Paper · 1954 · Australian Journal of Botany

The effect of wind sway on the form and development of Pinus radiata D. Don

MR Jacobs

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
207
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The average growth of four series of trees of Pinus radiata D. Don, which were prevented from swaying in the wind by the attachment of guy-wires, is compared with the average growth of similar series of free-swaying trees. Free-swaying trees grew more in diameter over the lower part of the trunk than stayed trees. After 10 yr the increased growth due to sway could be detected to a height on the trunk of between 25 and 30 ft. The effect of sway at a height of 4 f t was greater in a very heavily thinned test area than in a well-stocked test area. Sway caused increased diameter growth of roots near the trunk and increased eccentric trunk development along the line of the main winds. The height growth of the stayed trees was little different from that of the free-swaying trees, but height/diameter relationships were changed. After 2 yr trees that had been prevented from swaying were no longer stable in a normal environment. When the upper parts of stayed trees were allowed to sway the trees made good use of the factors of the locality for 8 yr. In a series where stayed trees were prevented from swaying throughout their length progressive suppression of diameter and volume increment was observed over 15 yr. Individual reaction to the stimulus of sway appeared to be one of the factors that contributed to the progressive assertion of dominance by certain trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Free swaying increased lower trunk diameter growth.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Treatment
Free-swayinge0
Outcome
diameter over the lower part of the trunke0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
stayed treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Free-swaying trees grew more in diameter over the lower part of the trunk than stayed trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sway related diameter growth reached 25 to 30 ft after 10 years.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Outcome
increased growth due to swaye0
Value
between 25 and 30 fte0
Qualifier
After 10 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 10 yr the increased growth due to sway could be detected to a height on the trunk of between 25 and 30 ft”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sway effects at 4 ft were greater in heavily thinned than well stocked areas.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Treatment
swaye0
Outcome
effect of swaye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
well-stocked test areae0
Setting
very heavily thinned test areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of sway at a height of 4 f t was greater in a very heavily thinned test area than in a well-stocked test area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sway increased root diameter growth near the trunk.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Treatment
Swaye0
Outcome
diameter growth of roots near the trunke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sway caused increased diameter growth of roots near the trunk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sway increased eccentric trunk development along prevailing winds.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Treatment
swayt1
Outcome
eccentric trunk developmente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
along the line of the main windse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased eccentric trunk development along the line of the main winds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑
t1

“wind sway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stayed and free swaying trees had little difference in height growth.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Treatment
stayed treese0
Outcome
height growthe0
Direction
little differente0
Comparator
free-swaying treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The height growth of the stayed trees was little different from that of the free-swaying trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Staying changed height to diameter relationships.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Treatment
stayed treest1
Outcome
height/diameter relationshipse0
Direction
changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“height/diameter relationships were changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑
t1

“stayed trees was little different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees prevented from swaying were unstable after two years.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Treatment
prevented from swayinge0
Outcome
no longer stablee0
Qualifier
After 2 yre0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 2 yr trees that had been prevented from swaying were no longer stable in a normal environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When upper parts could sway, stayed trees used locality factors well for eight years.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Outcome
made good use of the factors of the localitye0
Qualifier
for 8 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the upper parts of stayed trees were allowed to sway the trees made good use of the factors of the locality for 8 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full length restraint progressively suppressed diameter and volume increment over 15 years.

Taxon
Pinus radiata D. DonPinus radiatat0
Treatment
prevented from swaying throughout their lengthe0
Outcome
diameter and volume incremente0
Direction
suppressione0
Qualifier
over 15 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata · Taxondalvenjah on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stayed trees were prevented from swaying throughout their length progressive suppression of diameter and volume increment was observed over 15 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus radiata D. Don”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75 · show in text ↑