Paper · 1986 · Annals of Botany

The Anatomical Relationship Between Cambial Regeneration and Root Initiation in Wounded Winter Cuttings of the Apple Rootstock M.26

K. A. D. MACKENZIE; B. H. HOWARD; R. S. HARRISON-MURRAY

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Root primordia differentiate remote from the existing vascular tissue of split- or incision- wounded winter cuttings. This is preceded by heavy callusing of the wounds and basal cut surface. Most of the callus is cortical in origin but callus is also formed as a result of damage to the cambium. In the incision treatment a new cambium differentiates within the cambial callus from the undamaged cambium on either side so as to form an outward-pointing salient enclosing randomly orientated xylem. Two such salients are formed in the split base treatment since each resultant half behaves like a separate cutting. The salients are subdivided horizontally into finger-like projections due to the disposition of the rays at the edges of the wound. Once a root primordium forms, differentiation of procambium-like tissue between it and one or more projections proceeds rapidly, followed by outgrowth of the root. Roots emerge from the basal callus and in vertical files from the wound callus. The split base treatment increases 16-fold the number of rooted cuttings over controls, while incision wounds increase rooting four-fold; this is associated with the fact that more rhizogenic (salient-forming) sites are formed by splitting the base. The physical and anatomical factors involved in cambial regeneration are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root primordia differentiated away from existing vascular tissue in wounded cuttings.

Material
M.26t0
Organ / stage
winter cuttingse0
Outcome
Root primordia differentiate remote from the existing vascular tissuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root primordia differentiate remote from the existing vascular tissue of split- or incision- wounded winter cuttings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy wound and basal callusing preceded root primordium differentiation.

Outcome
heavy callusing of the wounds and basal cut surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This is preceded by heavy callusing of the wounds and basal cut surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–190 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root primordia differentiate remote from the existing vascular tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most callus arose from the cortex, with additional callus from cambium damage.

Outcome
callus is cortical in origin but callus is also formed as a result of damage to the cambiume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the callus is cortical in origin but callus is also formed as a result of damage to the cambium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incision produced a new cambium enclosing randomly oriented xylem.

Treatment
incision treatmente0
Outcome
a new cambium differentiates within the cambial calluse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the incision treatment a new cambium differentiates within the cambial callus from the undamaged cambium on either side so as to form an outward-pointing salient enclosing randomly orientated xylem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting the base produced two cambial salients.

Treatment
split base treatmente0
Outcome
salients are formede0
Value
Twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two such salients are formed in the split base treatment since each resultant half behaves like a separate cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cambial salients were subdivided into finger-like projections by wound-edge rays.

Outcome
salients are subdivided horizontally into finger-like projectionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The salients are subdivided horizontally into finger-like projections due to the disposition of the rays at the edges of the wound.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Procambium-like tissue differentiated between root primordia and projections before root outgrowth.

Outcome
differentiation of procambium-like tissue between it and one or more projections proceeds rapidlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Once a root primordium forms, differentiation of procambium-like tissue between it and one or more projections proceeds rapidly, followed by outgrowth of the root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots emerged from basal callus and vertical files in wound callus.

Outcome
Roots emerge from the basal callus and in vertical files from the wound calluse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Roots emerge from the basal callus and in vertical files from the wound callus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split-base treatment increased rooted cutting number 16-fold over controls.

Treatment
split base treatmente0
Outcome
number of rooted cuttingse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
16-folde0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The split base treatment increases 16-fold the number of rooted cuttings over controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incision wounds increased rooting four-fold.

Treatment
incision woundse0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
increasee0
Value
four-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incision wounds increase rooting four-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors associated the greater rooting after splitting with more rhizogenic sites.

Treatment
splitting the basee0
Outcome
more rhizogenic (salient-forming) sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this is associated with the fact that more rhizogenic (salient-forming) sites are formed by splitting the base.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Rootstock M.26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 · show in text ↑

mechanical · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.