Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology

Study on Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.) Infected with Meloidogyne incognita under the Influence of Pseudomonas fluorescens, Bacillus subtilis and Urea

Ambreen Akhtar Hisamuddin

8
claims
35
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Pot studies were carried out to assess the growth and biochemical components of Vigna mungo L. cultivar 'Azad-2' with the root-knot nematode and treated with two biofertilizers viz. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0, and Bacillus subtilis strain Bs-5. The plants were grown in soil at N50 and N100 doses of urea. Uninoculated untreated plants served as control. From the results, it was evident that V. mungo plants exhibited profused vegetative growth at N100 dose of urea as was observed in the treatment 5. The plants of treatment 5 were inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml). The number of nodules per plant was found increased to 14.33 per plant, total chlorophyll content by 2.91 mg/g of leaf tissue, leghaemoglobin by 3.81 mg/g, and protein content in leaves and seeds by 0.83 and 0.76 mg/g, respectively, when compared with the control and the plants that received different doses of B. subtilis Bs-5 in the absence of the root-knot nematode. Significant reduction in gall number (41.66) and number of nematodes per gram of root (4.66) was recorded in the treatment 5.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. fluorescens CHA0 increased nodules per plant to 14.33 compared with the control.

Taxon
Vigna mungo L.Vigna mungoe0
Material
Azad-2e0
Organ / stage
nodulese2
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)e1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
number of nodules per plante2
Direction
increasede2
Value
14.33 per plante2
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Pot studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot studies were carried out to assess the growth and biochemical components of Vigna mungo L. cultivar 'Azad-2' with the root-knot nematode and treated with two biofertilizers viz. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants of treatment 5 were inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–586 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of nodules per plant was found increased to 14.33 per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–658 · show in text ↑
e3

“when compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. fluorescens CHA0 increased total chlorophyll content in leaves by 2.91 mg/g compared with the control.

Taxon
Vigna mungo L.Vigna mungoe0
Material
Azad-2e0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuee4
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)e1
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente4
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
2.91 mg/ge4
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Pot studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot studies were carried out to assess the growth and biochemical components of Vigna mungo L. cultivar 'Azad-2' with the root-knot nematode and treated with two biofertilizers viz. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants of treatment 5 were inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–586 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of nodules per plant was found increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“when compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–851 · show in text ↑
e4

“total chlorophyll content by 2.91 mg/g of leaf tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. fluorescens CHA0 increased leghaemoglobin by 3.81 mg/g compared with the control.

Taxon
Vigna mungo L.Vigna mungoe0
Material
Azad-2e0
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)e1
Outcome
leghaemoglobine5
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
3.81 mg/ge5
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Pot studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot studies were carried out to assess the growth and biochemical components of Vigna mungo L. cultivar 'Azad-2' with the root-knot nematode and treated with two biofertilizers viz. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants of treatment 5 were inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–586 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of nodules per plant was found increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“when compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–851 · show in text ↑
e5

“leghaemoglobin by 3.81 mg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. fluorescens CHA0 increased protein content in leaves by 0.83 compared with the control.

Taxon
Vigna mungo L.Vigna mungoe0
Material
Azad-2e0
Organ / stage
leavese6
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)e1
Outcome
protein content in leavese6
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
0.83e6
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Pot studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot studies were carried out to assess the growth and biochemical components of Vigna mungo L. cultivar 'Azad-2' with the root-knot nematode and treated with two biofertilizers viz. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants of treatment 5 were inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–586 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of nodules per plant was found increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“when compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–851 · show in text ↑
e6

“protein content in leaves and seeds by 0.83 and 0.76 mg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. fluorescens CHA0 increased protein content in seeds by 0.76 mg/g compared with the control.

Taxon
Vigna mungo L.Vigna mungoe0
Material
Azad-2e0
Organ / stage
seedse6
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)e1
Outcome
protein contente6
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
0.76 mg/ge6
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Pot studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot studies were carried out to assess the growth and biochemical components of Vigna mungo L. cultivar 'Azad-2' with the root-knot nematode and treated with two biofertilizers viz. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants of treatment 5 were inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–586 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of nodules per plant was found increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–639 · show in text ↑
e3

“when compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–851 · show in text ↑
e6

“protein content in leaves and seeds by 0.83 and 0.76 mg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 5 (P. fluorescens CHA0 with urea) reduced gall number on black gram infected with Meloidogyne incognita to 41.66, compared with untreated plants.

Taxon
Vigna mungo L.Vigna mungoe0
Material
Azad-2e0
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)e1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
gall numbere5
Direction
reductione5
Value
41.66e5
Comparator
Uninoculated untreated plantse6
Setting
Pot studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pot studies were carried out to assess the growth and biochemical components of Vigna mungo L. cultivar 'Azad-2' with the root-knot nematode and treated with two biofertilizers viz. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants of treatment 5 were inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–586 · show in text ↑
e5

“Significant reduction in gall number (41.66)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1003 · show in text ↑
e6

“Uninoculated untreated plants served as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 5 (P. fluorescens CHA0 with urea) reduced the number of nematodes per gram of root to 4.66, compared with untreated plants.

Taxon
Vigna mungo L.Vigna mungoe0
Material
Azad-2e0
Treatment
inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)e1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of nematodes per gram of roote7
Direction
reductione7
Value
4.66e7
Comparator
Uninoculated untreated plantse6
Setting
Pot studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pot studies were carried out to assess the growth and biochemical components of Vigna mungo L. cultivar 'Azad-2' with the root-knot nematode and treated with two biofertilizers viz. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants of treatment 5 were inoculated with P. fluorescens CHA0 (20 ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–586 · show in text ↑
e6

“Uninoculated untreated plants served as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–362 · show in text ↑
e7

“Significant reduction in gall number (41.66) and number of nematodes per gram of root (4.66)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1051 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram plants showed profuse vegetative growth at the N100 urea dose in treatment 5.

Taxon
V. mungoVigna mungoe7
Treatment
N100 dose of ureae7
Outcome
vegetative growthe7
Qualifier
profusede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“V. mungo plants exhibited profused vegetative growth at N100 dose of urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–475 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · symbiosis · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.