual inoculation, respectively, over generalized recommended nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) dose general recommended dose (GRD). Dual inoculation of pea seed with both symbionts sharply increased the root volume (RV), root dry weight (RDW), root weight density (RWD) and root nodules per plant by 34.5, 13.3, 13 and 44%, respectively. Similarly, the highest AMF root colonization was registered under dual-inoculated plots compared to sole application of Rhizobium or AMF. Different treatments including dual-inoculated ones did not alter the soil organic carbon (SOC), available N, K and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-extractable micronutrients iron, zinc, copper and manganese (Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn) status significantly; however, a nominal buildup in the above-mentioned parameters was registered under dual inoculation. Available P status increased to the tune of 6.7 and 8.7% following dual inoculation with Rhizobium and AMF over their respective sole inoculations. Overall, the current study suggests that Glomus–Rhizobium symbiosis has great potential in enhancing productivity through better proliferation of the root system and improved soil fertility status. Furthermore, dual inoculation of AMF and Rhizobium can save up to 25% fertilizer N and P in garden pea in acid Alfisol of the northwestern Himalayas (NWH).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation had a nominal effect on pea pod length, girth and seeds per pod.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Treatment
- dual inoculation of Rhizobium and AMFe0
- Second interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- pea pod length, pod girth and number of seeds per pode0
RhizobiumNot reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The dual inoculation of Rhizobium and AMF exhibited nominal effect on pea pod length, pod girth and number of seeds per pod.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation increased average pod weight by 14.1% over the recommended NPK dose.
- Taxon
- Garden PeaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- dual inoculatione0
- Outcome
- average pod weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 14.1e0
- Comparator
- generalized recommended nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) dosee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average pod weight (APW) and productivity increased by 14.1 and 20% following dual inoculation, respectively, over generalized recommended nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) dose general recommended dose (GRD).”
t0“Garden Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation increased productivity by 20% over the recommended NPK dose.
- Taxon
- Garden PeaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- dual inoculatione0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 20%e0
- Comparator
- generalized recommended nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) dosee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average pod weight (APW) and productivity increased by 14.1 and 20% following dual inoculation, respectively, over generalized recommended nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) dose general recommended dose (GRD).”
t0“Garden Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation increased root volume by 34.5%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Organ / stage
- roote0
- Treatment
- Dual inoculatione0
- Outcome
- root volumee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 34.5e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dual inoculation of pea seed with both symbionts sharply increased the root volume (RV), root dry weight (RDW), root weight density (RWD) and root nodules per plant by 34.5, 13.3, 13 and 44%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation increased root dry weight by 13.3%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Dual inoculatione0
- Outcome
- root dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 13.3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dual inoculation of pea seed with both symbionts sharply increased the root volume (RV), root dry weight (RDW), root weight density (RWD) and root nodules per plant by 34.5, 13.3, 13 and 44%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation increased root weight density by 13%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Dual inoculatione0
- Outcome
- root weight densitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 13e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dual inoculation of pea seed with both symbionts sharply increased the root volume (RV), root dry weight (RDW), root weight density (RWD) and root nodules per plant by 34.5, 13.3, 13 and 44%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation increased root nodules per plant by 44%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Dual inoculatione0
- Outcome
- root nodules per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 44%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dual inoculation of pea seed with both symbionts sharply increased the root volume (RV), root dry weight (RDW), root weight density (RWD) and root nodules per plant by 34.5, 13.3, 13 and 44%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation produced the highest AMF root colonization compared with either sole inoculation.
- Taxon
- Garden PeaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- dual-inoculated plotse0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- AMF root colonizatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- sole application of Rhizobium or AMFe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest AMF root colonization was registered under dual-inoculated plots compared to sole application of Rhizobium or AMF.”
t0“Garden Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments did not significantly alter soil organic carbon, available N or K, or extractable micronutrients.
- Taxon
- Garden PeaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Different treatments including dual-inoculated onese0
- Outcome
- soil organic carbon (SOC), available N, K and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-extractable micronutrients iron, zinc, copper and manganese (Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn) statuse0
- Direction
- did not altere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different treatments including dual-inoculated ones did not alter the soil organic carbon (SOC), available N, K and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-extractable micronutrients iron, zinc, copper and manganese (Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn) status significantly”
t0“Garden Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation nominally increased the listed soil fertility parameters.
- Taxon
- Garden PeaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- dual inoculatione0
- Outcome
- above-mentioned parameterse0
- Direction
- buildupe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a nominal buildup in the above-mentioned parameters was registered under dual inoculation”
t0“Garden Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation increased available P by 6.7% over sole Rhizobium inoculation.
- Taxon
- Garden PeaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- dual inoculation with Rhizobium and AMFe0
- Outcome
- Available P statuse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6.7e0
- Comparator
- respective sole inoculationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Available P status increased to the tune of 6.7 and 8.7% following dual inoculation with Rhizobium and AMF over their respective sole inoculations.”
t0“Garden Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation increased available P by 8.7% over sole AMF inoculation.
- Taxon
- Garden PeaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- dual inoculation with Rhizobium and AMFe0
- Outcome
- Available P statuse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 8.7%e0
- Comparator
- respective sole inoculationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Available P status increased to the tune of 6.7 and 8.7% following dual inoculation with Rhizobium and AMF over their respective sole inoculations.”
t0“Garden Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that Glomus–Rhizobium symbiosis can enhance productivity through root proliferation and soil fertility.
- Taxon
- Garden PeaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Qualifier
- better proliferation of the root system and improved soil fertility statuse0
GlomusOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glomus–Rhizobium symbiosis has great potential in enhancing productivity through better proliferation of the root system and improved soil fertility status.”
t0“Garden Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude dual inoculation can save up to 25% fertilizer N and P in garden pea.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- save up to 25% fertilizer N and Pe0
- Value
- 25%e0
- Setting
- northwestern Himalayase0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dual inoculation of AMF and Rhizobium can save up to 25% fertilizer N and P in garden pea in acid Alfisol of the northwestern Himalayas (NWH).”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →inoculation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →inoculation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- negative
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.