Paper · 1959 · Journal of Agricultural Meteorology

The Change of Water-Content and the Injury of Rice Plant by the Wind Treatment (1)

Y. TSUBOI; S. KUBO

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to make clear the mechanism of reduction of water-content in rice plants by wind, we have studied on the water-contents of them.Results are as follows:(1) The water-contents in each organ of the rice plant grown under normal condition increased in order of ear, leaf and stem, and their variances decreased in the same order.(2) When the water supply from root was intercepted, the plants began to wilt. However, younger leaves showed a small decrease in the water-content, and had a large resistance against dehydration. Because the wilting occurs by a slight decrease in water-content, it is difficult to measure the decrease at the beginning of wilting.The reduction of water-content in the ear was smaller than that in the leaves, but it fluctuated by number of days after heading.The reduction of water-content was smallest in the stem.(3) The critical water-content for the recovery from wilting was different by the stage of growth of rice plants. Before milky ripe period it was about 50 per cent, and about 60 per cecnt in waxy ripe period.(4) The reduction of water-contents in each organ of rice plants treated by wind have been observed.In a leaf, the reduction of water-content was considerably large in the upper half part of leaf blade No differences in the reduction of water-content were recognized between the sites of leaves. The differences of water-content between the ears of treated and untreated were not clear in the present experiment.The reduction of water-content in the stem was smallest, but when the stem have had a young head before heading it was considerably large.Under the condition of stronger wind and of longer duration of treatment, the reduction of water-conteant was more remarkable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under normal conditions, rice water content increased from ear to leaf to stem.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
ear, leaf and steme0
Outcome
water-contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water-contents in each organ of the rice plant grown under normal condition increased in order of ear, leaf and stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-content variance decreased from ear to leaf to stem.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Outcome
variancese0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their variances decreased in the same order.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice plants began wilting when root water supply was intercepted.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Treatment
water supply from root was interceptede0
Outcome
began to wilte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the water supply from root was intercepted, the plants began to wilt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Younger leaves had a small decrease in water content and greater dehydration resistance.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
younger leavese0
Outcome
small decrease in the water-contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“younger leaves showed a small decrease in the water-content, and had a large resistance against dehydration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction of water content in ears was smaller than in leaves.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
eare0
Outcome
reduction of water-contente0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of water-content in the ear was smaller than that in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear water-content reduction fluctuated with days after heading.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
headinge0
Outcome
fluctuatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it fluctuated by number of days after heading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem water-content reduction was the smallest among organs after water-supply interception.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
reduction of water-contente0
Direction
smalleste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of water-content was smallest in the stem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical water content for recovery from wilting was about 50 per cent before milky ripe period.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
milky ripe periode0
Outcome
critical water-content for the recovery from wiltinge0
Value
about 50 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical water-content for the recovery from wilting was different by the stage of growth of rice plants. Before milky ripe period it was about 50 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical water content for wilting recovery was about 60 per cecnt in waxy ripe period.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
waxy ripe periode0
Outcome
critical water-content for the recovery from wiltinge0
Value
about 60 per cecnte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical water-content for the recovery from wilting was different by the stage of growth of rice plants. Before milky ripe period it was about 50 per cent, and about 60 per cecnt in waxy ripe period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wind reduced water content considerably in the upper half of the leaf blade.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
upper half part of leaf bladee0
Treatment
winde0
Outcome
reduction of water-contente0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of water-contents in each organ of rice plants treated by wind have been observed.In a leaf, the reduction of water-content was considerably large in the upper half part of leaf blade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf sites did not differ in reduction of water content under wind treatment.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
reduction of water-contente0
Direction
No differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in the reduction of water-content were recognized between the sites of leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in ear water content between wind-treated and untreated plants were unclear.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
earse0
Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
water-contente0
Comparator
untreatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences of water-content between the ears of treated and untreated were not clear in the present experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem water-content reduction under wind was smallest.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
steme0
Treatment
winde0
Outcome
reduction of water-contente0
Direction
smalleste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of water-contents in each organ of rice plants treated by wind have been observed.In a leaf, the reduction of water-content was considerably large in the upper half part of leaf blade No differences in the reduction of water-content were recognized between the sites of leaves. The differences of water-content between the ears of treated and untreated were not clear in the present experiment.The reduction of water-content in the stem was smallest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A stem bearing a young head before heading had considerably large water-content reduction under wind.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
steme0
Treatment
winde0
Outcome
reduction of water-contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of water-contents in each organ of rice plants treated by wind have been observed.In a leaf, the reduction of water-content was considerably large in the upper half part of leaf blade No differences in the reduction of water-content were recognized between the sites of leaves. The differences of water-content between the ears of treated and untreated were not clear in the present experiment.The reduction of water-content in the stem was smallest, but when the stem have had a young head before heading it was considerably large.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stronger wind and longer exposure produced more marked reduction of water content.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativat0
Treatment
stronger wind and of longer duration of treatmente0
Outcome
reduction of water-conteante0
Direction
more remarkablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the condition of stronger wind and of longer duration of treatment, the reduction of water-conteant was more remarkable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑

wind · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.