Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Fruit Science

Bioaccumulation, Ionome and Physiological Responses to Copper Toxicity of Iranian Grapevine Rootstocks Grafted with ‘Asgari’ Seedless Grape

Siamak Shirani Bidabadi; Paolo Sabbatini

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Use of proper rootstocks has the potential to improve copper (Cu) tolerance of grape. To evaluate the rootstock ability to reduce Cu transfer in the aerial portion of a grapevine, a glasshouse experiment was conducted to determine the physiological impact of Cu soil application in ‘Asgari’ seedless grape, either non-grafted or grafted onto different rootstocks. Vines were supplied with a nutrient solution at four levels of CuSO4 concentrations (0, 10, 25 and 50 µM). Cu toxicity symptoms in leaves and reduced plant growth rate were evident in the non-grafted ‘Asgari’ and less pronounced in grapevines grafted onto ‘Shahani’ rootstock. Moreover, ‘Asgari’ grafted onto ‘Shahani’ rootstock had lower rate of Cu accumulation in the leaves when compared to the roots than those of non-grafted and ‘Asgari’ with ‘Keshmeshi’ rootstock. Although significant reduction of P in non-grafted ‘Asgari’ leaf tissue was found under Cu toxicity, ‘Shahani’ rootstock reported the highest amount of P (5.94 mg g−1) in the leaves of ‘Asgari’ scion. However, significant fluctuations in terms of Ca and Fe were reported in leaves of both grafted and non-grafted ‘Asgari’. When exposed to Cu toxicity, ‘Shahani’ rootstock induced significant increase in chlorophyll content, Fv/Fm ratio and a noticeable reduction in electrolyte leakage, H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) compared to those having ‘Keshmeshi’ rootstock and non-grafted ‘Asgari’. ‘Shahani’ rootstock improved ‘Asgari’ performance under Cu toxicity by slowly reducing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, preventing Cu accumulation in the aerial parts and maintaining a balanced scion nutritional status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper toxicity symptoms and reduced growth were less pronounced with Shahani rootstock than in non-grafted Asgari.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
‘Asgari’e0
Treatment
‘Shahani’ rootstocke0
Outcome
Cu toxicity symptoms in leavese0
Direction
less pronouncede0
Comparator
non-grafted ‘Asgari’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu toxicity symptoms in leaves and reduced plant growth rate were evident in the non-grafted ‘Asgari’ and less pronounced in grapevines grafted onto ‘Shahani’ rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shahani grafting reduced leaf copper accumulation relative to roots compared with non-grafted and Keshmeshi vines.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Material
‘Asgari’e0
Treatment
‘Shahani’ rootstocke0
Outcome
Cu accumulation in the leavese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
non-grafted and ‘Asgari’ with ‘Keshmeshi’ rootstocke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Asgari’ grafted onto ‘Shahani’ rootstock had lower rate of Cu accumulation in the leaves when compared to the roots than those of non-grafted and ‘Asgari’ with ‘Keshmeshi’ rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper toxicity significantly reduced phosphorus in non-grafted Asgari leaves.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Material
‘Asgari’e0
Treatment
Cu toxicitye0
Outcome
P in non-grafted ‘Asgari’ leaf tissuee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant reduction of P in non-grafted ‘Asgari’ leaf tissue was found under Cu toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shahani rootstock had the highest phosphorus amount in Asgari scion leaves, 5.94 mg g−1.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Material
‘Shahani’e0
Outcome
amount of Pe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.94 mg g−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Shahani’ rootstock reported the highest amount of P (5.94 mg g−1) in the leaves of ‘Asgari’ scion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf calcium and iron fluctuated significantly in grafted and non-grafted Asgari.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Material
‘Asgari’e0
Outcome
Ca and Fee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant fluctuations in terms of Ca and Fe were reported in leaves of both grafted and non-grafted ‘Asgari’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under copper toxicity, Shahani rootstock increased chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm ratio relative to Keshmeshi and non-grafted Asgari.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
‘Shahani’ rootstocke0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, Fv/Fm ratioe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
‘Keshmeshi’ rootstock and non-grafted ‘Asgari’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Shahani’ rootstock induced significant increase in chlorophyll content, Fv/Fm ratio and a noticeable reduction in electrolyte leakage, H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) compared to those having ‘Keshmeshi’ rootstock and non-grafted ‘Asgari’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under copper toxicity, Shahani rootstock reduced electrolyte leakage, H2O2 and MDA relative to Keshmeshi and non-grafted Asgari.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
‘Shahani’ rootstocke0
Outcome
electrolyte leakage, H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
‘Keshmeshi’ rootstock and non-grafted ‘Asgari’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Shahani’ rootstock induced significant increase in chlorophyll content, Fv/Fm ratio and a noticeable reduction in electrolyte leakage, H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) compared to those having ‘Keshmeshi’ rootstock and non-grafted ‘Asgari’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–91 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shahani rootstock improved Asgari performance under copper toxicity while reducing antioxidant enzyme activity and copper accumulation and maintaining nutrition.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
‘Shahani’ rootstocke0
Outcome
‘Asgari’ performancee0
Qualifier
slowly reducing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, preventing Cu accumulation in the aerial parts and maintaining a balanced scion nutritional statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Shahani’ rootstock improved ‘Asgari’ performance under Cu toxicity by slowly reducing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, preventing Cu accumulation in the aerial parts and maintaining a balanced scion nutritional status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–91 · show in text ↑

grafting · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

grafting · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

grafting · physiology: oxidative · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.