Paper · 2012 · Chinese Journal of Appplied Environmental Biology

Effects of Drought Stress and Rewatering on Physiological Characteristics of Pear Seedling

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to understand the physiological adaptation mechanism and recovery mechanism of plant to drought,the physiological characteristics,including photosynthetic parameters,leaf relative water content,leaf membrane permeability,SOD activity and proline content of pear seedling under drought stress and rewatering conditions were investigated with the varieties ‘Cuiguan’ and ‘Huangguan’ as materials.The results showed that: 1) In the process of drought stress,leaf net photosynthetic rate,stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of the two varieties were decreased.Intercellular CO2 concentration was initially reduced and then increased in ‘Cuiguan’ leaf,while it showed a consistent downward trend in ‘Huangguan’.The four parameters of ‘Huangguan’ were significantly higher than those of ‘Cuiguan’,and the photosynthetic parameters of both varieties were significantly recovered after rewatering,however they could not recover to the normal level.2) Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and increase of the membrane permeability and proline content.And the superoxide dismutase activity in the leaves of both varieties was initially increased and decreased afterwards.Although these parameters could more or less recover after rewatering,they could not reach the normal level.This study suggested that the drought stress tolerance of ‘Huangguan’ was better than that of ‘Cuiguan’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased leaf net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration in both varieties.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf net photosynthetic rate,stomatal conductance and transpiration ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the process of drought stress,leaf net photosynthetic rate,stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of the two varieties were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Cuiguan, leaf intercellular CO2 first decreased then increased during drought.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Material
‘Cuiguan’e0
Outcome
Intercellular CO2 concentratione0
Direction
initially reduced and then increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercellular CO2 concentration was initially reduced and then increased in ‘Cuiguan’ leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Huangguan, leaf intercellular CO2 declined consistently during drought.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Material
‘Huangguan’e0
Outcome
Intercellular CO2 concentratione1
Direction
consistent downward trende0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it showed a consistent downward trend in ‘Huangguan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intercellular CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The four photosynthetic parameters were significantly higher in Huangguan than Cuiguan.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Material
‘Huangguan’e0
Outcome
photosynthetic parameterse1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
‘Cuiguan’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The four parameters of ‘Huangguan’ were significantly higher than those of ‘Cuiguan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–807 · show in text ↑
e1

“the photosynthetic parameters of both varieties were significantly recovered after rewatering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After rewatering, photosynthetic parameters significantly recovered in both varieties but stayed below normal.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Treatment
rewateringe0
Outcome
photosynthetic parameterse0
Direction
recoverede0
Qualifier
could not recover to the normal levele0
Comparator
normal levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic parameters of both varieties were significantly recovered after rewatering,however they could not recover to the normal level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought caused a decrease in relative water content.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and increase of the membrane permeability and proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought caused a increase in membrane permeability.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and increase of the membrane permeability and proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought caused a increase in proline content.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and increase of the membrane permeability and proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf superoxide dismutase activity first increased and then decreased in both varieties.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Gene
superoxide dismutasee0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase activitye0
Direction
initially increased and decreased afterwardse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the superoxide dismutase activity in the leaves of both varieties was initially increased and decreased afterwards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water content, membrane permeability, proline and SOD activity partly recovered after rewatering without reaching normal levels.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Treatment
rewateringe0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
recovere0
Qualifier
could not reach the normal levele0
Comparator
normal levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although these parameters could more or less recover after rewatering,they could not reach the normal level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1322 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative water content and increase of the membrane permeability and proline content.And the superoxide dismutase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Huangguan was judged more drought tolerant than Cuiguan.

Taxon
Pear SeedlingPyrus communist0
Material
‘Huangguan’e0
Outcome
drought stress tolerancee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
‘Cuiguan’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress tolerance of ‘Huangguan’ was better than that of ‘Cuiguan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.