Paper · 1991 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Effects of temperature and irradiance on stigma exsertion, ovule viability and embryo development in tomato

R. Fernandez-Muñoz; J. Cuartero

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryPlants of tomato cvs Marroquí, Moneymaker and Red Top were grown under four experimental conditions: high temperature (33/23°C, day/night) with summer light (467 nmol m_2s_l) (HTNI), high temperature (33/23°C) with low light (280 |nmol irT2s_l) HTLI), low temperature (27/4°C) with winter light (291 nmol m_2s_l) (LTNI), and low temperature (27/4°C) with low light (175 |imol nT2s_l) (LTLI), to study effects on stigma levels (defined as the difference between pistil length (PL) and stamen length (SL)) and ovule viability, in flowers at five phenological stages of flower-opening. Other plants of the same cultivars were treated by LT during the initial phase of embryo development and compared with controls grown at normal temperatures. In fully opened flowers of ‘Marroquí’ and ‘Moneymaker’, stigma levels were highest under HT, although stigmatic exsertion was significant only in ‘Moneymaker’. Stigma levels of ‘Red Top’ depended little on temperature. Stigma levels produced by LI were higher than those of NI, but illumination.had less effect than temperature. Variations of stigma level with treatment depended more on SL than PL. Exsertion followed treatment only at phenologically advanced stages (petals and sepals open more than 45°). Temperature and light did not affect ovule viability, although HTLI showed least ovule viability. Ovules under HT were significantly more receptive early in development than those under LT. Winter failures of tomato fruit-set appear not to result from effects on stigma level or ovule viability, or by an early interruption of embryo development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In fully opened Marroquí flowers, stigma level was highest under high temperature.

Material
Marroquíe0
Organ / stage
fully opened flowerse0
Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
stigma levelse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In fully opened flowers of ‘Marroquí’ and ‘Moneymaker’, stigma levels were highest under HT, although stigmatic exsertion was significant only in ‘Moneymaker’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In fully opened Moneymaker flowers, stigma level was highest under high temperature and stigmatic exsertion was significant.

Material
Moneymakere0
Organ / stage
fully opened flowerse0
Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
stigma levelse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In fully opened flowers of ‘Marroquí’ and ‘Moneymaker’, stigma levels were highest under HT, although stigmatic exsertion was significant only in ‘Moneymaker’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red Top stigma levels depended little on temperature.

Material
Red Tope0
Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
Stigma levelse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stigma levels of ‘Red Top’ depended little on temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light produced higher stigma levels than normal illumination.

Treatment
LIe0
Outcome
Stigma levelse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stigma levels produced by LI were higher than those of NI, but illumination.had less effect than temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Illumination affected stigma levels less than temperature did.

Treatment
illuminatione0
Outcome
Stigma levelse0
Direction
less effecte0
Comparator
temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stigma levels produced by LI were higher than those of NI, but illumination.had less effect than temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment-related variation in stigma level depended more on stamen length than pistil length.

Organ / stage
stamene1
Outcome
Variations of stigma levele0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
PLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variations of stigma level with treatment depended more on SL than PL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“stigma levels (defined as the difference between pistil length (PL) and stamen length (SL))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stigma exsertion followed treatment only at advanced flower-opening stages.

Organ / stage
phenologically advanced stagese0
Outcome
Exsertion followed treatmente0
Qualifier
petals and sepals open more than 45°e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exsertion followed treatment only at phenologically advanced stages (petals and sepals open more than 45°).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature and light did not affect tomato ovule viability.

Treatment
Temperature and lighte0
Outcome
ovule viabilitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Temperature and light did not affect ovule viability, although HTLI showed least ovule viability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high temperature and low light treatment showed the least ovule viability.

Treatment
HTLIe0
Outcome
ovule viabilitye0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Temperature and light did not affect ovule viability, although HTLI showed least ovule viability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ovules under high temperature were significantly more receptive early in development than under low temperature.

Organ / stage
early in developmente0
Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
Ovulese0
Direction
more receptivee0
Comparator
LTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ovules under HT were significantly more receptive early in development than those under LT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that winter failures of tomato fruit set appear unrelated to stigma level, ovule viability, or early embryo interruption.

Outcome
Winter failures of tomato fruit-sete0
Qualifier
appear not to result from effects on stigma level or ovule viability, or by an early interruption of embryo developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter failures of tomato fruit-set appear not to result from effects on stigma level or ovule viability, or by an early interruption of embryo development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1602 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 155 positive, 71 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.