Paper · 2010 · Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America

Effect of chicken manure on yield, quality and HCN concentration of two forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench) cultivars.

Awad Abusuwar; H. A. El-Zilal

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted for two successive years (2000-2001) in the Demonstration Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum in Shambat to investigate the response of two forage sorghum cultivars to different rates of chicken manure in two different seasons (summer and winter). The treatments consisted of four chicken manure levels (0, 2.5, 5.5 and 7.0 tons/ ha.), two cultivars of forage sorghum (Abu Sabein and Pioneer) and two sowing dates (winter and summer). Treatments were arranged in a split-split plot design with four replications. The parameters measured included fresh and dry matter yields and proximate analysis to determine the nutritive value and the HCN concentration of the forage. Results showed that chicken manure rates had a significant effect on yield and nutritive value of the forage produced during both seasons throughout the experimental period. The maximum forage fresh yield of 33.21 tons/ha was recorded for the highest rate of chicken manure applied (7.5 tons/ha) compared to 17.71 tons/ha for the control during the first year. On the other hand maximum dry forage yield of 16 tons/ha was recorded for the same treatment compared to 11.42 tons/ha for the control during the same period. In both years no significant effects of cultivars on forage yield, except for dry matter production in the second year. Summer sowing significantly outyieded winter sowing throughout the experimental period. Chicken manure application significantly improved forage quality in terms of crude protein and crude fiber, with highest protein and lowest fiber recorded for the highest dose of chicken manure applied compared to the control. Summer planting resulted in a significantly higher P and Ca compared to winter planting. Pioneer significantly exceeded Abu Sabein in Mg content through out the experimental period. Prussic acid contents were significantly increased by chicken manure treatment. Abu Sabein (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) had greater contents of prussic acid than Pioneer cultivar and all prussic acid content of Pioneer cultivar did not reach the toxic level (>204 ppm) during the two seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure rates significantly affected forage yield and nutritive value in both seasons.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
chicken manure ratese0
Outcome
yield and nutritive valuee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“chicken manure rates had a significant effect on yield and nutritive value of the forage produced during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest manure rate gave a maximum fresh forage yield of 33.21 tons/ha versus 17.71 tons/ha for the control in the first year.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
highest rate of chicken manure applied (7.5 tons/ha)e0
Outcome
forage fresh yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
33.21 tons/hae0
Qualifier
17.71 tons/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum forage fresh yield of 33.21 tons/ha was recorded for the highest rate of chicken manure applied (7.5 tons/ha) compared to 17.71 tons/ha for the control during the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest manure rate gave a maximum dry forage yield of 16 tons/ha versus 11.42 tons/ha for the control.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Outcome
dry forage yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
16 tons/hae0
Qualifier
11.42 tons/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum dry forage yield of 16 tons/ha was recorded for the same treatment compared to 11.42 tons/ha for the control during the same period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1240 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars generally did not differ significantly in forage yield except second-year dry matter production.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
forage yielde0
Qualifier
except for dry matter production in the second yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both years no significant effects of cultivars on forage yield, except for dry matter production in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer sowing outyielded winter sowing significantly.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
Summer sowinge0
Outcome
outyiedede0
Direction
outyiedede0
Comparator
winter sowinge0

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Summer sowing significantly outyieded winter sowing throughout the experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure improved crude protein content, highest at the highest dose.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
highest dose of chicken manure appliede0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chicken manure application significantly improved forage quality in terms of crude protein and crude fiber, with highest protein and lowest fiber recorded for the highest dose of chicken manure applied compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure lowered crude fiber, lowest at the highest dose.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
highest dose of chicken manure appliede0
Outcome
fibere0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chicken manure application significantly improved forage quality in terms of crude protein and crude fiber, with highest protein and lowest fiber recorded for the highest dose of chicken manure applied compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer planting yielded higher P and Ca than winter planting.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
Summer plantinge0
Outcome
P and Cae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
winter plantinge0

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Summer planting resulted in a significantly higher P and Ca compared to winter planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1764 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pioneer exceeded Abu Sabein in Mg content.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Material
Pioneere0
Outcome
Mg contente0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
Abu Sabeine0

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pioneer significantly exceeded Abu Sabein in Mg content through out the experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure increased prussic acid content.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
chicken manure treatmente0
Outcome
Prussic acid contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Prussic acid contents were significantly increased by chicken manure treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1937 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abu Sabein had more prussic acid than Pioneer.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchSorghum bicolore0
Material
Abu Sabeine0
Outcome
contents of prussic acide0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Pioneer cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Abu Sabein (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) had greater contents of prussic acid than Pioneer cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1939–2038 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pioneer prussic acid remained below the toxic threshold in both seasons.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Material
Pioneer cultivare0
Outcome
prussic acid contente0
Direction
did not reache0
Value
>204 ppme0

Verbatim

t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“all prussic acid content of Pioneer cultivar did not reach the toxic level (>204 ppm) during the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2043–2151 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

22 papers: 15 positive, 7 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

53 papers: 47 positive, 6 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.