Paper · 2004 · Tree Physiology

Morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings to grass-induced belowground competition

L. Coll; P. Balandier; C. Picon-Cochard

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
84
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions. Two-year-old beech seedlings were grown during two growing seasons in 160-l containers in bare soil or with a mixture of five grass species widely represented in semi-natural meadows of central France. At the end of the second growing season, beech seedlings in the presence of grass showed significant reductions in diameter and height growth, annual shoot elongation, and stem, root and leaf biomass, but an increase in root to shoot biomass ratio. Grasses greatly reduced soil water availability, which was positively correlated with daily seedling diameter increment. Beech seedlings seemed to respond to water deficit by anticipating stomatal closure. There was evidence of competition for nitrogen (N) by grasses, but its effect on seedling development could not be separated from that of competition for water. By labeling the plants with 15N, we showed that beech seedlings absorbed little N when grasses were present, whereas grasses took up more than 97% of the total N absorbed in the container. We conclude that, even if beech seedlings display morphological and physiological adaptation to below ground competition, their development in full-light conditions may be strongly restricted by competition from grass species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass presence reduced diameter and height growth and annual shoot elongation of beech seedlings.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Treatment
presence of grasse1
Outcome
diameter and height growth, annual shoot elongatione1
Direction
reductionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the end of the second growing season, beech seedlings in the presence of grass showed significant reductions in diameter and height growth, annual shoot elongation, and stem, root and leaf biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass presence reduced stem, root and leaf biomass of beech seedlings.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Treatment
presence of grasse1
Outcome
stem, root and leaf biomasse1
Direction
reductionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the end of the second growing season, beech seedlings in the presence of grass showed significant reductions in diameter and height growth, annual shoot elongation, and stem, root and leaf biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass presence increased the root to shoot biomass ratio of beech seedlings.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Treatment
presence of grasse1
Outcome
root to shoot biomass ratioe2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“beech seedlings in the presence of grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–445 · show in text ↑
e2

“but an increase in root to shoot biomass ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grasses reduced soil water availability.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Treatment
Grassese3
Outcome
soil water availabilitye3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grasses greatly reduced soil water availability, which was positively correlated with daily seedling diameter increment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–732 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil water availability was positively correlated with daily seedling diameter increment of beech seedlings in full light.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Outcome
daily seedling diameter incremente3
Direction
positively correlatede3
Qualifier
soil water availabilitye3
Setting
full-light conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grasses greatly reduced soil water availability, which was positively correlated with daily seedling diameter increment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–732 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Beech seedlings seem to anticipate water deficit by closing stomata early.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Outcome
anticipating stomatal closuree4
Qualifier
water deficite4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e4

“Beech seedlings seemed to respond to water deficit by anticipating stomatal closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–817 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

There was evidence of competition for nitrogen by grasses, which could not be separated from competition for water.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Treatment
grassese5
Outcome
competition for nitrogene5
Qualifier
could not be separated from that of competition for watere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was evidence of competition for nitrogen (N) by grasses, but its effect on seedling development could not be separated from that of competition for water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beech seedlings absorbed little nitrogen when grasses were present.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Treatment
grasses were presente6
Outcome
absorbed little Ne6
Direction
littlee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e6

“By labeling the plants with 15N, we showed that beech seedlings absorbed little N when grasses were present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1087 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grasses took up more than 97% of the total nitrogen absorbed in the container.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Interactor
grassese6other
Outcome
total N absorbed in the containere6
Value
more than 97%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas grasses took up more than 97% of the total N absorbed in the container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass competition may strongly restrict the development of beech seedlings in full-light conditions.

Taxon
Fagus sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Treatment
competition from grass speciese7
Outcome
developmente7
Direction
restrictede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full-light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e7

“their development in full-light conditions may be strongly restricted by competition from grass species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1394 · show in text ↑

competition · growth · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.