Paper · 1988 · Japanese Journal of Crop Science

Genetical variability of excised-leaf water retention capability in wheat.

Gnanasiri S. PREMACHANDRA; Tohru SHIMADA

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Excised-leaf water retention capability of spring wheat and winter wheat were tested. Cultivar differences were well differentiated when the decrease in leaf water content % was between 11 and 30. An increase in excised-leaf water retention capability and a decrease in leaf water content were seen during winter compared to summer. Drought hardened plants showed higher water retention capability. Excised-leaf water retention capability of the progenies from three crosses of winter wheat were evaluated. Frequency distribution patterns of the progenies showed the characteristic pattern of quantitative inheritance. Excised-leaf water retention capability of wheat seems to be a quantitative character governed by polygene action.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar differences in wheat water retention were differentiated when leaf water content decreased by 11 to 30 percent.

Material
Cultivare0
Outcome
Cultivar differencese0
Qualifier
between 11 and 30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar differences were well differentiated when the decrease in leaf water content % was between 11 and 30.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–196 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat excised-leaf water retention capability increased in winter relative to summer.

Outcome
excised-leaf water retention capabilitye0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
summere0
Setting
wintere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in excised-leaf water retention capability and a decrease in leaf water content were seen during winter compared to summer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat leaf water content decreased in winter relative to summer.

Outcome
leaf water contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
summere0
Setting
wintere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in excised-leaf water retention capability and a decrease in leaf water content were seen during winter compared to summer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-hardened wheat had higher water retention capability.

Treatment
Drought hardenede0
Outcome
water retention capabilitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought hardened plants showed higher water retention capability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat progeny water retention distributions showed quantitative inheritance.

Material
progenies from three crosses of winter wheate1
Outcome
characteristic pattern of quantitative inheritancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Frequency distribution patterns of the progenies showed the characteristic pattern of quantitative inheritance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–618 · show in text ↑
e1

“progenies from three crosses of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat excised-leaf water retention appears to be a quantitative character governed by multiple genes.

Outcome
Excised-leaf water retention capabilitye0
Qualifier
polygene actione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Excised-leaf water retention capability of wheat seems to be a quantitative character governed by polygene action.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–733 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.