Paper · 1994 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Photosynthesis of Ungrafted and Grafted Grapevines: Effects of Rootstock Genotype and Plant Age

H. Düring

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
71
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Measurements of the daily maximum rate of photosynthesis (Amax) of leaves of ungrafted and grafted field-grown grapevine varieties indicated higher rates in vines grafted to the rootstock Kober 5BB. While higher rates of Amax in grafted Orion and Gf.Ga-54-14 vines were linked to both higher values of the carboxylation efficiency and of stomatal conductance in Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42 vines, it was associated with increases of the carboxylation efficiency but not with stomatal conductance. This led to distinctly higher values of the water use efficiency of grafted Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42 vines. Similar results were obtained using four-year-old potted vines; Riesling grafted to Kober 5BB had significantly higher rates of photosynthesis but similar rates of stomatal conductance compared to ungrafted Riesling or Riesling grafted to Riesling. Within the first four years the rate of photosynthesis of leaves of ungrafted and grafted Riesling vines increased more than twofold. It is suggested that grafting vines to appropriate rootstock varieties which favor the increase of the carboxylation efficiency of scion leaves may help to improve drought resistance by raising the water use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vines grafted to rootstock Kober 5BB had higher daily maximum photosynthesis rates (Amax) in leaves than ungrafted field-grown grapevines.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
grafted to the rootstock Kober 5BBe1
Outcome
daily maximum rate of photosynthesis (Amax) of leavese1
Direction
higher ratese1
Comparator
ungraftede1
Setting
field-growne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Measurements of the daily maximum rate of photosynthesis (Amax) of leaves of ungrafted and grafted field-grown grapevine varieties indicated higher rates in vines grafted to the rootstock Kober 5BB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–197 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher Amax in grafted Orion and Gf.Ga-54-14 vines was linked to higher carboxylation efficiency and stomatal conductance.

Taxon
vinese1
Material
Orion and Gf.Ga-54-14e1
Outcome
carboxylation efficiency and of stomatal conductancee1
Direction
higher valuese1

Verbatim

e1

“While higher rates of Amax in grafted Orion and Gf.Ga-54-14 vines were linked to both higher values of the carboxylation efficiency and of stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–358 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher Amax in Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42 vines was associated with increased carboxylation efficiency.

Taxon
vinese1
Material
Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42e1
Outcome
carboxylation efficiencye1
Direction
increasese1

Verbatim

e1

“Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42 vines, it was associated with increases of the carboxylation efficiency but not with stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–492 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher Amax in Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42 vines was not associated with a change in stomatal conductance.

Taxon
vinese1
Material
Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42e1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Verbatim

e1

“Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42 vines, it was associated with increases of the carboxylation efficiency but not with stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted Riesling (Kober 5BB) vines had significantly higher photosynthesis rates than ungrafted Riesling or Riesling grafted to Riesling in potted vines.

Taxon
vinese2
Material
Rieslinge1
Treatment
grafted to Kober 5BBe1
Outcome
rates of photosynthesise1
Direction
higher ratese1
Comparator
ungrafted Riesling or Riesling grafted to Rieslinge1
Setting
four-year-old potted vinese2

Verbatim

e1

“Riesling grafted to Kober 5BB had significantly higher rates of photosynthesis but similar rates of stomatal conductance compared to ungrafted Riesling or Riesling grafted to Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–849 · show in text ↑
e2

“Similar results were obtained using four-year-old potted vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted Riesling (Kober 5BB) vines had similar stomatal conductance to ungrafted Riesling or Riesling grafted to Riesling in potted vines.

Taxon
vinese2
Treatment
grafted to Kober 5BBe1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee1
Direction
similar ratese1
Comparator
ungrafted Riesling or Riesling grafted to Rieslinge1
Setting
four-year-old potted vinese2

Verbatim

e1

“Riesling grafted to Kober 5BB had significantly higher rates of photosynthesis but similar rates of stomatal conductance compared to ungrafted Riesling or Riesling grafted to Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–849 · show in text ↑
e2

“Similar results were obtained using four-year-old potted vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–664 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis rate of leaves of ungrafted and grafted Riesling vines increased more than twofold within the first four years.

Taxon
vinese1
Material
Rieslinge1
Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
rate of photosynthesise1
Direction
increasede1
Value
more than twofolde1
Qualifier
Within the first four yearse1

Verbatim

e1

“Within the first four years the rate of photosynthesis of leaves of ungrafted and grafted Riesling vines increased more than twofold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–983 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting raised water use efficiency in Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42 vines.

Taxon
vinese1
Material
Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42e1
Outcome
water use efficiencye1
Direction
higher valuese1

Verbatim

e1

“This led to distinctly higher values of the water use efficiency of grafted Riesling and Gf.Ga-47-42 vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–600 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting vines to rootstocks that favor carboxylation efficiency may help improve drought resistance.

Taxon
vinese1
Outcome
drought resistancee1
Qualifier
by raising the water use efficiencye1

Verbatim

e1

“It is suggested that grafting vines to appropriate rootstock varieties which favor the increase of the carboxylation efficiency of scion leaves may help to improve drought resistance by raising the water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1203 · show in text ↑

grafting · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.