Paper · 2014 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Herbaspirillum seropedicae inoculation and nitrogen fertilization on nitrogen use efficiency of different corn genotypes

Reis Martins Marcio; Carlos Tadeu Vitorino Antonio; Sacramento Urquiaga Segundo

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The biological N fixation provided by diazotrophic bacteria may be an alternative for corn production in more sustainable or low-input agricultural systems. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the interactive effect of seed inoculation with Herbaspirillum seropedicae and nitrogen fertilization on the nitrogen use efficiency of different corn genotypes, through the technique of isotopic dilution of 15N. The experiment was carried out under controlled conditions in a greenhouse using a completely randomized design in a 3 × 2 × 2 factorial scheme with three corn hybrids: Maximus, P3646H and BRS3035, using inoculated and non-inoculated plants with two nitrogen doses (0.0 and 80 kg ha-1) and four replicates. At 35 days after emergence plants were collected, divided into root and shoots and analyzed with regard to root and shoot dry matter production, accumulated N in plant, N percentage and content coming from the fertilizer and use efficiency of N applied as a fertilizer. Results showed that there is a difference between corn genotypes concerning shoot dry matter production and percentage of N shoot coming from the fertilizer. Shoot dry matter production is influenced by H. seropedicae inoculation. This inoculation coupled with nitrogen fertilization promotes shoot N increments of about 32 and 62% for the hybrids P3646H and BRS3035, respectively. These hybrids showed increases of 34.3 and 64.4%, respectively, in N use efficiency when inoculated with H. seropedicae without the addition of N, what allows inferring that the BNF behaves as an important source of N to the system. Key words: Zea mays L., diazotrophic bacteria, 15N, nitrogen fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn genotypes differed in shoot dry matter production and fertilizer-derived shoot nitrogen.

Material
corn genotypese0
Outcome
shoot dry matter production and percentage of N shoot coming from the fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“difference between corn genotypes concerning shoot dry matter production and percentage of N shoot coming from the fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation influenced corn shoot dry matter production.

Treatment
H. seropedicae inoculatione0
Interactor
H. seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee0symbiont
Outcome
Shoot dry matter productione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry matter production is influenced by H. seropedicae inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“three corn hybrids: Maximus, P3646H and BRS3035”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation plus nitrogen fertilizer increased shoot nitrogen in P3646H by about 32%.

Material
P3646He0
Treatment
inoculation coupled with nitrogen fertilizatione0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee2symbiont
Outcome
shoot Ne0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
32e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This inoculation coupled with nitrogen fertilization promotes shoot N increments of about 32 and 62% for the hybrids P3646H and BRS3035, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1368 · show in text ↑
e1

“three corn hybrids: Maximus, P3646H and BRS3035”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–606 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed inoculation with Herbaspirillum seropedicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation plus nitrogen fertilizer increased shoot nitrogen in BRS3035 by about 62%.

Material
BRS3035e0
Treatment
inoculation coupled with nitrogen fertilizatione0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee2symbiont
Outcome
shoot Ne0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This inoculation coupled with nitrogen fertilization promotes shoot N increments of about 32 and 62% for the hybrids P3646H and BRS3035, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1368 · show in text ↑
e1

“three corn hybrids: Maximus, P3646H and BRS3035”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–606 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed inoculation with Herbaspirillum seropedicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without added nitrogen, inoculation increased nitrogen use efficiency in P3646H by 34.3%.

Material
P3646He1
Treatment
inoculated with H. seropedicae without the addition of Ne0
Interactor
H. seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee0symbiont
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasese0
Value
34.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These hybrids showed increases of 34.3 and 64.4%, respectively, in N use efficiency when inoculated with H. seropedicae without the addition of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1514 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrids P3646H and BRS3035”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1353 · show in text ↑
e2

“three corn hybrids: Maximus, P3646H and BRS3035”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without added nitrogen, inoculation increased nitrogen use efficiency in BRS3035 by 64.4%.

Material
BRS3035e1
Treatment
inoculated with H. seropedicae without the addition of Ne0
Interactor
H. seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee0symbiont
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasese0
Value
64.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These hybrids showed increases of 34.3 and 64.4%, respectively, in N use efficiency when inoculated with H. seropedicae without the addition of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1514 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrids P3646H and BRS3035”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1353 · show in text ↑
e2

“three corn hybrids: Maximus, P3646H and BRS3035”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–606 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Herbaspirillum seropedicae · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Herbaspirillum seropedicae · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.